Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Females are not heterosexual

Crustaciouse

Crustaciouse

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
7,776
Besides the fact that the vast majority of woman report having sexual feelings toward other femles, or had sexual experiences with other woman. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501187
We also have to understand that woman are not attracted to men, at least not in the way we have come to identify heterosexuality.
Men for example, will be attracted to the vast majority of females they see (80% of females if you want to go by the 80-20 rule)
So those men can be categorized as heterosexual, since they are attracted to the female gender as a whole. Sure they might have certain preferences, but they are still attracted to the rest.
females however are completely different in their attraction. They are only attracted to the very top percent of men ( some would say it's 20% of men, but I'd say it's closer to 10%). meanwhile they have a complete neutrality or disgust for the vast majority of men.
This cannot be considered heterosexual since they aren't attracted to men, they are attracted to chads/tyrones/Chang's (basically the top men).
Females will then only get into relationships with other bottom tier men for the purpose of betabux/religion/cultural rules, and other societal stipulations.
For once I actually agree with a crazy feminist:
If+the+goddess+is+a+lesbian+and+all+women+are+_f28ef304351342f8842b6a5d394cbac4.jpg
 
One answer: biology and mating selection. This topic was discussed million times. Why still bring it up?
If females weren't heterosexual, there would be no evolution.
 
One answer: biology and mating selection. This topic was discussed million times. Why still bring it up?
If females weren't heterosexual, there would be no evolution.
My man, they are not attracted to males, they are attracted to chads.
You cannot say they are heterosexual if they harbor no sexual interest for the remaining 90% of men.
 
Chads and ordinary men are completly different species to them
 
Chads are still males.

Females are biologically predetermined to be attracted to the best male to breed the best genes. Since the social evolution happened very quickly in comparison to the biological, our brain still operates on animal instincts, so they are physically attracted to the most good-looking, tall and strong men, i.e. Chads.
 
Interesting discussion. Throughout the course of human history faggots, and dykes did not have free reign like they do today. I have to disagree with the feminist witch. The notion that all women are faggot-dykes first is a lie. If we observe the 90's even women were disgusted by the sodomite lifestyle, and were revolted by faggots. Being called gay was an insult even a little over a decade ago.

This is just more sodomite conditioning bullshit. ( Women are naturally dykes / men are naturally faggots )

I call bullshit. Even today only a small minority are sodomite. They just have a loud, and obnoxious platform. Male attraction by females is way more than the unnatural same sex attraction. This carpet munching liberal dyke is just trying to feed a sodomite social revolution. It's a lie. Not all women are sodomite faggots.

Every country in the world had the sense to persecute the Sodomites until recently. It was even punishable by capital punishment int the USA. The fags, and dykes do not outnumber heterosexual male, and females. If they do I demand proof of that.
 
Last edited:
I've always wondered if the availability of donor sperm will lead to lesbianism being selected for.
 

Similar threads

tehgymcel420
Replies
38
Views
416
FishmanBecker
FishmanBecker
AsiaCel
Replies
31
Views
595
Antorian
Antorian

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top