It's widely known how the liberal intersectional coalition is composed of disparate elements that are fundamentally incompatible with each other. But the best means of exploiting its contradictions so as to undermine and destroy liberalism lack analysis.
I think the reasons for this are twofold. The first is the discursive hegemony of boomers/cuckservatives and the false dialectics they promote. In particular, they are fond of drawing attention to the inherent conflict between feminism and Islam, which is a good example of dividing and conquering the wrong way. Because when they do this, they implicitly (if not explicitly) take the side of feminists and concede to their worldview -- the more powerful one between the two!
The whole strategy of exacerbating contradictions so as cause your enemies to fight each other is based in empowering the weaker faction against the stronger faction. Therefore, the right-wing should obviously be trying to increase the power of Islam so as to prevent its sublimation into liberalism, in the way of Christianity (which, after being consumed by liberalism, now qualifies as a dead religion in the West). But they are not, and much of this has to do with Zionist propaganda, which projects Jewish power/conspiratorialism onto Muslims and tells boomers that Muslims are imminently poised to impose Sharia Law on the West (so support Israel!).
Returning to my original narrative, the second reason is the ironybro/clown-world/accelerationist mentality of thinking that contradictions will cause fragmentation in and of themselves, and all we need to do is "wait for the inevitable collapse." This is simply not true. If you sit and do nothing, the only contradictions that will be causing friction are ridiculous ones, like those between TERFs and transgenders:
TERFs are biological essentialists, whereas transgenders think gender is a social construct. But TERFs are also feminists, and feminism laid the foundations of transgenderism in the first place by discarding female gender roles and essentially turning all women into female-to-male transgenders! JFL! Those who partake in this debate are decadent bourgeois scholastics who should burned alive. But such debates will only become more prominent if the apathetic mentality of awaiting a supposedly inevitable collapse continues to rise (in this way, believing in the "clown-world" is a self-fulfilling prophesy).
What the right-wing should be doing in order to effectively uproot liberalism is be proactive and spread the correct dialectics. The contradictions between economic leftism and social liberalism are the most promising of them all -- namely, the productive male working class versus privileged women and the establishment ideology of feminism!
We live in a liberal-capitalist world, and females account for a majority consumer spending in it (even though they perform less productive labor than men and consequently earn less money than men). The reason why foids are so consumerist is because they love nothing more than considerations of status. Their lust for items of status is enabled by hypergamy, which can be defined as their lust for men of status. The female lust for status translates more broadly into a support of the ruling class and the status quo.
Women are additionally more likely than men to be interested in mysticism and religion. Given all of these factors, they are clearly the reactionary gender, and since feminism empowers the reactionary tendencies of women and justifies their power, it is a reactionary ideology. Political consciousness on these matters needs to spread.
I think the reasons for this are twofold. The first is the discursive hegemony of boomers/cuckservatives and the false dialectics they promote. In particular, they are fond of drawing attention to the inherent conflict between feminism and Islam, which is a good example of dividing and conquering the wrong way. Because when they do this, they implicitly (if not explicitly) take the side of feminists and concede to their worldview -- the more powerful one between the two!
The whole strategy of exacerbating contradictions so as cause your enemies to fight each other is based in empowering the weaker faction against the stronger faction. Therefore, the right-wing should obviously be trying to increase the power of Islam so as to prevent its sublimation into liberalism, in the way of Christianity (which, after being consumed by liberalism, now qualifies as a dead religion in the West). But they are not, and much of this has to do with Zionist propaganda, which projects Jewish power/conspiratorialism onto Muslims and tells boomers that Muslims are imminently poised to impose Sharia Law on the West (so support Israel!).
Actually, Muslims in the West are prone to becoming secularized, degenerated, and basically turned into niggers to a high degree. Examining Arab unrest in France over the years is demonstrative; only the minority of unrest has had any relevance to religion, whereas the majority is about "police brutality" and other things that you might expect Blacks to bix n00d about.
Returning to my original narrative, the second reason is the ironybro/clown-world/accelerationist mentality of thinking that contradictions will cause fragmentation in and of themselves, and all we need to do is "wait for the inevitable collapse." This is simply not true. If you sit and do nothing, the only contradictions that will be causing friction are ridiculous ones, like those between TERFs and transgenders:
TERFs are biological essentialists, whereas transgenders think gender is a social construct. But TERFs are also feminists, and feminism laid the foundations of transgenderism in the first place by discarding female gender roles and essentially turning all women into female-to-male transgenders! JFL! Those who partake in this debate are decadent bourgeois scholastics who should burned alive. But such debates will only become more prominent if the apathetic mentality of awaiting a supposedly inevitable collapse continues to rise (in this way, believing in the "clown-world" is a self-fulfilling prophesy).
What the right-wing should be doing in order to effectively uproot liberalism is be proactive and spread the correct dialectics. The contradictions between economic leftism and social liberalism are the most promising of them all -- namely, the productive male working class versus privileged women and the establishment ideology of feminism!
We live in a liberal-capitalist world, and females account for a majority consumer spending in it (even though they perform less productive labor than men and consequently earn less money than men). The reason why foids are so consumerist is because they love nothing more than considerations of status. Their lust for items of status is enabled by hypergamy, which can be defined as their lust for men of status. The female lust for status translates more broadly into a support of the ruling class and the status quo.
Women are additionally more likely than men to be interested in mysticism and religion. Given all of these factors, they are clearly the reactionary gender, and since feminism empowers the reactionary tendencies of women and justifies their power, it is a reactionary ideology. Political consciousness on these matters needs to spread.
Last edited:
