Chad is bored of their fesikh hole
Anal is gross. I wouldn't even pound Stacy's bootyhole.
Based and true, anal is for faeces-loving faggots
D
I've realised that I despise listening to women talk about their "lays" as if it's something to be proud of. Outing themselves out as whores - and they do it so casually. What does she honestly think this quirky experience says about her?
When Chad have spare-time and jerks off at Pornhub be like.
It's gross if she hasn't prepared for the anal. Before the penetration, the foid should eat light meals like salads and typa sheit mang. So that there is shit when you penetrate but it's apparently good brocel
. 4chan states that a foids hole has a stronger grip compared to her roast beef flaps
Niggas really have to plan out a dietary schedule for their degeneracy. I'd rather just put my dick where nature intended.It's gross if she hasn't prepared for the anal. Before the penetration, the foid should eat light meals like salads and typa sheit mang. So that there is shit when you penetrate but it's apparently good brocel
agreed. I refuse to ever do itBased and true, anal is for faeces-loving faggots
You guys realize a vagina is way dirtier than an anus, right? Foids don't even use condoms anymore they just let Chad's diseased cock go in raw. Vaginas have dried up cum, urine, blood, and vaginal cheese in them, not to mention any STDs that the dudes pumped in her.
used up cumdump
every relationship? you can only imagine
forced? 0 agency gender
Chad gets so tired of pussy he now wants anal
Anal is disgusting tbh faggot sex
all holes are for filling
Why Women Engage in Anal Intercourse: Results
from a Qualitative Study
November 2014 · Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(4)
DOI:10.1007/s10508-014-0367-2
Source · PubMed
License · CC BY 4.0
Abstract
This study used qualitative methods to assess why
women engage in heterosexual anal (receptive)
intercourse (AI) with a male partner. Four focus
groups which comprised women from diverse
ethnicities were conducted. All groups were
digitally recorded for transcription; transcripts
were analyzed using the methods of grounded
theory to determine themes. Women's reasons for
engaging in anal intercourse with a male partner
can be described in broad categories including that
the women wanted to have anal intercourse, either
because of their own desire, to please a male
partner, or they were responding to a quid pro quo
situation. The riskiness of AI was assessed within
relationship contexts. Past experience with AI
including emotional and physical reactions was
identified. Among the negative physical experiences
of AI were pain and disliking the sensation, and
uncomfortable side effects, such as bleeding of the
rectum. Negative emotional experiences of AI
included feelings of shame, disgust, and being
offended by something her male partner did, such
as spitting on his penis for lubrication. Positive
physical experiences included liking the sensation.
Many of the women also endorsed positive
emotional experiences of AI, including that it was
more intimate than vaginal sex, and that it was
something they reserved only for special partners.
The majority of AI episodes were unplanned and
not discussed prior to initiation. Pain during AI was
mitigated by the use of lubricants or illicit drugs.
Even those women who found pleasure in AI
expressed a preference for vaginal intercourse.
from a Qualitative Study
November 2014 · Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(4)
DOI:10.1007/s10508-014-0367-2
Source · PubMed
License · CC BY 4.0
Abstract
This study used qualitative methods to assess why
women engage in heterosexual anal (receptive)
intercourse (AI) with a male partner. Four focus
groups which comprised women from diverse
ethnicities were conducted. All groups were
digitally recorded for transcription; transcripts
were analyzed using the methods of grounded
theory to determine themes. Women's reasons for
engaging in anal intercourse with a male partner
can be described in broad categories including that
the women wanted to have anal intercourse, either
because of their own desire, to please a male
partner, or they were responding to a quid pro quo
situation. The riskiness of AI was assessed within
relationship contexts. Past experience with AI
including emotional and physical reactions was
identified. Among the negative physical experiences
of AI were pain and disliking the sensation, and
uncomfortable side effects, such as bleeding of the
rectum. Negative emotional experiences of AI
included feelings of shame, disgust, and being
offended by something her male partner did, such
as spitting on his penis for lubrication. Positive
physical experiences included liking the sensation.
Many of the women also endorsed positive
emotional experiences of AI, including that it was
more intimate than vaginal sex, and that it was
something they reserved only for special partners.
The majority of AI episodes were unplanned and
not discussed prior to initiation. Pain during AI was
mitigated by the use of lubricants or illicit drugs.
Even those women who found pleasure in AI
expressed a preference for vaginal intercourse.
tbh
R
The other holes been too used. It’s why they are going for the less used hole by mistake.
Smells about as good as their literal shithole
Must be a normie thing. They all seem to be into it. They see it in jew porn and love it like everything jews show them.
Based and true, anal is for faeces-loving faggots
Anal is the ultimate FOID worship imo, other than eating ass. It is literally saying that that foids body is so Devine that you are happy touching the dirtiest part of it
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
