Always. ALWAYS.
It is so fucking exhausting at this point man
. It makes sense, of course. When racism, sexism and other such shit is mentioned, their NPC programming kicks into effect and they immediately start agreeing that those are terrible and unfair handicaps for the people suffering their negative effects... but when this topic is brought up, their NPC programming also activates, and they just automatically start reciting the exact opposite of what they would've
ever said in regards to racism and so on, while not even realizing how hypocritical they are because they don't think for themselves.
I mean, for god's sake, half a year ago we had an infiltrator here who couldn't even properly reply to me asking him if he'd ever tell ugly women that their looks aren't a problem and don't matter, mofo literally couldn't reply to a basic "what if the groups were reversed" comment without sidestepping its actual point
.
most of you incels here are lazy complacent cucks who act hard online but have a chronic pornography addiction and act like it is “based”. you talk constantly about your hatred for women yet if a woman was to ever talk to you irl you would stutter like an idiot with tourettes and blurt out...
incels.is
ah yeah the entitlement thing.
classic dodge they do all the time
they say it so smugly too - "you are not entitled to anything"
Are you entitled to your opinion then?
Are women entitled to protection?
Also, it falls exactly under what I mentioned - he reduces it to a personal issue.
As if incels problem is their personal preferences being too high or something.
You should have asked him if he would say that to a black person experiencing racism. Like go on, tell people upset about George Floyd that he was not entitled to breathing JFL
Were the slaves not entitled to freedom?
Were the Jews not entitled to live during the Holocaust?
He will have to draw a line somewhere with the "entitlement" concept.
He will draw it at rape, racism, etc.
But where he draws it will be completely arbitrary and actually highlight his biases even more.
If he draws it at basic human rights for example, then why does he care about other peoples entitlement?
Thoughts of entitlement are far more forgivable than human rights violations, so why care about a bunch of dudes talking online?
His own actions demonstrate his hypocrisy at that point.
Since he can not even claim that he is entitled to do what he wants, his position is ultimately retarded and self refuting.
The "entitlement" rhetoric is one of the worst dodges that comes up all the time.
But all that is besides the point. What Incels want or don't want does not matter. We do not care about personal preferences. We care about objective evidence for systemic biases present in the majority of humans. These people never ever address any of that. It would require looking at the data and refuting it.
Of course this data also overlaps with findings about systemic racism and gender stereotypes that the left and feminists rely on, so they can not really critique it without cutting off their own legs.
I have of yet, in over half a decade or longer, never seen anyone debunking any of our claims. Not even attempt to. Many of them are not even related to dating or relationships, I mention this all the time. How the fuck would you even debunk something like "women are 80% of customers?"
Even the very act of them constantly reducing the blackpill to an issue affecting women negatively
literally shows they are operating from a gynocratic mindset jfl. Like, they are so deep in the gynocratic worldview, they can not help but prove us right, because they always make everything about women, when most of our claims include
both genders of any race.
Nobody is exempt from the blackpill as everyone has a body and is therefore subject to lookism.
If you are good looking and you get treated better - that is lookism.
If you are female and people treat you better or worse for it - lookism (how else do people determine your gender? by asking for your DNA test results?)
So we can see, lookism encompasses every human being on earth.
Yet they always reduce it to "women most affected."
Thus proving gynocracy.
This is the craziest part btw. It's not only that they deny lookism but acknowledge things like racism, no worse, worse and worse - they deny lookism while affirming
lookism when the context fits them.
Women being discriminated against? = call it "pretty privilege" and nobody complains.
Trans people being discriminated against because they look like some shit from slavic fairy tale? = transphobia
How can trans people talk about "passing" as a female (lookism) but when incels bring up lookism they dismiss it.
It shows you their bias is not against the blackpill. It is against the messenger. They hate incels on a visceral level.
The messenger is the message to normies.
Another confirmation of what we have been saying for ages.
It is not what you say, it is
who you are (or rather what you look like) that matters to people.
These idiots confirm our points with every "argument" they make without realizing it. It is astonishing.
