Theory Forbidding all sex except prostitution is the best solution to inceldom

[K9Otaku]

Here is how it would work :

1. No sex at all allowed except as explained below. Unlawful sex --> death
2. Chads and Stacys selected at puberty and put in brothels for life. No other jobs allowed for them. Men purchase sex from stacys, Women from Chads.
3. Prostitution is the only form of sex allowed.
4. No prostitute (male or female) can refuse sex to a customer.
5. Babies born to surrogate mothers following artificial insemination or some other procedure not involving sex.
6. Children educated by institutions financed by a tax on the future earnings of their pupils. This way, highly practical, no-nonsense education is encouraged. The reason parents are bad today is because they do not expect future revenue from their kids. As a result, they indulge their fantasies instead of educating them properly.
7. Strict separation of sexes during childhood.
8. Only low-key clothing (uniform-like) allowed outside brothels to make it clear that life is not about seduction. Offenders prosecuted without mercy.
9. No welfare at all. You get sick, you pay out of your own pocket or you die. Too old to work, you pay your own retirement or you die.
10. Charity is allowed but only by private individuals and to benefit people they directly know (no charity orgs)
11. Private property allowed, creating businesses allowed, business law pretty much as we know it today (it is quite good; I am not talking about cucked labour laws or family law, only business law).

 

[PPEcel]

How does pricing work in these brothels and such? I'm guessing poorcels still won't be able to afford regular sex.

 

[K9Otaku]

How does pricing work in these brothels and such? I'm guessing poorcels still won't be able to afford regular sex.

You can guarantee freedom and the absence of cuckness. You cannot guarantee results.

Guaranteed results (socialism) is the bluepillest idea and the reason behind a lot of today's cuckdom.

Brothels can charge whatever they want and customers do whatever they need to pay. What I would agree to is a regulation of the prostitution market so that rich clients cannot monopolize prostitutes (a kind of anti-trust law). Let us say that any given prostitute is not allowed to service the same customer more than once a week. That way, rich customers would be unable to transform any given prostitute into a concubine/[UWSL]sicisbeo[/UWSL]

[UWSL]Being poor is bad. There is no way around it. Providing a level playing field (free economics + absence of sexual distortion) for people to work and compete in is the best way to avoid it. Trying to guarantee anything apart from the market always backfires (welfare cucked us bad).[/UWSL]

 

[Deleted member 41809]

Dumbest thread ever made on this forum

 

[faded]

You can guarantee freedom and the absence of cuckness. You cannot guarantee results.

Guaranteed results (socialism) is the bluepillest idea and the reason behind a lot of today's cuckdom.

Brothels can charge whatever they want and customers do whatever they need to pay. What I would agree to is a regulation of the prostitution market so that rich clients cannot monopolize prostitutes (a kind of anti-trust law). Let us say that any given prostitute is not allowed to service the same customer more than once a week. That way, rich customers would be unable to transform any given prostitute into a concubine/[UWSL]sicisbeo[/UWSL]

[UWSL]Being poor is bad. There is no way around it. Providing a level playing field (free economics + absence of sexual distortion) for people to work and compete in is the best way to avoid it. Trying to guarantee anything apart from the market always backfires (welfare cucked us bad).[/UWSL]

Good idea goyim

 

[JayGoptri]

You can guarantee freedom and the absence of cuckness. You cannot guarantee results.

Guaranteed results (socialism) is the bluepillest idea and the reason behind a lot of today's cuckdom.

Brothels can charge whatever they want and customers do whatever they need to pay. What I would agree to is a regulation of the prostitution market so that rich clients cannot monopolize prostitutes (a kind of anti-trust law). Let us say that any given prostitute is not allowed to service the same customer more than once a week. That way, rich customers would be unable to transform any given prostitute into a concubine/[UWSL]sicisbeo[/UWSL]

[UWSL]Being poor is bad. There is no way around it. Providing a level playing field (free economics + absence of sexual distortion) for people to work and compete in is the best way to avoid it. Trying to guarantee anything apart from the market always backfires (welfare cucked us bad).[/UWSL]

Like I said before, if it was this way from the time I was born, things may have been better off.

But is there a regulatory rule that could do a bit more than limit the rich to once a week? What about if, like taxes, the service was bracketed according to one's IRS statement and income?

I think this might satisfy the concern @PPEcel is asking about.

 

[K9Otaku]

Dumbest thread ever made on this forum

Ok. So you are just taking a little dump here and then you are on your merry way. Very helpful!

Could you at least say what your objections are?

 

[K9Otaku]

But is there a regulatory rule that could do a bit more than limit the rich to once a week? What about if, like taxes, the service was bracketed according to one's IRS statement and income?

Too complicated. Rules need to be simple.

I think this might satisfy the concern @PPEcel is asking about.

This concerned should not be satisfied, because it is part of the problem.

 

[K9Otaku]

Good idea goyim

uh?

 

[Deleted member 41809]

Ok. So you are just taking a little dump here and then you are on your merry way. Very helpful!

Could you at least say what your objections are?

Fuck you kike eat my shit you fucking jewish bastard I hope you get banned again

 

[JayGoptri]

Too complicated. Rules need to be simple.

This concerned should not be satisfied, because it is part of the problem.

How do people of lower income attend brothels?

 

[K9Otaku]

Fuck you kike eat my shit you fucking jewish bastard I hope you get banned again

Reported for insults.

What is wrong with you? I am not even Jewish. I am Jap

 

[K9Otaku]

How do people of lower income attend brothels?

Like they do other things, by getting less poor.

In a society that is fair and non-sexually distorted, there is no reason to stay poor very long.

In the 40s in the US, everyone was rich enough to buy a bicycle, then a fridge, a car and finally a house.

You could fall on hard times but it was always temporary. Jobs were plentiful and they all taught you some new skills that increased your value (and your salary) rapidly.

The goal of the rules outlined above are to return to something similar. Again, results are never guaranteed. We have to accept that.

 

[K9Otaku]

So if we ban everyone else from having sex we'll stop being incels? Ok cuckold fetishist

Reported for insults ("cuckold fetishist")

If we ban sex apart from prostitution, we avoid distorting society with sexual prestige. In that context, there are no incels. Only people who work in order to afford prostitutes (and other stuff)

 

[JayGoptri]

Like they do other things, by getting less poor.

In a society that is fair and non-sexually distorted, there is no reason to stay poor very long.

Yes, that's true.

In the 40s in the US, everyone was rich enough to buy a bicycle, then a fridge, a car and finally a house.

You could fall on hard times but it was always temporary. Jobs were plentiful and they all taught you some new skills that increased your value (and your salary) rapidly.

The goal of the rules outlined above are to return to something similar. Again, results are never guaranteed. We have to accept that.

Ahh makes sense. It's what I was hovering around when I said something to the effect of "if it was this way from the start we'd be better off". Thanks for the clarification.

 

[K9Otaku]

If you have a better idea, we are all ears ...

 

[JayGoptri]

Fuck you kike eat my shit you fucking jewish bastard I hope you get banned again

When you don't understand something someone has said, either ask a question or be silent !

 

[JayGoptri]

So if we ban everyone else from having sex we'll stop being incels? Ok cuckold fetishist

That's not what was written Ray. Read the details !

 

[SoloAlex]

Nobody cares about a solution for Inceldom.

 

[K9Otaku]

nuke it from orbit... it's the only way to be sure

then start over

Ok, but when you "start over", what principles do you follow?

The list of rules listed above is precisely for a "post apocalyptic" scenario. I am well aware that there is no way to implement them now

 

[K9Otaku]

Nobody cares about a solution for Inceldom.

Even incels on a forum called Incels.is ?

Why are they here then ?

 

[K9Otaku]

Where's the insult lol? Thats what you said you were

No, I did not say that. But since the thread was nuked from orbit, there is no way to check, is there?

 

[Pixycel]

this one of the most autistic and simultaneously most retarded threads I've seen on this site.
Good job OP

 

[SoloAlex]

Even incels on a forum called Incels.is ?

Why are they here then ?

With „nobody“ I meant our society

 

[K9Otaku]

With „nobody“ I meant our society

But we incels do care, right?

 

[K9Otaku]

there is no humanity left after my solution

so I would just let evolution try again with three eyed nuclear fish or whatnot

rinse, repeat

What makes you think the result would be better?

 

[SoloAlex]

But we incels do care, right?

Yes, but we are a minority

 

[K9Otaku]

this one of the most autistic and simultaneously most retarded threads I've seen on this site.

Why are we here ?

Because we are incels.

Inceldom is not fun, right?

Yes. So that is why we all want a solution to inceldom ....

Ooops no, not @Pixycel

So what does @Pixycel want ? He is an incel (or so he says) and he presumably does not enjoy it. Yet, he does not want a solution to inceldom.

So what is he doing here? Vent? Attract attention to himself? Pour disdain on people for the fun of it? Be an edgelord to shore up his flagging sense of self?

Take your pick.

 

[K9Otaku]

Yes, but we are a minority

Small groups can start things differently after a catastrophe. And a catastrophe is certainly coming in one form or another.

 

[SoloAlex]

Small groups can start things differently after a catastrophe. And a catastrophe is certainly coming in one form or another.

Well then make a thread how to start the Incel revolution bc this is the big elephant in the room.

 

[K9Otaku]

Well then make a thread how to start the Incel revolution bc this is the big elephant in the room.

No need for a revolution. Just wait for the world to collapse on its own (it is quite close to it, I am pretty sure). Then wait for the smoke to clear and start over in a little far off corner. After a real catastrophe, the population will have decreased drastically, so there will be plenty of space.

 

[JayGoptri]

this one of the most autistic and simultaneously most retarded threads I've seen on this site.
Good job OP

Ersatz Chad behavior. You're trying to profit off the confusion and the immaturity. And I think you are unable to ask questions when you don't understand something.

Nobody cares about a solution for Inceldom.

It's the solution for cultural malfunction and cultural decay which we try to understand and then apply, if/when we are able. There would likely be less of an Inceldom problem if that was reality.

 

[Pixycel]

You're trying to profit off the confusion and the immaturity.

I'm not trying to "profit" off of anything. I just thought his idea was poorly thought out and just seems like a edgy post for attention on IT.

"yet bro we are going to enslave chads and stacys at birth(even though we have zero clue how attractive someone will be that early in life) and no other sex is allowed but paying for it at privately owned mega brothels that will jack up the price! take that normal fags! and we'll reproduce via artificial insemination instead of actual sex which is a lot easier. How are we going to make sure people don't have sex behind close doors? idk bro make it illegal. No one has ever broken the law before!"

He does have some good ideas but most just seem short sighted and seem more geared towards making a thread to "shock the cucks and foids" instead of having an actual discussion imo.

I think you are unable to ask questions when you don't understand something.

No, I do, Infact I have a question right now. Why do you always dick ride @K9Otaku in every single thread?

 

[grondilu]

No welfare at all. You get sick, you pay out of your own pocket or you die. Too old to work, you pay your own retirement or you die.

This, but unironically.

 

[grondilu]

No sex at all allowed except as explained below. Unlawful sex --> death

In a way that's how it has been until only very recently, at least in Abrahamic societies.

Sex was not stricto-sensu prohibited, but it was taboo. You absolutely couldn't do it in public, and it was rude to even talk about it, so we were all pretending nobody ever had sex. We were basically all acting like children until marriage.

Even today, it still is forbidden to have sex in public. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but I'd like to point out how how little difference there is between banning an act and only allowing it in private.

As far as I know, the only society that went as far as explicitly banning sex was the Shakers.

Shakers - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Loner94]

Interesting

 

[JayGoptri]

I'm not trying to "profit" off of anything. I just thought his idea was poorly thought out and just seems like a edgy post for attention on IT.

Then do it without sounding like someone who is above the ideas being put forward. You're not above it, but calling it "autistic" and "retarded" is an attempt to portray yourself as "better" or smarter. And you're neither of the two. This I know for a fact.

"yet bro we are going to enslave chads and stacys at birth(even though we have zero clue how attractive someone will be that early in life) and no other sex is allowed but paying for it at privately owned mega brothels that will jack up the price! take that normal fags! and we'll reproduce via artificial insemination instead of actual sex which is a lot easier. How are we going to make sure people don't have sex behind close doors? idk bro make it illegal. No one has ever broken the law before!".

It's just a thought experiment or proposal. People do that on here. If you're not understanding it, ask questions. Don't act like a punk !

He does have some good ideas but most just seem short sighted and seem more geared towards making a thread to "shock the cucks and foids" instead of having an actual discussion imo.

Then say that and shut up. Once. And now I have a few questions for you - what do mean by "actual discussion".. you don't think what's happening here is an "actual discussion"? What does an "actual discussion" entail for you?

No, I do, Infact I have a question right now. Why do you always dick ride @K9Otaku in every single thread?

I know him irl. I know his ideas. On the site, I reply when I have a question, when he tags me, or if I have a comment. I support his ideas if/when they make sense to me in accordance with my own experiences. What you mean by "riding dick" is actually; the act of following suit with someone who sometimes may have more experience or knowledge to impart than you do. The reason you call it "dick riding" is because you are too insecure to accept any sort of code above yourself, and also, because you are probably traumatized by not having had sex with a woman, (which is understandable) so unfortunately, anytime a man agrees with/supports another man to your dismay, you make it into a homosexual reference.

 

[JayGoptri]

No, I do, Infact I have a question right now. Why do you always dick ride @K9Otaku in every single thread?

One other thing:

I am trying to bring a higher standard of discussion to this forum and site. If that involves supporting someone (whoever it is) who I think is doing that, then I will do it.

Now let's see if you can answer my questions as genuinely and earnestly as I have answered yours !

 

[faded]

Fuck you kike eat my shit you fucking jewish bastard I hope you get banned again

Hey you better stop it with the antisemitism

 

[Deleted member 41364]

Here is how it would work :

1. No sex at all allowed except as explained below. Unlawful sex --> death
2. Chads and Stacys selected at puberty and put in brothels for life. No other jobs allowed for them. Men purchase sex from stacys, Women from Chads.
3. Prostitution is the only form of sex allowed.
4. No prostitute (male or female) can refuse sex to a customer.
5. Babies born to surrogate mothers following artificial insemination or some other procedure not involving sex.
6. Children educated by institutions financed by a tax on the future earnings of their pupils. This way, highly practical, no-nonsense education is encouraged. The reason parents are bad today is because they do not expect future revenue from their kids. As a result, they indulge their fantasies instead of educating them properly.
7. Strict separation of sexes during childhood.
8. Only low-key clothing (uniform-like) allowed outside brothels to make it clear that life is not about seduction. Offenders prosecuted without mercy.
9. No welfare at all. You get sick, you pay out of your own pocket or you die. Too old to work, you pay your own retirement or you die.
10. Charity is allowed but only by private individuals and to benefit people they directly know (no charity orgs)
11. Private property allowed, creating businesses allowed, business law pretty much as we know it today (it is quite good; I am not talking about cucked labour laws or family law, only business law).

Based and Giverpilled.

 

[K9Otaku]

"yet bro we are going to enslave chads and stacys at birth(even though we have zero clue how attractive someone will be that early in life)

I said "at puberty". Can you read?

 

[K9Otaku]

In a way that's how it has been until only very recently, at least in Abrahamic societies.

That is basically the other way to end (or at least mitigate) inceldom: go back to traditional values with definite gender roles and arranged marriages.

I may be mistaken but it seems to me than going back to that would be harder than setting up what I suggest

 

[K9Otaku]

How are we going to make sure people don't have sex behind close doors? idk bro make it illegal. No one has ever broken the law before!"

It does not matter if that happens a little. If people do it risking death, they will be doing it a lot less.

In traditional societies, adultery existed on the margins. Yet there were no incels

He does have some good ideas but most just seem short sighted and seem more geared towards making a thread to "shock the cucks and foids" instead of having an actual discussion imo.

That is called "confession through projection"

 

[capitalcuck]

No looksmatching in this world?

 

[K9Otaku]

No looksmatching in this world?

No. Looksmatching is a problem too. When you are really ugly, who wants to fuck his looksmatch?

 

[JestER]

Dumbest thread ever made on this forum

There was a reason why this faggot got banned in the first place, it should've stayed that way. The best solution to inceldom is to ban sex for all normies and above, while only allowing incels to breed with the top-tier Stacies by force. Enslave all the normies, Chads and beckies to do the dirty work/become cannon fodder, then designate all Stacies to breeding duties with ugly sub5 and below men while forcing them to marry said subhuman men. Send any dissidents to the gulags or execute them if they resist, purge all cuckoldy from this world once and for all

 

[Lawrence]

Women buy sex from Chads

-
Women don't wanna buy sex from a stranger, LOL

(You can observe this fact by noting the almost non-existent market in man-whores)

 

[Indari]

big brother is watching you

 

[K9Otaku]

-
Women don't wanna buy sex from a stranger, LOL

(You can observe this fact by noting the almost non-existent market in man-whores)

If there are no other opportunities, they will do it.

Male prostitute brothels would have to have more elaborate procedures to get foids aroused, like simulating the inside of a discotheque and providing a back story of some kind. Also, some foids might pay to be simul-raped by BBCs in a dark alley, etc

 

[JayGoptri]

No. Looksmatching is a problem too. When you are really ugly, who wants to fuck his looksmatch?

Based.