I was having some guys over the other day and we had just about right amount of drinks to start talking about weird topics, and one of those topics struck gold...
We were exploring different scenarios but what would happen if there were too few women in the world or too few men... and we realized something about the world...
If the men to women ratio was 50 - 50 (like it more or less is now) and it was up to men each man would have on woman, we see that in the form of arranged marriages in the past.
But if women are left to chose they would always go for the elite of the elite of male samples and would never settle for less of what they think is the best. They don't mind being one of Chads side chick.
If there are less women than men, regardless of how many men there are in the world, women would always go for the elite of the elite.
While If it was up to men, men would try to organize and share what they had in the form of a pyramid scheme, some type of tests of worthiness would be needed before you could get a wife. We can see that in some historical references where villages where raided and the young, good looking girls where taken away and the villagers had to move on.
In both of those those scenarios if women are left to chose they will form a harem around the most attractive men they can get their hand on.
They don't want their own man they want to take turns in sharing the best dude.
Unfortunately the current birth rate data say that we get 105 boys born for every 100 girls.
So if our little thought experiment here is anything to go by, it explains why women act the way they do.
However here is the interesting part...
If there are considerably more women than men say there are 2 to 3 women for every man. Women form group together to become a mans girlfriends they don't even wait to get a turn. This what is happening in a Chinese city called Dongguan where every man has about 2 to 4 girlfriends. Another interesting fact is that infidelity in Dongguan is almost zero.
Historically men would die off much faster and more frequently than women would in the past. War, work accidents, exploring new dangerous areas on the planet. Most boys would not survive to become adults, and most adults would not live long enough to have children. So in the past you use to have multiple wives, servants and concubines in your house because if they where not in your house they would homeless, hungry and unprotected. That is true for more of the ancient world. So women use to treat men better not only because of what they offered but also because they where so rare.
So my theory is that women as a collective would treat people better If they had more competition for men's attention.
Say for example if there where mostly female births for a few years most of our social issues would go away.
All the discrimination, looking down at us, shaming tactics even their code of conduct would change I think.
If I am right about this and if we could just find a way to get more girls born than boys then women would start fighting each other instead of fighting us.
What do you guys think?
We were exploring different scenarios but what would happen if there were too few women in the world or too few men... and we realized something about the world...
If the men to women ratio was 50 - 50 (like it more or less is now) and it was up to men each man would have on woman, we see that in the form of arranged marriages in the past.
But if women are left to chose they would always go for the elite of the elite of male samples and would never settle for less of what they think is the best. They don't mind being one of Chads side chick.
If there are less women than men, regardless of how many men there are in the world, women would always go for the elite of the elite.
While If it was up to men, men would try to organize and share what they had in the form of a pyramid scheme, some type of tests of worthiness would be needed before you could get a wife. We can see that in some historical references where villages where raided and the young, good looking girls where taken away and the villagers had to move on.
In both of those those scenarios if women are left to chose they will form a harem around the most attractive men they can get their hand on.
They don't want their own man they want to take turns in sharing the best dude.
Unfortunately the current birth rate data say that we get 105 boys born for every 100 girls.
So if our little thought experiment here is anything to go by, it explains why women act the way they do.
However here is the interesting part...
If there are considerably more women than men say there are 2 to 3 women for every man. Women form group together to become a mans girlfriends they don't even wait to get a turn. This what is happening in a Chinese city called Dongguan where every man has about 2 to 4 girlfriends. Another interesting fact is that infidelity in Dongguan is almost zero.
Historically men would die off much faster and more frequently than women would in the past. War, work accidents, exploring new dangerous areas on the planet. Most boys would not survive to become adults, and most adults would not live long enough to have children. So in the past you use to have multiple wives, servants and concubines in your house because if they where not in your house they would homeless, hungry and unprotected. That is true for more of the ancient world. So women use to treat men better not only because of what they offered but also because they where so rare.
So my theory is that women as a collective would treat people better If they had more competition for men's attention.
Say for example if there where mostly female births for a few years most of our social issues would go away.
All the discrimination, looking down at us, shaming tactics even their code of conduct would change I think.
If I am right about this and if we could just find a way to get more girls born than boys then women would start fighting each other instead of fighting us.
What do you guys think?
