
Richard Coper
involuntary celibate
★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2022
- Posts
- 2,228
If you enter the term feminism on Cuck-pedia, you will be overwhelmed by the worst kind of hypocrisy.
It says that feminism stands for the rights of humans (in general) and for equality. So the average Wikipedia reader will read that and say to himself: This has nothing to do with the favor of women, it’s actually just another word for „humanism“ and it opposes outdated norms, like patriarchy.
However, if you enter the term masculinism, you will read the following: Masculinism represents the outdated view that men are superior and strives for patriarchy. It opposes feminism (humanism XD). It also portrays the men as victims who it claims are oppressed by women. The choice of words used suggests that the reader is deliberately deterred from masculinism. Whoever is reading this article should be immediately scared away off masculinism, by making it look like total brain retardness.
And then someone should tell me that a certain agenda is not being pushed from the very top. It is also entirely coincidental that one is propagated and the other is presented as absolute evil, although both have the same meaning, only they stand for different genders. Neither feminism nor masculinism is to be equated with humanism, both focus on a specific gender and not on humanity in general, however, masculinism is portrayed as what it is, namely as „masculinism“, while the true meaning of feminism gets hidden in a disgusting and mendacious way in order to fool as many clueless people as possible and win them as a supporter, but above all to fool men into becoming feminists themselves.
It says that feminism stands for the rights of humans (in general) and for equality. So the average Wikipedia reader will read that and say to himself: This has nothing to do with the favor of women, it’s actually just another word for „humanism“ and it opposes outdated norms, like patriarchy.
However, if you enter the term masculinism, you will read the following: Masculinism represents the outdated view that men are superior and strives for patriarchy. It opposes feminism (humanism XD). It also portrays the men as victims who it claims are oppressed by women. The choice of words used suggests that the reader is deliberately deterred from masculinism. Whoever is reading this article should be immediately scared away off masculinism, by making it look like total brain retardness.
And then someone should tell me that a certain agenda is not being pushed from the very top. It is also entirely coincidental that one is propagated and the other is presented as absolute evil, although both have the same meaning, only they stand for different genders. Neither feminism nor masculinism is to be equated with humanism, both focus on a specific gender and not on humanity in general, however, masculinism is portrayed as what it is, namely as „masculinism“, while the true meaning of feminism gets hidden in a disgusting and mendacious way in order to fool as many clueless people as possible and win them as a supporter, but above all to fool men into becoming feminists themselves.
Last edited: