View: https://old.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1rrppdo/from_an_intersectional_feminist_perspective_how/
Feminists see nothing wrong with this, obviously. All ethnic feminists want is unlimited access to whitu cocku.
JFL From an intersectional feminist perspective, how should we understand backlash toward women of color who exclusively date white men?
View: https://old.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1rrppdo/from_an_intersectional_feminist_perspective_how/
Feminists see nothing wrong with this, obviously. All ethnic feminists want is unlimited access to whitu cocku.
The entire thread is just holes arguing over whether the question is worthy of an answer, as if their effort of responsive text needs to be for the correct narrative of helping a curious student.
I don’t blame them.
lies white men dating minorities have more backlash. as an indian man if i say i wont date indian foids i will get more backlash than these foids of color
People who waste their entire lives obsessing over racism somehow think overwhelmingly preferring one race of men in dating isn't racist and will resort to the most absurd mental gymnastics, post hoc rationalizations, and desperate futile pathetic forms of damage control to defend and justify their behavior. More proof all females are pathologically inept retards with no self awareness that are too braindead to recognize their own blind spots and biases.
Last edited:
Those women are racist towards men of their own race.
Women are the biggest racists.
Women are the biggest racists.
Another symptom of our rotten feminist society.
I really hate woke speak. They over explicate everything because half of them are so retarded that they can’t understand a concept unless it’s spelled out a million times for the lowest common denominator. Then they try to off set this by using overly long words like heuristics and intersectional that no normal person uses in the real world. And then they all immediately get offended because somebody didn’t explicitly state that they disagree with some outrage they’re discussing (descriptivist conversations are impossible with woke people because they automatically assume that if you don’t repeatedly condem something then you agree with it) and the conversation derails into trannies with autism insulting eachother.
Stupid foids actually think their opinion matters, JFL.
True.
Agreed completely.
I hate people who complicate a topic to sound smarter, I almost had a stroke reading the post.
Even the title can be improved.
Original version:
"From an intersectional feminist perspective, how should we understand backlash toward women of color who exclusively date white men?"
My version:
"How do you interpret the backlash for non-white woman, exclusively dating white man?"
Last edited:
We could make it even more woke Reddit.
From the heuristics of an intersectional feminist perspective, how should we understand the cultural reaction formation schemas directed at cis het Women of Color who exclusively date white men? I don’t condone dating only white men and I don’t condone internalized racism and white supremacy. I have anxiety, autism, adhd, chlamydia and syphallis. My pronouns are they/them. I’m a biracial autistic lesbian feminist non binary undocumented Muslim.
Damn good one, I like how you farmed all the sympathy points
"Former rape victim, with cptsd. Disabled by choice."
I’ll have you know I’m the most complex case my doctor has ever seen.
Actually they don’t say that anymore.
“The most complex case I’ve ever seen” was mostly back in pre-2013 when Asperger’s was a stand alone diagnosis and you couldn’t have Asperger’s and adhd or Asperger’s and ocd or Asperger’s and schizophrenia or Asperger’s and anxiety. So you had only Asperger’s. But then the Aspie with another diagnosis that wasn’t allowed to be made was presenting with traits that sdidnt fit Asperger’s. So the therapist was like “this is my most complex case”. But what they were actually seeing was INTERSECTING (oh no woke speak) conditions in a time when intersecting conditions couldn’t be diagnosed.
Joke or not I ain't reading all that bull bull.
"You can be blind and deaf at the same time!? What a revelation" ~ The psycholgist.
Give it a go and see how much your brain fries at the end.
A lot of the “most complex Asperger I’ve ever seen” were probably AuDHD or AuCD that couldn’t be comorbid so the diagnosis was Asperger’s but the underlying traits of the other disorder made it weird.
Some scandi psychiatrist did a study into Asperger criminals including mass shooters back years ago and concluded almost all of them had ADHD but because it was pre-2013 they were only allowed Asperger’s diagnoses which created the autistic mass shooter stereotype.
In reality most mass shooters and other autistic criminals are AuDHD.
Exactly, there ISNT enough discussion about how foids (especially asian ones) fetishize white cocku.
They agree, it's TRUE, it's FACT. But they STILL Downvote, why?
Because admitting that truth 'derails the conversation' or because it is 'misogynistic'...
It's always 'b..bu..but you're making it out about men again and that's sexist/misogynistic etc.'
EVEN IF men fetishize the race of foids MORE than foids fetishize whites. It's still misogynistic in these retard's eyes because they view EVERYTHING in the lens of how it affects women. and it's obsessive, annoying and why I will NEVER EVER EVER take feminists serious.
There's no such thing as feminist literature, or feminist research, it's all propaganda designed to give more power to women and reduce power of men.
You're absolutely correct.View attachment 1691947
Exactly, there ISNT enough discussion about how foids (especially asian ones) fetishize white cocku.
They agree, it's TRUE, it's FACT. But they STILL Downvote, why?
Because admitting that truth 'derails the conversation' or because it is 'misogynistic'...
It's always 'b..bu..but you're making it out about men again and that's sexist/misogynistic etc.'
EVEN IF men fetishize the race of foids MORE than foids fetishize whites. It's still misogynistic in these retard's eyes because they view EVERYTHING in the lens of how it affects women. and it's obsessive, annoying and why I will NEVER EVER EVER take feminists serious.
There's no such thing as feminist literature, or feminist research, it's all propaganda designed to give more power to women and reduce power of men.
All femininst literature is propaganda, due to the fact there isn't a discussion of differing opinion.
This also matches with the fact that woman tend to have much higher in-group bias compared to men.
Interesting read. Thanks for the knowledge brother
Erm, Deathnics are actually more sexists than white males - ethnic cope
copeSimilar threads
- LTNcel
- The Lounge
UnwantedVirgin
Users who are viewing this thread
