I've noticed a lot of confusion on this forum and in the larger so called "manosphere" when it comes to the sexual market value of females. The general contention goes that, as the result of having hundreds and often times thousands of males to choose from literally at the swipe of their finger, females can choose what and who they want at any given time, meaning that female SMV is inflated into infinity while male SMV decreases. While this is somewhat true, there is a fundamental error in this way of viewing sexual dynamics between the genders, and that is the assumption of equality in the sexual selection patterns between men and women. If one looks at a chart over what percentage of men are considered attractive by foids, and what percentage of foids are considered attractive by men, one can very quickly detect an unevenness in the two different distributions. It isn't that foids turn down what they consider to be attractive men because they almost certainly have better mates waiting for them at the swipe of a finger, it's that they literally do not find 80% of males attractive at all, whereas males' evaluation of female attractiveness follows a normal distribution. If it was true that an 8/10 male is SMVmatched by a 6/10 foid, then one would expect that couples of these sorts settle down and have kids in significant numbers. Clearly that isn't what's happening. Instead what's happening is that foids THINK they have a higher SMV than what they actually have, which then results in them pursuing guys that are ABOVE their actual SMV. The result of this is that Chad gets a vast array of foids to choose from, as foids are turning down their looksmatch in favor of chasing Chad, which then almost invariably results in them getting pumped and dumped. This is of course a fine arrangement for Chad as he sure doesn't mind getting his dick soaked inside a new pussy each night, but females, at least the overwhelming bulk of them, want to feel like they belong to a man, and become increasingly embittered by the ever growing experiences of getting pumped and dumped by different Chads, and start hating ALL men as the result (which ironically only manifests in hatred of sub8s as she can't help herself but to always love Chad). This is how the 80/20 principe, or the pareto principle is maintained, and Chad's virtual monopoly over the top 80% of the female population is secured
So to summarize, the sum of attraction that foids feel for all men gets concentrated in the top 20% of males while males' rating of female attractiveness follows an even distribution. This means that a 9/10 Gigachad SMVmogs the living crap out of a 9/10 GigaStacy and that a 4/10 foid mogs the living crap out of a 4/10 male. I realize that this may seem like a water is wet kind of post, but it's an error that I see repeated very often on here
So to summarize, the sum of attraction that foids feel for all men gets concentrated in the top 20% of males while males' rating of female attractiveness follows an even distribution. This means that a 9/10 Gigachad SMVmogs the living crap out of a 9/10 GigaStacy and that a 4/10 foid mogs the living crap out of a 4/10 male. I realize that this may seem like a water is wet kind of post, but it's an error that I see repeated very often on here
Last edited:
