Our society has an "inverted" ethical hierarchy ... To the extent that one moves away from the vertices of the intellect and of the conscience one moves away from guilt. I remember with what repugnance I read the complaint of an animalist for an abused dog: '' this innocent dog... '' the animalist called it "innocent", as if instead the man was "guilty". As if innocence was a kind of condition inversely proportional to awareness. Now also the "so-called moral superiority of the woman" (promoted by femishits) is based on this way of reasoning ... Obviously, by reasoning in this way, a hierarchy is created in which at the top there are animals ... Because they have lesser degrees of consciousness compared to men.
Think about it, every creature does evil directly in proportion to its intellect and degree of consciousness (obviously also the good in a specular way, but this way of thinking takes into consideration only evil)
The man has created the atomic bomb with which he has threatened the survival of nature and himself
The woman can use her vagina as a weapon of mass destruction, but sure she can't build a nuclear weapon because of her inferior intellect.
Dogs just bark or bite, they can do evil by just attacking a human or another animal.
Here is the moral hierarchy of 'innocence'.
By giving rights to foids, we made a terrible mistake. If we keep pushing this kind of degenerate reasoning, we will give rights to dogs and cats, stones will be the supreme innocent beings for not having an intellect and consciousness.
Think about it, every creature does evil directly in proportion to its intellect and degree of consciousness (obviously also the good in a specular way, but this way of thinking takes into consideration only evil)
The man has created the atomic bomb with which he has threatened the survival of nature and himself
The woman can use her vagina as a weapon of mass destruction, but sure she can't build a nuclear weapon because of her inferior intellect.
Dogs just bark or bite, they can do evil by just attacking a human or another animal.
Here is the moral hierarchy of 'innocence'.
By giving rights to foids, we made a terrible mistake. If we keep pushing this kind of degenerate reasoning, we will give rights to dogs and cats, stones will be the supreme innocent beings for not having an intellect and consciousness.
