A little, yes. But I bet a large portion of the discrepancy between female and male violence is that female "violence" without the use of weapons is so weak it isn't even considered violence, unless it's against a child.
Women that go for violent men aren’t any better and are just enabling them.
Female celibates can exist but they're volcel.
Just become a criminal theory.
www.independent.co.uk
well said, femcels are like bigfoot noone has ever seen it
"We're out there sweaty"well said, femcels are like bigfoot noone has ever seen it
still SMV mog you to another dimension and back"We're out there sweaty"
Obviouslystill SMV mog you to another dimension and back
Oh it will indeed happen. The "if" is settled, but the "when" is still gonna take a while. It's mainly generation z that's driving the sudden growth of the manosphere and challenging so-called "feminist" propaganda, while the older generations remain blissfully ignorant of how the game has changed. Once Generation Alpha hits their early 20s, that's when shit's really gonna kick off. No amount of propaganda, bullying, shaming, new laws or attempts to "educate men" will work once a third or more of the adult male population drops out of the dating game. When the radfems see how ineffective it all is, they'll start going shE-R. The mainstream feminists will try to talk them out of it, knowing how stupid going ER is, knowing how much it'll hurt their cause, but just like their male counterparts already did, the radicals will do it anyway.
Women are poisoners be it with words or with actual poison.
At this point, the moon must be made of cheese, right?well said, femcels are like bigfoot noone has ever seen it
99% of mass murderers are sex havers.
Staggering statistics about normtards. I feel like they need to address their own inequities before coming after us for the make-believe transgressions they come up with for us.
except posting ass and vagege on social media
