![78980n](/data/avatars/m/19/19220.jpg?1703106926)
78980n
ツ
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2019
- Posts
- 11,082
Example:
Guy: "Guys, remember - she's probably texting other guys too"
Woman, in response: "Until I make a clear verbal commitment, I can text who I want. Sorry."
At first this appears like a sound moral statement or whatever, she's in control of herself and can do as she pleases, ect.
But if you just think about it for more than a minute these affirmations of women's autonomy are just women trying to advance their own strategy. In the case above, a woman is saying this to be able to keep multiple men in orbit with things just short of a "verbal commitment", to have these men available if needed. In case a guy complains about this, she can whip out this statement o
to affirm her autonomy and then he appears to be in the wrong. In reality: These guys get a girl leading them on where they might even develop oneitis. It's not likely that most of these men are are talking with multiple women, but only with the girl leading them on, hence it's understandable they would be upset if they find out she's talking with multiple men. They're frustrated about how much more sexual power women hold compared to them.
Water is wet post but the point is that I don't understand how so many men fall for these moral statements women say to justify their whore behavior. These things wouldn't even need to be said if men and women didn't have differences in mating value, so it's a blackpill in of itself.
Guy: "Guys, remember - she's probably texting other guys too"
Woman, in response: "Until I make a clear verbal commitment, I can text who I want. Sorry."
At first this appears like a sound moral statement or whatever, she's in control of herself and can do as she pleases, ect.
But if you just think about it for more than a minute these affirmations of women's autonomy are just women trying to advance their own strategy. In the case above, a woman is saying this to be able to keep multiple men in orbit with things just short of a "verbal commitment", to have these men available if needed. In case a guy complains about this, she can whip out this statement o
to affirm her autonomy and then he appears to be in the wrong. In reality: These guys get a girl leading them on where they might even develop oneitis. It's not likely that most of these men are are talking with multiple women, but only with the girl leading them on, hence it's understandable they would be upset if they find out she's talking with multiple men. They're frustrated about how much more sexual power women hold compared to them.
Water is wet post but the point is that I don't understand how so many men fall for these moral statements women say to justify their whore behavior. These things wouldn't even need to be said if men and women didn't have differences in mating value, so it's a blackpill in of itself.