Any ideology that is not consistent with reality is fated to eat itself.
The adherents to relativism insist on the idea that objective truth does not exist. They want us to know that it's objectively true that nothing is objectively true. See anything wrong with this statement?
Logic tells us that objectivity must exist, otherwise chaos would take over and prevent any form of consistency to be established. Consistency is found all across nature.
Feminism will eat itself because its structures are not consistent with reality. Think in terms of a building: if the building is not bound by the laws of physics, its whole structure collapses.
How is that any different from an ideology that ignores the established science behind the genders and seeks to equalize the gender that has repeatedly shown to be inferior in every significant sense?
A great evolutionary pressure pushed men to become taller, stronger, quicker, braver, and smarter. Civilization itself was created by men to comfort women and children.
Now, after only half a century of egalitarian policies, we are supposed to believe that the laws of nature will be overcome. What exactly is their basis for assuming this outcome?
Women's presence in academia has been a disaster. They are overrepresented in the Humanities fields where 80% of scientific papers garner no citations. Women's vote single-handedly expanded the size and scope of the government. Young women are selling pictures and videos of their bodies for a living.
This madness will come to an end sooner or later. Women are not as competent as men. In fact, women are inferior to men. They are the opposite of what men represent. The authorities can force young men to treat women equally, but they cannot prevent us from finding out the truth.
Inceldom is rising. The official narrative is being questioned. Fringe groups are emerging. It's just a matter of time.
