I often see the importance of height, frame, face and what order they should come in debated in this forum. Most of us agree face trumps the other two by quite a long way. But height and frame fall under the same criteria in the mind of a woman, ‘size’ is a far more apt way to encompass these two commodities which are, in my opinion, one and the same when it comes to female attraction and response. I realised this the other day when a friend of mine teased another, calling him a ‘midget’ despite the fact he’s 5’11, he was not pleased with this label, and proceed to profess his height, and is actually above average for our group. He has a very slight frame which massively affects his perceived size, regardless of height. People have often mistaken us for the same height despite the fact I am 5’8 and he’s 5’11. I assume we are probably about the same weight and that for this reason, when side by side our perceived size is relatively similar.
Think about it, Tom Hardy and Steve Carell are the same height, though in the eyes of women, and even men, I can guarantee that Hardy is perceived to be taller due to his frame. Another example is Nathan Fielder, who is average height (5’10) yet appears a lot smaller on camera due to his minuscule frame. No one at first glance would perceive him to be taller than a guy like Tom Hardy or Jason Statham (also 5’9). In conclusion, height and frame are not so different, it is overall perceived size OPS (a combination of the two) which will ultimately determine weather or not you are deemed as attractive, and one either way is useless without the other.
It would be interesting to see if we can develop an equation that accurately measures OPS by taking into account the percentage of importance required for both commodities.
Think about it, Tom Hardy and Steve Carell are the same height, though in the eyes of women, and even men, I can guarantee that Hardy is perceived to be taller due to his frame. Another example is Nathan Fielder, who is average height (5’10) yet appears a lot smaller on camera due to his minuscule frame. No one at first glance would perceive him to be taller than a guy like Tom Hardy or Jason Statham (also 5’9). In conclusion, height and frame are not so different, it is overall perceived size OPS (a combination of the two) which will ultimately determine weather or not you are deemed as attractive, and one either way is useless without the other.
It would be interesting to see if we can develop an equation that accurately measures OPS by taking into account the percentage of importance required for both commodities.
