Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Female preference in "family"

junkoannhiliation

junkoannhiliation

Greycel
Joined
Nov 20, 2025
Posts
26
So i was just thinking about this, There has to be some kind of research on this and i havent found it yes this is purely anicdotal but i feel as though this is pretty universal within the community. I think that all families inheritinly have a preference for the fertile females in the family unit if they subconciously feel and know you wont reproduce i see this within my own "family" i say family in quotes here because your family would fucking dump you in the trenches of moagadishu for a thousand bucks they do not give a fuck about ugly men like you and me even some males of the family will behave this way females have always always always had the preference and advantage in scociol settings but anyway as i was saying yeah if you're family subconciously or worse conciously know you wont reproduce in this scociety they will have a shorter temper with you be more willing to kick you out they wiwll prefer your female family be kinder to them ect now i feel there are many reasons one is the shift from subsistence farming men are obviously much more useful in a manual labour role and this in a context of labour being cruicial for survival you will be respected and valued more now in this slop SOYsciety it really doesnt matter about your inherinint advantages them being your motor recruitment your physicallity and potential for improving physicallity if you live anywhere outside of 3rd world rural closed insular communities a fucking whore can pack a mcdonnalds order just as well as you can and actually foids because of "inclusive" hiring practises will get easier and more well paying work fake jobs like hr slop positions than men this obviously contribuites to the net decline of male smv but as i was saying this means even if you were to play the game of capatalism you are still worthless this does not apply to you if you are attractive and your family subconciously or conciously knows you will reproduce if this is the case generally you will be loved for just exsisting and living your life the key takeaway is women are prefered and adored for inherinit ontology ugly men are seen as a waste of resources because "family" subconciously know you wont reproduce and pass down the families genes you are basically in their eyes a waste of space and just a drain on limited resources this is why you have such worse treatment than your female family members they just see it as a positive to make you suffer subconciously to hasten your death and aleviate your "drain" on the families resources this is just my own theory produced from my own life experiences and what ive seen feel free to disagree if you want to
 
i definitely agree about the aspect of family being naturally preferential towards women, but this isnt a flaw it's by design inherently the monogamous system was designed for women's benefit. women are expected to be provided resources for, women are expected to be protected, women have their children cared for. it was designed with the idea chads wouldnt go nutting everywhere and the poor foids would be left to fend for themselves. it kinda worked in more patriarchal societies pre-feminism where the man would atleast have some dominance over the thing he has to take care of but as of right now the same cant be said your duties as a man but none of the power that came with them is the new law of the land.
women are the winner's of family
 
i definitely agree about the aspect of family being naturally preferential towards women, but this isnt a flaw it's by design inherently the monogamous system was designed for women's benefit. women are expected to be provided resources for, women are expected to be protected, women have their children cared for. it was designed with the idea chads wouldnt go nutting everywhere and the poor foids would be left to fend for themselves. it kinda worked in more patriarchal societies pre-feminism where the man would atleast have some dominance over the thing he has to take care of but as of right now the same cant be said your duties as a man but none of the power that came with them is the new law of the land.
women are the winner's of family
Inteligent reply
 
but this isnt a flaw it's by design inherently the monogamous system was designed for women's benefit
Not accusing you of being one, but this is a crypto-feminist take. Gynocentrism is not exclusive nor inherent to institutions like patriarchy or monogamy, and was actually stronger in matrilineal and gender-egalitarian soycieties. For reference just look at precolonial Native American and Sub-Saharan African culture
 
Not accusing you of being one, but this is a crypto-feminist take. Gynocentrism is not exclusive nor inherent to institutions like patriarchy or monogamy, and was actually stronger in matrilineal and gender-egalitarian soycieties. For reference just look at precolonial Native American and Sub-Saharan African culture
ill check them out, seems interesting
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top