They say that fascism is alienating.
They also say that its very important to listen to people who lived under it so that it'll never again happen.
Ok. Let's listen to a former SS-man.
View: https://youtu.be/G6lN_VVaqdA?t=469
Caring about the feelings of people who indetify themselves by one important to them characteristic and making sure that as a member, your group (thus you, because of your affiliation) are is viewed well, is really an anti-social thing, right?
I tell you what, the nazis were really social, what leftist want to paint as anti-social was anger and collective shame that demanded retribution of their character. Hitler have them the hope and the feeling that they, despite a huge loss, were a people who unproportionally to their greatness were treated like some insignificant culture. It was disrespect they essentially wanted to revolt against because they saw their L that way (prideful pricks behaved like modern neo-nazis accuse blacks to behave, mentioning the past and what not - which is me saying that most black people today are fascist too and tommorows communism is ethnic fascism).
Becouse if people will be angry when they rule, they can claim it as anti-social and therefore a trait of fascism. If a movement has fascists traits, brutal crackdowns are justifiable. No prison abolishment, no rehabilitation. That's for the others. You belonged to the priviledged group, you chose, the minorities were squished by the weight of social injustice.
Power levels beetwen europe and africa demand a dewgrowth to make the population equal (one region can't have more capital then other, steer the world, what sort of collective ownership is that? And lets not forget about the migrants, some of them at least, going back to their continet to feel the black spirit and get away from the harmful white aura) Sprinkled by caring about the ecology. Most communists care less for the abused people in capitalism or the enviroment, they are angry that the world is not the image they want it to be. Its egosim. Its illiberal and authoritarian. A socialist cares, but not a communist,
I know linked together words like these mean the same to most of you, but I make this distiction on purpose.
And the anger of the indyvidual raped and hurt by the policies of the communist will be drowned and silenced in the narration that the party and movement cares about society, that's its noble and good. We don't you to be an evil person, so we'll force you to do "good".
And the high political class will have their epstein islands, pondering the most important question: What Marx would've wanted?
Only challanged by the question every fucking christian, so much loving and pure, always had in mind: What would've Jesus said?
They also say that its very important to listen to people who lived under it so that it'll never again happen.
Ok. Let's listen to a former SS-man.
View: https://youtu.be/G6lN_VVaqdA?t=469
Caring about the feelings of people who indetify themselves by one important to them characteristic and making sure that as a member, your group (thus you, because of your affiliation) are is viewed well, is really an anti-social thing, right?
I tell you what, the nazis were really social, what leftist want to paint as anti-social was anger and collective shame that demanded retribution of their character. Hitler have them the hope and the feeling that they, despite a huge loss, were a people who unproportionally to their greatness were treated like some insignificant culture. It was disrespect they essentially wanted to revolt against because they saw their L that way (prideful pricks behaved like modern neo-nazis accuse blacks to behave, mentioning the past and what not - which is me saying that most black people today are fascist too and tommorows communism is ethnic fascism).
Becouse if people will be angry when they rule, they can claim it as anti-social and therefore a trait of fascism. If a movement has fascists traits, brutal crackdowns are justifiable. No prison abolishment, no rehabilitation. That's for the others. You belonged to the priviledged group, you chose, the minorities were squished by the weight of social injustice.
Power levels beetwen europe and africa demand a dewgrowth to make the population equal (one region can't have more capital then other, steer the world, what sort of collective ownership is that? And lets not forget about the migrants, some of them at least, going back to their continet to feel the black spirit and get away from the harmful white aura) Sprinkled by caring about the ecology. Most communists care less for the abused people in capitalism or the enviroment, they are angry that the world is not the image they want it to be. Its egosim. Its illiberal and authoritarian. A socialist cares, but not a communist,
I know linked together words like these mean the same to most of you, but I make this distiction on purpose.
And the anger of the indyvidual raped and hurt by the policies of the communist will be drowned and silenced in the narration that the party and movement cares about society, that's its noble and good. We don't you to be an evil person, so we'll force you to do "good".
And the high political class will have their epstein islands, pondering the most important question: What Marx would've wanted?
Only challanged by the question every fucking christian, so much loving and pure, always had in mind: What would've Jesus said?
