Their understanding of evolutionary biology and sexual selection is extremely simplistic. They clearly have no understanding of dynamics like Fisherian runaway, Koinophilia, Zahavi's handicap principle, and the Sexy Sons hypothesis. If they did, they would understand that sexual selection is quite multifaceted.
Women like honest signals of good health, but not all of these traits are necessarily beneficial to our species. Because of the handicap principle and Fisherian runaway, many of the traits that women select for are quite burdensome. Just look at peacocks and the extinct Irish elk.
Hatred and bigotry is fine on Reddit so long as you direct it towards the correct targets (lonely men).
It's just as bizarre as their idea that Medieval monks were all ugly and autistic men. Many medieval monks actually came from wealthy and socially connected backgrounds.
The monastic orders of the Middle Ages developed from the desire to live a spiritual life without the distractions of the world. Men and women who took religious vows were seeking a purity of experience...
www.worldhistory.org
In feudal systems, money and social prestige had even more buying power when it came to relationships. Most of these men could have married if they wanted to. Instead they chose an austere and celibate life because it had many perks back then. Monasteries provided men with spiritual purpose, social respect, and access to education.
