Dingus_Incel said:
They won't date men over lower educational or income status.
And they blame men for it! Instead of blaming toxic femininity, #FemininitySoFragile, they brag about how their smarts intimidate men, although there are more than enough men out there who'd be fine with dating a woman who makes more money than themselves, etc. They hide behind men so they don't have to recognize their own hypergamy and their own Social Darwinian attitude.
And if they realize at all what terrible things are done to men these days, they only look at it from a gynocentric angle. Like, I've read an article in a (non-English) newspaper lately, that was entitled "The resource 'educated man' is getting sparse'" - and the article, despite recognizing how men are getting destroyed in the education sector these days, only argued about it from a female perspective, namely: if we go on with destroying and hurting men in the education sector, the "resource 'educated man'" for females is getting sparse. How MEN feel about, how men are getting destroyed - who cares! IF they consider that at all, then only in regards to women demanding "educated men" as a resource and a status symbol.
Btw, this is also why it's so ridiculous when alt-reich and tradcucks always say that women are natural "socialsits" or something. Quite the opposite! The only thing women love more than men fighting each other is men fighting each other over them. Women don't want men to get along with each other; women are perfectly fine with MEN having to live in an anarchist arena of permanent battle where they have to fight each other tooth and nail, with the survival of the fittest. The fittest minority they then want to mate with. Women are fine with 80% of men being miserable and then competing for a place in the harem of the top 20% or so of men. There is nothing "socialist" or "social" about their attitude towards men.
