Normies defending eugenics, as per usual. I’ll humor them, however.
The issue, (from a purely eugenics perspective, as they say) is that foids not only disproportionately select for physical superiority, but also select heavily on appearance. A 5’9 man with an incredible face will pass down his genes, but a 5’9 man with the exact same body, but a terrible (aesthetically) face will not.
Neither of these men are more fit in a purely eugenicist perspective.
Foids of course, do not
actually account for “muh personality” in sexual selection, and so 80 IQ degenerate, violent, murderer niggers like Meeks pass on their genes.
Foids do tend to select taller and broader men, and so, from a eugenics perspective, yes, this would be a benefit, as they are selecting stronger and bigger men to breed. However, as I states earlier, the major issue here is that foids also weigh facial aesthetics very heavily, while entirely discounting other important aspects such as IQ and ability to contribute to society. Like I said earlier, the only truely eugenic trait that Jeremy Meeks has is his height (6’1) each and every other trait of his is either irrelevant to building a functional society, (having a 9/10 face) or actively harmful (being a violent, 80 IQ, murderer nigger).
(Tl;dr)
And so, foids DO practice eugenics, as all animals do, however, their brand of eugenics is not focused on
survivability, but rather
pure aesthetics. Essentially, the men that foids are breeding are best compared to pugs or teacup chihuahuas. Both breeds were bred for aesthetic traits that were deemed desirable by humans, but in doing so, the actual health and viability of the breeds were neglected in the breeding process, and so pugs and other such breeds often suffer from major health issues.
This is all disregarding the fact that dysgenic foids remain active as incel factories, and so nothing that I just wrote actually matters in reality, as sub5 foids will continue to breed with 6-8/10 men and pump out more sub5 men.
