Foids are more likely to start wars

[AccountError]

Throughout history, queens were more likely to wage war than kings

And they won more territory too.

qz.com

Female rulers are 27% more likely to wage WAR than male counterparts

A team of researchers from the University of Chicago studied the European rulers between 1480 and 1913. Europe's queens were 27 per cent more likely than its kings to wage war.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Queens have gone to war more than kings over the centuries

US experts analysed mainly European kings and queens between 1480 to 1913 - covering 193 reigns in 18 countries.

www.dailymail.co.uk

They are approximately 30% more likely to start a war than male counterparts. JFL at simps who believe foids are peaceful, especially Obama the giga- cuck.

 

[Hombre]

I didn't read the articles nor I plan to read them. But what is the precise reason for which this happens? Just asking I am not well-informed in history.

 

[Made in Heaven]

Obama is a reptile worshipper.

 

[CopingJim]

foids should have no say in political matters whatsoever

 

[NoCopeNoHope]

I didn't read the articles nor I plan to read them. But what is the precise reason for which this happens? Just asking I am not well-informed in history.

They aren't expected to fight in them, so they start them. Women instigate, men die.

 

[Hombre]

They aren't expected to fight in them, so they start them. Women instigate, men die.

Oh, ok. Thank you. It sounds rights, at least in my opinion.

 

[InMyCellInHell]

But men are the problem teehee...

 

[Blackpill Rage]

Foids start wars. Men fight them. Let's make these cunts fight for once.

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

Interesting

 

[Deleted member 25274]

example: The trojan war