Serious Free sex session funded by the government to end inceldom

[MaxZM98]

I beleve that once a male turns 20, the government should pay for a free sex session with an attractive female escort every year. This service is to be given to single men only.
To ensure the man is single, they must fill out a form verifying this, and this form is accessable to the public, so if a man who is already in a relationship tries to use this service, their girlfriend can find out by contacting the government to see if their boyfriend filled the form out as 'single.' Therefore the girlfriend will know if her bf has cheated on her.

I believe this service will save money for the government in the long run, as there will be no more incels, and thus less depressed people seeking therapy. In the UK, this is funded by the NHS, which means tax payer's money will be saved. It also means there will be less rape, which means less money spent by the criminal justice system.

Overall, I think this is a great idea as it will make society happier overall, and even though the government has to spend money on escorts, it will save money in the long run due to the benefits it provides.

 

[Not_Important]

I also demand a MINIMUM of $2000 in neetbux a month to finance our LDAR lifestyle and prevent us from going ER

 

[hänonlutka]

Well still same old escortcel discussion. Many of us aren't that interested in the sex. Many of us just want love and affection by a femoid. An escort can't give u that. She could try to fake it but you will always know its fake at the end.

 

[Gokugetem]

Free? You sound like a roastie squealing about free pads and birth control pills.

I don't think denying incels the opportunity to pay for sex is right, but like every other need, you should have to earn money and pay for it yourself.

 

[thePhantom]

Everyone signing the form will be harassed by feminists. But a pretty good idea if you make it more anonymous. Though a first step would be to decriminalize it. If you already live in a country where it's decriminalized, you should be able to afford seeing an escort a few times a year anyway.

 

[Not_Important]

Free? You sound like a roastie squealing about free pads and birth control pills.

I don't think denying incels the opportunity to pay for sex is right, but like every other need, you should have to earn money and pay for it yourself.

The wagecuck cries out in pain as he strikes you

 

[Anonymous MG]

Still can't compare to government assigned gfs tbh, there's already a shit ton of escortcels here. It's not like we can't afford it, unless NEETmaxx.

 

[MaxZM98]

Still can't compare to government assigned gfs tbh, there's already a shit ton of escortcels here. It's not like we can't afford it, unless NEETmaxx.

paying for escorts can be dangerous, and the women are usually ugly with a fake picture shown online. if it was funded by the government, the process of seeing an escort would be much better in these regards.

 

[Gremlincel]

Having sex once a year would be entirely meaningless to me, I would be in just as bad a state as I am now.

 

[MaxZM98]

Free? You sound like a roastie squealing about free pads and birth control pills.

I don't think denying incels the opportunity to pay for sex is right, but like every other need, you should have to earn money and pay for it yourself.

read my response to anonymous MG

Having sex once a year would be entirely meaningless to me, I would be in just as bad a state as I am now.

much better than having 0 sex

 

[Anonymous MG]

paying for escorts can be dangerous, and the women are usually ugly with a fake picture shown online. if it was funded by the government, the process of seeing an escort would be much better in these regards.

Wouldn't it be better to just legalize prostitution and have these escorts take background checks to prevent STDs? Though I do see your point, escorts are disgustingly unregulated and risky currently.

 

[deadman123]

I also demand a MINIMUM of $2000 in neetbux a month to finance our LDAR lifestyle and prevent us from going ER
View attachment 28132

 

[Gokugetem]

read my response to anonymous MG


much better than having 0 sex

It was a low IQ response. If you are worried about catfishimg and Myspace angles, a private company playing corporate pimp would be far more effective than the government would be.... Especially if this was a "free" government service.

A private company would keep ugly women off, or make them offer cheaper prices or at least not feature them prominately on their site. Else it would cut into their bottom line.

 

[ItalianLegionary]

I beleve that once a male turns 20, the government should pay for a free sex session with an attractive female escort every year. This service is to be given to single men only.
To ensure the man is single, they must fill out a form verifying this, and this form is accessable to the public, so if a man who is already in a relationship tries to use this service, their girlfriend can find out by contacting the government to see if their boyfriend filled the form out as 'single.' Therefore the girlfriend will know if her bf has cheated on her.

I believe this service will save money for the government in the long run, as there will be no more incels, and thus less depressed people seeking therapy. In the UK, this is funded by the NHS, which means tax payer's money will be saved. It also means there will be less rape, which means less money spent by the criminal justice system.

Overall, I think this is a great idea as it will make society happier overall, and even though the government has to spend money on escorts, it will save money in the long run due to the benefits it provides.

Fucking what?

 

[MaxZM98]

It was a low IQ response. If you are worried about catfishimg and Myspace angles, a private company playing corporate pimp would be far more effective than the government would be.... Especially if this was a "free" government service.

A private company would keep ugly women off, or make them offer cheaper prices or at least not feature them prominately on their site. Else it would cut into their bottom line.

point there needs to be a safe, free, regulated service. government or not

 

[Gokugetem]

point there needs to be a safe, free, regulated service. government or not

There's that word again..... Free? What makes you think it should be free? Weren't you just complaining about all the freebies the government gives single moms? How is this any different?

And how do you expect a non-governmental entity to stay functional offering free services? Unless they are getting donations like a charity......

If you wanna argue for legalizing prostitution, that's one thing. But saying it should, or even could be free is very low IQ. No better than the welfare state women leech on to today.

 

[MaxZM98]

There's that word again..... Free? What makes you think it should be free? Weren't you just complaining about all the freebies the government gives single moms? How is this any different?

And how do you expect a non-governmental entity to stay functional offering free services? Unless they are getting donations like a charity......

If you wanna argue for legalizing prostitution, that's one thing. But saying it should, or even could be free is very low IQ. No better than the welfare state women leech on to today.

no, dumbass, i never complained about single mothers at all. Also, if you read the post in the first fucking place, i explain how this will actually save money in the long run, as well as make society a better place.

 

[Gokugetem]

no, dumbass, i never complained about single mothers at all. Also, if you read the post in the first fucking place, i explain how this will actually save money in the long run, as well as make society a better place.

Kek, you called me a dumbass yet expect anybody with an IQ in the triple digits to seriously believe this will save the government money? Don't think I can take you seriously anymore

 

[UndercovrNormie]

Bad post. Getting government subsidized pity sex won't stop anyone from feeling subhuman.

 

[VirginWithStache]

Pathetic idea.
Escorts do not help incels.

 

[4700euros]

paying for escorts can be dangerous, and the women are usually ugly with a fake picture shown online. if it was funded by the government, the process of seeing an escort would be much better in these regards.

It is not dangerous.
They arent usually ugly.
But yea...a lot of fake pictures.

 

[MaxZM98]

It is not dangerous.
They arent usually ugly.
But yea...a lot of fake pictures.

i have seen 2 escorts and they were ugly

 

[4700euros]

i have seen 2 escorts and they were ugly

I have seen more than 33 before 25 years old and only 2 were ugly.

 

[MaxZM98]

Kek, you called me a dumbass yet expect anybody with an IQ in the triple digits to seriously believe this will save the government money? Don't think I can take you seriously anymore

it's literally just 60 quid per single guy per year. do you know how much strain there is on the NHS for giving therapy?

 

[Untermenschcel]

I also demand a MINIMUM of $2000 in neetbux a month to finance our LDAR lifestyle and prevent us from going ER
View attachment 28132

Yes I like.

 

[Mickeyonacid]

even though the government has to spend money on escorts, it will save money in the long run due to the benefits it provides.

You don't need an economics degree to understand this is absolute horseshit. You're saying that for every single guy above 20, there is an "attractive female escort" ready to be paid to fuck them. Further elaboration on this point is needed if I'm going to see eye to eye with you on this.

 

[MaxZM98]

You don't need an economics degree to understand this is absolute horseshit. You're saying that for every single guy above 20, there is an "attractive female escort" ready to be paid to fuck them. Further elaboration on this point is needed if I'm going to see eye to eye with you on this.

most guys arent single. also it's once a year...most escorts have sex several times a day.

 

[Deleted member 8353]

I beleve that once a male turns 20, the government should pay for a free sex session with an attractive female escort every year. This service is to be given to single men only.

I don't even want that.

Maybe when society will guarantee me a wife then I'll start putting in effort.

 

[MaxZM98]

I don't even want that.

Maybe when society will guarantee me a wife then I'll start putting in effort.

marriage is just a scam women use to trick men out of their money.

 

[Deleted member 8353]

marriage is just a scam women use to trick men out of their money.

Well I don't care about sex, I just want a LTR with someone who wants to be with me. Obviously I wouldn't get married in our current society, but that isn't really my point.

 

[MaxZM98]

Well I don't care about sex, I just want a LTR with someone who wants to be with me. Obviously I wouldn't get married in our current society, but that isn't really my point.

alright well good luck with that

 

[Mickeyonacid]

most guys arent single. also it's once a year...most escorts have sex several times a day.

The sheer numbers don't add up
http://www.upcisam.com/about/singles-statistics/
47% of men are single
there are 119 million men in the USA
This means there are approximately 55,930,000 single men in the united states alone.
https://prostitution.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=000095
According to this, there are one to two million escorts in the united states. That means for your idea to work there will be roughly 56 men to every woman, EVERY YEAR. Assuming the government is paying for the sex, and also assuming the government is paying for the escort to travel to the single men in this scenario, how could any government possibly financially support this idea?

 

[MaxZM98]

The sheer numbers don't add up
http://www.upcisam.com/about/singles-statistics/
47% of men are single
there are 119 million men in the USA
This means there are approximately 55,930,000 single men in the united states alone.
https://prostitution.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=000095
According to this, there are one to two million escorts in the united states. That means for your idea to work there will be roughly 56 men to every woman, EVERY YEAR. Assuming the government is paying for the sex, and also assuming the government is paying for the escort to travel to the single men in this scenario, how could any government possibly financially support this idea?

i'm talking about the UK. It doesnt make sense for the USA to do this, i agree. also the man would travel

 

[Mickeyonacid]

i'm talking about the UK. It doesnt make sense for the USA to do this, i agree. also the man would travel

I used the USA as an example because it has the strongest economy and therefore has the strongest likelihood to support such a proposition, my bad. In the UK, it's a similar situation, given how there are roughly 16,292,500 single men in the UK and according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_the_United_Kingdom there are 72,800 sex workers, with 88% being female (approx. 64,064 female sex workers)
16 million / 64,000 = two hundred and fifty, which is nearly 3 times worse than the USA scenario, which means my original point stands ever stronger, especially when you consider that according to https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/022415/worlds-top-10-economies.asp, the united states is the best economy in the world while the UK comes fifth. This proposition would actually be better suited to the United States of America, given that they stand the best chance of actually supporting such an idea.

 

[universallyabhorred]

Good idea overall but another condition should be that the escort cannot refuse to sexually service an incel client.

 

[MaxZM98]

I used the USA as an example because it has the strongest economy and therefore has the strongest likelihood to support such a proposition, my bad. In the UK, it's a similar situation, given how there are roughly 16,292,500 single men in the UK and according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_the_United_Kingdom there are 72,800 sex workers, with 88% being female (approx. 64,064 female sex workers)
16 million / 64,000 = two hundred and fifty, which is nearly 3 times worse than the USA scenario, which means my original point stands ever stronger, especially when you consider that according to https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/022415/worlds-top-10-economies.asp, the united states is the best economy in the world while the UK comes fifth. This proposition would actually be better suited to the United States of America, given that they stand the best chance of actually supporting such an idea.

lol u actually went and did some research? I'm pretty sure not all single men will be using this service. If there arent enough escorts, at least they should do it once to make sure no guy has to be a virgin, because losing virginity is a human right. every man deserves to have sex with an attractive woman at least once in their life, because life is so cruel if you do not know what it's like to experience that.

 

[Deleted member 3291]

let me fuck a loli then ok

 

[last_man]

here's a policy idea: we keep mass immigration, but the immigrants are all women who are assigned to incels as gfs

 

[Mickeyonacid]

lol u actually went and did some research?

Yes

I'm pretty sure not all single men will be using this service.

You're correct, we can assume maybe 5-10% of single men over 20 won't be desperate enough to take advantage of this hypothetical service.

If there arent enough escorts, at least they should do it once to make sure no guy has to be a virgin, because losing virginity is a human right. every man deserves to have sex with an attractive woman at least once in their life, because life is so cruel if you do not know what it's like to experience that.

I agree with this bit, but for reasons aforementioned this would be impossible. It's a good idea in theory, but once picked apart it would fail to survive in any established government on earth today.

 

[Robtical]

Femoid's and single mom whores get tons of free shit from the government. Incels should at least get an attractive hooker once a week, not once a year. Might as well still be incel if you only get sex once a year with a hooker.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

Doesn't help. It's not about sex, it's about validation and feeling attractive and worthy of a sexual partner, government funding escorts won't change anything, fucking an escort is probably a lot like fucking a fleshlight, if fleshlights were loose, used-up, dirty, STD ridden. It would probably be also awkward as fuck.

 

[Evildoer]

Looks theory should be widely accepted first, otherwise everyone would claim "incel" to get free hookers.

 

[MaxZM98]

here's a policy idea: we keep mass immigration, but the immigrants are all women who are assigned to incels as gfs

very high IQ post.

 

[Robtical]

Doesn't help. It's not about sex, it's about validation and feeling attractive and worthy of a sexual partner, government funding escorts won't change anything, fucking an escort is probably a lot like fucking a fleshlight, if fleshlights were loose, used-up, dirty, STD ridden. It would probably be also awkward as fuck.

Says every guy whose never fucked a good quality hooker.

 

[backyardslayer]

I also demand a MINIMUM of $2000 in neetbux a month to finance our LDAR lifestyle and prevent us from going ER
View attachment 28132

Just welfaremaxx bro.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

Says every guy whose never fucked a good quality hooker.

What I said was true, and you know it, whether you agree with it or not. These "government provided escorts" would be cheap, dirty and STD ridden, and I thought most incels don't want to support women making money because of their bodies.

 

[Robtical]

What I said was true, and you know it, whether you agree with it or not. These "government provided escorts" would be cheap, dirty and STD ridden, and I thought most incels don't want to support women making money because of their bodies.

They will have to be tested, and they will be at least above a 5 in looks. As long as you wear a condom and hit it from the back, it doesn't matter how much the bitch is "validating" you. Women make more money off their bodies from cucks and orbiters because prostitution is illegal and we don't have tax funded hookers in the first place.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

They will have to be tested, and they will be at least above a 5 in looks. As long as you wear a condom and hit it from the back, it doesn't matter how much the bitch is "validating" you. Women make more money off their bodies from cucks and orbiters because prostitution is illegal and we don't have tax funded hookers in the first place.

And who says that they will be at least a 5, and who decides who is a five or not, and who says they will be tested, and even if they were, what would be the point of this. Everyone can get money to fuck hookers, what would some used-up cumdoll funded by money from thef- taxation I mean, help.

 

[Robtical]

And who says that they will be at least a 5, and who decides who is a five or not, and who says they will be tested, and even if they were, what would be the point of this. Everyone can get money to fuck hookers, what would some used-up cumdoll funded by money from thef- taxation I mean, help.

Most guys don't have enough money to afford a 5/10 hooker once a week. Femoids get all their shit funded by the government, so hookers are the least men should get. There will be a lot of variety of escorts, so you can pick whichever one out of the 5's you like. Hookers will be tested once a month mandatorily, if they fail then they'll get kicked off the government hooker program until they fix it.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

I don't want the gouvernment to intervene in my personal life.

What about validation?
I sure as shit won't feel that if the gouvernment mollycoddles my asshole, giving me an unreluctant piece of roast to fuck while she pouts and tosses insults at me, it won't replace sex with actual attachment where the two parties are attracted to each other and thus i'd rather do without.
Horrendeous idea.

Bad post. Getting government subsidized pity sex won't stop anyone from feeling subhuman.