Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Feminism does not contribute to the incel problem...

R

Reborn

Banned
-
Joined
May 21, 2018
Posts
265
In the past things were working like this: There were 100 men and 100 women. Let us say there are 10 stacies and 10 chads. So in the past the 10 Stacies would marry the 10 chads. Then the chads were off the market. The other women would then have to settle for average guys.

Then feminism caused the "sexual revolution". Now when there are 100 men and 100 women 90 women will rotate to fuck the 10 chads and 90 men are left with no women and no sex.

If you make yourself aware of this it becomes clear that feminism is not merely contributing to the incel issue. Feminism is identical to the incel problem. Feminism is the problem itself. The only solution is to go back to a society where fucking around is not tolerated.
 
The only solution is to go back to a society where fucking around is not tolerated.

How do you propose this be done when the genie has already escaped the bottle?
 
How do you propose this be done when the genie has already escaped the bottle?

We must start a man's rights counter movement. We must get ourselves in the position where the feminists are right now. If anyone dares to disagree with us publically then they have to be destroyed as a person. Their job and their entire existence needs to be taken away like the feminists do when you make a joke about women.
 
Why should chads fuck all those if they can fuck the stacies? They would get a burnout if the have to fuck them all.

Ik think in reality it is

The 10 chads fuck 20 of the women.

80 normies fuck the rest of the 80.

And our 10 does fuck nobody.
 
When roasties hit the wall they'll slut shame men into marrying them and taking care of their chad son. Fuck that shit escortcel til you're blue in the face.
 
Females research of pleasure is not the main problem according to me (and I know I'm expressing an heretic opinion according to most of you here).

I think the real absolutely fucking huge problem is their unrealistic standard, their inherited reflexe to always settle for the "best Chad ever" when they could also have a talk with their looksmatch and eventually discover he's someone worth of interest.
 
The biggest probem I think is that women are treated like princesses form the moment they are born.

And the fact that many horny guys will even swipe a vacuum cleaner on Tinder, so the woman has the power
 
Feminism was introduced to depopulate the earth. Its all part of the NWO.

Its over for conspiracycels.
 
The biggest probem I think is that women are treated like princesses form the moment they are born.

And the fact that many horny guys will even swipe a vacuum cleaner on Tinder, so the woman has the power
This. When I see how my 15 yo female cousin have it (spoiled by parents, have everything without even asking, always having a "meh" face despite having more than 90% of Earth population, already lead a court of beta cuck and a giga Chad specimen to hang out ...), I really feel disgusted by my ill luck.
 
The first feminism wasn't too bad. In my opinion it is a good thing that woman can have a job and cannot be abused and assaulted by men.

It has gone wrong when those goals where reached. The feminists got greedy and want to rule men by dividing us with sex
 
We must start a man's rights counter movement. We must get ourselves in the position where the feminists are right now. If anyone dares to disagree with us publically then they have to be destroyed as a person. Their job and their entire existence needs to be taken away like the feminists do when you make a joke about women.
incels are an ugly minority in society and always will be, just lol at the idea of starting an incel "movement," and where would it begin? the internet? incels have zero influence in the virtual space and even so have already been censored literally everywhere females, Chads, and normies (i.e. the majority) congregate. Even if 100 incels went on murderous rampages (an unrealistically high number) it would do absolutely nothing to change society.
 
The first feminism wasn't too bad. In my opinion it is a good thing that woman can have a job and cannot be abused and assaulted by men.

It has gone wrong when those goals where reached. The feminists got greedy and want to rule men by dividing us with sex

So maybe there is only the choice between locking women up and beating them vs. letting incels rot and burn in hell alive. In this case I prefer the former.
 
We must start a man's rights counter movement. We must get ourselves in the position where the feminists are right now.

I was recently in an online forum discussing the unfortunate results of China's one-child-one-family policy. One woman remarked that most men should be rounded up and eliminated, that society would be better off without men. I pointed out to her that this was a bigoted comment that wouldn't be tolerated if we switched the gender. She replied that anthropology had "proven" that it would be beneficial for men to be eliminated ("Expendability Theory"). When I provided links to academicians in both anthropology and biology who discredited Expendability Theory, she accused me of sexism and reported me to the moderators who not only took down my argument but banned me on the grounds that "it is indisputable that worldwide women suffer from patriarchal oppression and we reserve the right to remove any content that could be perceived as harmful towards women." It didn't matter that the bulk of the scientific community disagreed with the woman's claim about male expendability which she used as justification for gender-specific genocide.

In light of this hypocritical and even irrational ideology that has swept the West, HOW do we start a "man's rights counter movement"? Men have already been trying to do just this, but whatever small gains we appear to make are dissolved by the omnipresent and increasingly acrid misandrist cultural ideals sweeping the globe.
 
Why should chads fuck all those if they can fuck the stacies? They would get a burnout if the have to fuck them all.

Ik think in reality it is

The 10 chads fuck 20 of the women.

80 normies fuck the rest of the 80.

And our 10 does fuck nobody.

Lmao gigs cope

Sex with a hot female is probably the best thing ever, no way anybody would get burned out. There is a reason kings and warlords of old had harems with hundreds or even thousands of hot sluts
 
So maybe there is only the choice between locking women up and beating them vs. letting incels rot and burn in hell alive. In this case I prefer the former.

I don't think so. But the thing feminists did for women who got assaulted and suppress needs to be done for us, guys who suffer those suppression backwards.
Lmao gigs cope

Sex with a hot female is probably the best thing ever, no way anybody would get burned out. There is a reason kings and warlords of old had harems with hundreds or even thousands of hot sluts

But those kings only fuck the stacy ones. A non-stacy girl had no chance to get in the harem.
 

Similar threads

K
Replies
6
Views
438
Based NaziCel
Based NaziCel
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
8
Views
332
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
TingusKangas
Replies
36
Views
979
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah
Eternalifeofdoom
Replies
14
Views
307
Eternalifeofdoom
Eternalifeofdoom

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top