ANTAGONIST
Anti-Ogre activist
★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2026
- Posts
- 4,856
- Online time
- 3d 22h
This is the purest form of hypocrisy there is. Foids claiming that them not wanting to date the male equivalent of themselves (in terms of looks) is somehow "natural selection", but doing all sorts of things that go against nature and natural selection.
I sure hope i don't need to explain why foids being picky is not related to "natural selection" in any meaningful way. There are other threads that do it better than me anyway.
incels.is
incels.is
Foids don't actually value natural selection, they just use it incorrectly as a shield to prevent themselves from admitting that they are shallow and hateful people. If foids actually cared about survival of the fittest, then they would not seek medical help in case of a health complication, infection, injury etc and let "natural selection" deal with it. Everything that we do in a civilized society goes against NATURAL selection.
Now if foids like to insist that their sexual choices (in a matriarchal antinatalist world) are equivalent to natural selection (which they are not) then they should recognize females getting STDs, having abusive relationships where the man beats them, single mothers, a man that leaves them, etc also as natural selection. However it seems that most of them don't want to do it, because that would dispell the notion that female sexual selection leads to good outcomes. What is even more absurd is that they don't seem to learn from their mistakes in many cases, usually the foid falling victim to those things i mentioned, happen to do it again.
We must also not forget that the idea of feminism goes against natural selection. The lesson that can be learned from this is that women don't care about principles, they only care about what benefits them personally in the short term, but they have no problem pretending to care about principles to achieve the latter.
I sure hope i don't need to explain why foids being picky is not related to "natural selection" in any meaningful way. There are other threads that do it better than me anyway.
“Women are eugenicists n shiet”
No the fuck they aren’t, and you’re literally foid-worshipping and giving their slutdom credit when you make brainmelted fucking comments like this. Sexual selection ≠ natural selection. Especially in our unnatural as fuck environment. It’s rooted in natural selection, sure, but that doesn’t...
incels.is
Cucktears does not understand natural selection.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1pp3hn0/theres_no_male_or_female_loneliness_epidemic/ View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1n3n07x/darwin_never_said_the_strongest_survive_but_the/ Why do retard cuck fags feel the need to constantly try to talk shit on behalf...
incels.is
Foids don't actually value natural selection, they just use it incorrectly as a shield to prevent themselves from admitting that they are shallow and hateful people. If foids actually cared about survival of the fittest, then they would not seek medical help in case of a health complication, infection, injury etc and let "natural selection" deal with it. Everything that we do in a civilized society goes against NATURAL selection.
Now if foids like to insist that their sexual choices (in a matriarchal antinatalist world) are equivalent to natural selection (which they are not) then they should recognize females getting STDs, having abusive relationships where the man beats them, single mothers, a man that leaves them, etc also as natural selection. However it seems that most of them don't want to do it, because that would dispell the notion that female sexual selection leads to good outcomes. What is even more absurd is that they don't seem to learn from their mistakes in many cases, usually the foid falling victim to those things i mentioned, happen to do it again.
We must also not forget that the idea of feminism goes against natural selection. The lesson that can be learned from this is that women don't care about principles, they only care about what benefits them personally in the short term, but they have no problem pretending to care about principles to achieve the latter.





