Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy Femoids can be anything; and yet always have access to Chads, while men have to fit specific parameters

ReptileCell

ReptileCell

Recruit
★★
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Posts
164
Femoids can literally be anything, have any type of personality, be shy, be nerdy, be slutty, be traditional, be liberal, have any types of sexual kinks, they can have a high sexual drive, they can have a low sexual drive, be of any ethnicity, etc. They can be depressed, they can have low confidence, they can have high confidence, they can approach the men they like, they can be approached by the men they like, they can want to be degraded and feel bad about themselves, inflicting pain onto themselves, they can be dominant and enjoy putting others down, they can be into practically any subculture genre, they can have any interests, they can live practically anywhere in the world. They can be rich, they can be poor. AND YET ALWAYS HAVE ACCESS TO HOARDS OF CHADS WAITING FOR THEM.

AND GUESS WHAT, as for MEN, we have to be confident, have a specific dominant personality, be good looking, we have to approach women ourselves and face crushing rejection after rejection, we have to fit these SPECIFIC GUIDELINES and yet women can do / be / like literally ANYTHING and still have more than enough access to fullfill every one of their sexual desires.

Women can DO ANYTHING and Men are confined to these tiny boxes of permittable behavior, and if we step out, then we loose access to any potential source of reproductive pleasures.
 
Even the ugliest and fattest of the foids have a plethora of partners they can choose from. 2/10 fat cunt will have dozens of matches on Tinder, while her looksmatch is lying in bad alone, crying himself to sleep.
 
LIFE ON EZ MODE SON.
 
Welcome to mammals.
 
you also have to realize women outnumber men at least 1 to 10 if not 1 to 30. you have your cat ladies, either failed landwhales, or women (like my atrocious sister) killing off the gene pool by treating their pets as children and refusing to have kids, you have your dykes, etc. we could lose a lot of that slack. and the hypocrisy you state is just adding to the shit pile.
 
Femoids can literally be anything, have any type of personality, be shy, be nerdy, be slutty, be traditional, be liberal, have any types of sexual kinks, they can have a high sexual drive, they can have a low sexual drive, be of any ethnicity, etc. They can be depressed, they can have low confidence, they can have high confidence, they can approach the men they like, they can be approached by the men they like, they can want to be degraded and feel bad about themselves, inflicting pain onto themselves, they can be dominant and enjoy putting others down, they can be into practically any subculture genre, they can have any interests, they can live practically anywhere in the world. They can be rich, they can be poor. AND YET ALWAYS HAVE ACCESS TO HOARDS OF CHADS WAITING FOR THEM.

AND GUESS WHAT, as for MEN, we have to be confident, have a specific dominant personality, be good looking, we have to approach women ourselves and face crushing rejection after rejection, we have to fit these SPECIFIC GUIDELINES and yet women can do / be / like literally ANYTHING and still have more than enough access to fullfill every one of their sexual desires.

Women can DO ANYTHING and Men are confined to these tiny boxes of permittable behavior, and if we step out, then we loose access to any potential source of reproductive pleasures.

If I may add a counter-perspective:
yes they may get chads for a night, however they can't get them to commit.
You're looking at things from a male perspective,
ugly girls can't get the pretty guys they lust after to commit, just like ugly men can't get sex from the beckies they lust after
 
If I may add a counter-perspective:
yes they may get chads for a night, however they can't get them to commit.
You're looking at things from a male perspective,
ugly girls can't get the pretty guys they lust after to commit, just like ugly men can't get sex from the beckies they lust after
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG

WRONGWRON ONGOENGOPASBNHG¸O;ASHG¸L;
ADHG¸L;
ASHJGFAL;DGHJA
L`;SGJA
S;L
 
you also have to realize women outnumber men at least 1 to 10 if not 1 to 30.
lol, giga wrong cope. There are more men than women.

If the statistics say otherwise globally, it's because grannies survives to their husband, which leads to a slight bias in favor of women. But in reality, in age range of people who can reproduce, men outnumber women.
 
lol, giga wrong cope. There are more men than women.

If the statistics say otherwise globally, it's because grannies survives to their husband, which leads to a slight bias in favor of women. But in reality, in age range of people who can reproduce, men outnumber women.

Exactly, this is the exact reason why I believe that the age-old adage 'there is somebody out there, for everybody' couldn't be more misleading. This is in my opinion, one of the biggest lies that we are indoctrinated to believe (along with the denial of existence of aliens).
 

Similar threads

late20scel
Replies
15
Views
349
Pesttanz
Pesttanz
Nordicel94
Replies
10
Views
287
AlexDelarge
A
M
Replies
14
Views
221
stranger
stranger
Stupid Clown
Replies
33
Views
362
reveries
reveries

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top