"Females are four times more sensitive than males to economic status cues when...

[blickpall]

...  rating opposite sex attractiveness, indicating that higher economic status can offset lower physical attractiveness in men much more easily than in women."

Another frontpage blackpill on Reddit. Top link. That's the reason why this is [LifeFuel]. It proves the degeneracy we've always known to be true and it is spreading.

http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(17)30315-X/fulltext

https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/7my58a/females_are_four_times_more_sensitive_than_males/

 

[Deleted member 1546]

This is why your parents tell you to stay in school and get a good job. Honestly, this is one of those things everyone already knew that we didn't even really need a study on. But it does confirms one of those things we all intuitively knew anyway. Actually, this reminds me of some newspaper article I read about how college educated women refused to date uneducated working class males.

Theres a pathetic amount of women and beta males denying the studies results in the reddit thread.

 

[Crustaciouse]

I'm surprised they let such a misogynistic post on reddit front page.

 

[blickpall]

This is why your parents tell you to stay in school and get a good job. Honestly, this is one of those things everyone already knew that we didn't even really need a study on. But it does confirms one of those things we all intuitively knew anyway. Actually, this reminds me of some newspaper article I read about how college educated women refused to date uneducated working class males.

Theres a pathetic amount of women and beta males denying the studies results in the reddit thread.

It's nothing we didn't already know, but it's coming from a legitimate source and has become the top link Reddit, so I thought it warranted to exposure and promotion. This is how the truth about the reality of the broken dating/romantic environment needs to be spread.

I'm surprised they let such a misogynistic post on reddit front page.

This. It probably triggered enough betacuck betabux, who make up a huge demographic there.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

It's nothing we didn't already know, but it's coming from a legitimate source and has become the top link Reddit, so I thought it warranted to exposure and promotion. This is how the truth about the reality of the broken dating/romantic environment needs to be spread.

I 100% agree. We all know looks and money matter. But no one will ever say it or admit it because society claims that it values "whats on the inside". These studies are an important step in destroying matriarchy and degeneracy.

 

[Indari]

sui fuel

 

[A Good Friend]

homeless chad > billionaire incel

 

[Minjaze]

Damn, beat me to it.

Science is on our side, multiple studies have proven that females are shallow creatures.

 

[mylifeistrash]

None of this stupid shit matters.

Women aren't gonna even consider a guy if he doesn't have a top tier face and if he doesn't, job doesn't matter.

For income to matter, you need to have at least millions in net worth.

 

[PseudoCel]

So what happened to the whole "strong,independent woman" narrative? Because it seems strange that women care so much about their husbands money even though they're in the workforce too.

 

[rickvanderhammer]

this isn't a blackpill, it's the complete opposite, girls would choose a homeless 8/10 over a millionare 5/10.
maybe this is true for broke post prime whores who have hit the wall, but overall this entire thread and the reddit thread is one big cuck cope.

and attractiveness is the wrong word, having money in the bank isn't going make your trophy wife wet for you, a beta provider is lucky to get vanilla sex with a condom once every 6 months.

 

[blickpall]

this isn't a blackpill, it's the complete opposite, girls would choose a homeless 8/10 over a millionare 5/10.
maybe this is true for broke post prime whores who have hit the wall, but overall this entire thread and the reddit thread is one big cuck cope.

and attractiveness is the wrong word, having money in the bank isn't going make your trophy wife wet for you, a beta provider is lucky to get vanilla sex with a condom once every 6 months.

Did you read the study or nah?

Where is your counter-study for your assertions?

 

[rickvanderhammer]

Did you read the study or nah?

Where is your counter-study for your assertions?

because PHYSICAL attraction is the only kind of attraction that's going to get a girl in your bed, you think just because you drive a Lamborghini girls are all of a sudden going to be begging for some recessed pimply chinned balding limped dicked manlets cock? get real, maybe in a 3rd world country, but i can assure you a middle class white girl 20-30 with the latest apple products doesn't need handouts.

FACE FACE FACE

stop coping, drop out of college, and accept your fate. we are destined to be like this forever, for there to be winners there must be losers and its been like this since the dawn of time, don't think you're any different

 

[whogivesafucc]

None of this stupid shit matters.
Women aren't gonna even consider a guy if he doesn't have a top tier face and if he doesn't, job doesn't matter.
For income to matter, you need to have at least millions in net worth.

>top-tier face

Literally almost every normie gets laid. Doesn't even matter how often it is, the fact of the matter is EVERYBODY other than us gets laid. It's easy to cope by saying it's over for sub-8's, but when you actually realize that like 98% of people are getting laid it becomes insanely fucked. This is the real blackpill.

 

[rickvanderhammer]

>top-tier face

Literally almost every normie gets laid. Doesn't even matter how often it is, the fact of the matter is EVERYBODY other than us gets laid. It's easy to cope by saying it's over for sub-8's, but when you actually realize that like 98% of people are getting laid it becomes insanely fucked. This is the real blackpill.

I would wager that at least 50% of 18-25 y/o males in 2018 are virgins. You're predominantly white college campus doesn't represent the whole of society. You think 98% of indian/asian males are getting laid? Most people just assume it will happen eventually or embark on some tedious, futile looksmaxing venture to help them cope. Accept your fate and start rehearsing your suicide, one day when you realize the absolute magnitude of injustice in nature you will break and do it.

 

[idkwattodowithlife]

As much as women say or bolster the fact that they don't rely on men is a big lie. Women are dependent on men, this has nothing to do with me hating on them.

There's also a study, where they had some monkeys, gave it some money, and the first thing to pop up or operate, were female monkeys doing prostitution. Sex seems to be some sort of reward.

But whatever.

 

[VincentVanCope]

The COPING in that thread. Hahahahaha

 

[blickpall]

because PHYSICAL attraction is the only kind of attraction that's going to get a girl in your bed, you think just because you drive a Lamborghini girls are all of a sudden going to be begging for some recessed pimply chinned balding limped dicked manlets cock? get real, maybe in a 3rd world country, but i can assure you a middle class white girl 20-30 with the latest apple products doesn't need handouts.

FACE FACE FACE

stop coping, drop out of college, and accept your fate. we are destined to be like this forever, for there to be winners there must be losers and its been like this since the dawn of time, don't think you're any different

1. Didn't read the study.

2. Doesn't have any evidence of his own.

Promptly ignored.

 

[rickvanderhammer]

1. Didn't read the study.

2. Doesn't have any evidence of his own.

Promptly ignored.

Cant handle the truth? Cucktears infiltrator? Face is king if you like it or not buddy boyo, girls are never going to find you attractive no matter how much you make, and if they do then why the fuck are you here. sad.

 

[Captvic]

homeless chad > billionaire incel

 

[NekoStance]

I would wager that at least 50% of 18-25 y/o males in 2018 are virgins.

Hahaha coping moron detected

 

[NekoStance]

Women actually orgasm harder when getting fucked by rich men

there's a famous study about it

 

[whogivesafucc]

>top-tier face
Literally almost every normie gets laid. Doesn't even matter how often it is, the fact of the matter is EVERYBODY other than us gets laid. It's easy to cope by saying it's over for sub-8's, but when you actually realize that like 98% of people are getting laid it becomes insanely fucked. This is the real blackpill.

I would wager that at least 50% of 18-25 y/o males in 2018 are virgins. You're predominantly white college campus doesn't represent the whole of society. You think 98% of indian/asian males are getting laid? Most people just assume it will happen eventually or embark on some tedious, futile looksmaxing venture to help them cope. Accept your fate and start rehearsing your suicide, one day when you realize the absolute magnitude of injustice in nature you will break and do it.

LOL predominantly white college campus when I literally live in the ghetto. Literally every single person other than me has gotten laid, kissed, hugged, had multiple LTR's. Even Asians, although maybe not Indians.

 

[blickpall]

Cant handle the truth? Cucktears infiltrator? Face is king if you like it or not buddy boyo, girls are never going to find you attractive no matter how much you make, and if they do then why the fuck are you here. sad.

Truth should be proven by more than just internet slang, aggressive wording, made up figures, and anecdotal evidence, all of which seem to be the only things you have in your arsenal.

 

[rickvanderhammer]

Hahaha coping moron detected

Actually it depends on the demographic of the area, in Auckland it's basically a melting pot of chinks, poos & everything inbetween, in addition females are extremely hypergamous here. Half the people who live in this city are shitskin immigrants who come here to study/leech welfare/reap the benefits of a 1st world country. It might be different where you live, but don't assume that it's the same all around the world. 80/20 rule is pretty much universal, every girl finds most guys repulsive, you're the coping moron my friend. i'm sure you will get a gf this year buddy, just be yourself  :O

---

Truth should be proven by more than just internet slang, aggressive wording, made up figures, and anecdotal evidence, all of which seem to be the only things you have in your arsenal.

make a tinder account of you posing in front of a mansion and a nice car, you will get 0 matches. money isn't going to override billions of years of evolution to seek out the fittest mate. just accept your fucked and get the idea of ever getting laid out of your head

---

LOL predominantly white college campus when I literally live in the ghetto. Literally every single person other than me has gotten laid, kissed, hugged, had multiple LTR's. Even Asians, although maybe not Indians.

Maybe girls in america are just turbowhores

 

[blickpall]

make a tinder account of you posing in front of a mansion and a nice car, you will get 0 matches. money isn't going to override billions of years of evolution to seek out the fittest mate. just accept your fucked and get the idea of ever getting laid out of your head

Incredible. We have reached the point where hypothetical situations are now proof of your "truth" whereas the scientific article which you failed to read is somehow null and void. Ignorance at its finest.

Would you believe that perhaps being wealthy is associated with "value" the same way that being muscular and having a healthy complexion was seen as "value" when your clearly not-too-distant Neanderthal ancestors needed to hunt for meat? Is it possible, that women actually have changed with the times and get socialized to the point where this new form of "value" is actually ... valued? I guess we'll never find out, since you'll never read the article because reading and comprehending requires one to rub more than two brain cells together but shitposting regurgitated truisms doesn't.

 

[rickvanderhammer]

Incredible. We have reached the point where hypothetical situations are now proof of your "truth" whereas the scientific article which you failed to read is somehow null and void. Ignorance at its finest.

Would you believe that perhaps being wealthy is associated with "value" the same way that being muscular and having a healthy complexion was seen as "value" when your clearly not-too-distant Neanderthal ancestors needed to hunt for meat? Is it possible, that women actually have changed with the times and get socialized to the point where this new form of "value" is actually ... valued? I guess we'll never find out, since you'll never read the article because reading and comprehending requires one to rub more than two brain cells together but shitposting regurgitated truisms doesn't.

the point i'm trying to get across is none of this stuff is going to make up for having the facial bones of a slug. and ur right i didn't read the article because the author of it has never lived in our shoes so they don't know how bad things really are, the author is probably has nothing in common with you and most likely despises people like us. maybe being rich gives you an edge if you're an average guy who's had 1-2 gf's in the past, but for some people nothing will compensate for their outward appearance. i'll do a tinder/online dating experiment tomorrow to prove my point

 

[Framecel222]

Hahaha coping moron detected

Seriously, I'd love to see his source on that claim. Anyone who thinks most guys are incels need to leave their mom's basement once in awhile so they can get a decent grasp on reality.

 

[rickvanderhammer]

Seriously, I'd love to see his source on that claim. Anyone who thinks most guys are incels need to leave their mom's basement once in awhile so they can get a decent grasp on reality.

not long ago only 1 in every 17 males reproduce, soon this will be reality again, natural selection, you're the one coping. despite what you think there are better looking people than you who aren't getting any puss. it's a situational thing anyway, you obviously didn't read my other posts. you need to face the reality that hypergamy is getting worse with no end in sight.

 

[Framecel222]

despite what you think there are better looking people than you who aren't getting any puss.

I don't know a single person IRL who mogs me and doesn't get laid, and that's even with being extremely harsh about my own appearance.

You're the one who's coping.

You NEED to believe that most guys are incel so that you don't feel like a pathetic fucking loser for being one yourself. But guess what? You ARE a pathetic fucking loser. You are bottom of the barrel trash. The sooner you accept this, the better.

 

[rickvanderhammer]

I don't know a single person IRL who mogs me and doesn't get laid, and that's even with being extremely harsh about my own appearance.

You're the one who's coping.

You NEED to believe that most guys are incel so that you don't feel like a pathetic fucking loser for being one yourself. But guess what? You ARE a pathetic fucking loser. You are bottom of the barrel trash. The sooner you accept this, the better.

So you're saying you're just shy of the attractiveness cutoff for losing your virginity? Lmao you're full of shit, you could gain 3 points in attractiveness and girls still wouldn't touch your ugly ass with a 10 foot pole. You have no arguments so you resort to meaningless insults, reminds me of a certain subreddit.....,you're in the same boat as me retard. You deserve your fate.

 

[Ryo_Hazuki]

Hahaha coping moron detected

For some countries, like Japan in particular, that statistic isn't too far off.

http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/growing-number-of-middle-aged-men-in-japan-are-still-virgins

A 2010 survey by the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research found that around a quarter of Japanese men in their 30s were still virgins - even leading to the coining of a specific term, yaramiso, to describe them.

So a quarter of middle aged Japanese men are completely virginal...when you add in guys who are incel but only had sex with prostitutes, that number would be somewhat higher. The percent of 18-25 year old virgins would definitely be higher. 50 percent? Probably not....but it wouldn't fall dramatically short of that number.

Obviously the poster you quoted doesn't live in Japan...but a scenario in the future where close to half of 18-25 year olds are KHV isn't as absurd as you think.

 

[nausea]

hopefully those kind of studies are conducted without females uttering a single word...

 

[Deleted member 1252]

homeless chad > billionaire incel

This. Whatever tiny deviation is found by this study, it’s so small that it’s practically irrelevant. In my experience, money will do nothing to get chicks interested in you. It’s all looks. 

When I was at college I knew this guy who was 6’3 and chadlite face. Chick all used to think we was a rich kid simply because of his appearance, but he was from a poor working class background, whereas I was from a wealthy middle class family. Halo effect -  if femoids find you physically attractive, then they will apply other attributes to you that they wish you had too.

 

[Framecel222]

So you're saying you're just shy of the attractiveness cutoff for losing your virginity? Lmao you're full of shit, you could gain 3 points in attractiveness and girls still wouldn't touch your ugly ass with a 10 foot pole. You have no arguments so you resort to meaningless insults, reminds me of a certain subreddit.....,you're in the same boat as me retard. You deserve your fate.

I am bottom of the barrel trash as well. All incels are.

 

[St.Tropez]

For some countries, like Japan in particular, that statistic isn't too far off.

http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/growing-number-of-middle-aged-men-in-japan-are-still-virgins

A 2010 survey by the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research found that around a quarter of Japanese men in their 30s were still virgins - even leading to the coining of a specific term, yaramiso, to describe them.

So a quarter of middle aged Japanese men are completely virginal...when you add in guys who are incel but only had sex with prostitutes, that number would be somewhat higher.  The percent of 18-25 year old virgins would definitely be higher.  50 percent?  Probably not....but it wouldn't fall dramatically short of that number.

Obviously the poster you quoted doesn't live in Japan...but a scenario in the future where close to half of 18-25 year olds are KHV isn't as absurd as you think.

Keep in mind some of those are lying as well. 
From.my own experience thinking that lowkey normies have good lives is really not true,even when they have sex it is fairly rare and sometimes they go years without sex and intimacy as well. 

Japan is probably where we are heading and I pity any non top tier fool that would have children in this world. 
Mark my words one day we will look back and say,hey remember how good 2017 was.

 

[blickpall]

the point i'm trying to get across is none of this stuff is going to make up for having the facial bones of a slug. and ur right i didn't read the article because the author of it has never lived in our shoes so they don't know how bad things really are, the author is probably has nothing in common with you and most likely despises people like us. maybe being rich gives you an edge if you're an average guy who's had 1-2 gf's in the past, but for some people nothing will compensate for their outward appearance. i'll do a tinder/online dating experiment tomorrow to prove my point

How can you make a point without any evidence? How is your one Tinder experiment going to undo an entire research study?

This is a perfect example of why it's important to READ. This is not an article in the sense that it's an opinion piece by some rich self-serving betabux. It's a fucking scientific publication. It's a research study. These people had to follow objective guidelines that remove bias and prove their findings to within a certain margin of error. What you argue about towards the end of your post is not even relevant nor does it disprove this research.

The stuff you are accusing this "author" of is exactly what you are guilty of yourself. You're just spouting off things you believe to be true with no substantiating evidence, all of which has been likely crystallized by confirmation bias. Do yourself a favor and READ the points you're trying futilely to argue against so you that you can avoid embarrassing yourself.