
DarkStar
ᛟCannibalMentalcelϟϟ
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2022
- Posts
- 9,447
Facial morphology predicts male fitness and rank but not survival in Second World War Finnish soldiers - PMC
We investigated fitness, military rank and survival of facial phenotypes in large-scale warfare using 795 Finnish soldiers who fought in the Winter War (1939–1940). We measured facial width-to-height ratio—a trait known to predict aggressive ...

This study analyzed roughly around 800 Finnish soldiers from the Winter War; analyzing wether fwhr had any impact upon survivability, lifetime reproductive success, and also social status.
This part kinda confused me a bit, since you would expect the opposite, as this would make sense in concordance with evolutionary psychology. After all, fwhr does seemingly correlate with testosterone levels.Initial analysis showed a weak effect of fWHR on survival
Zilioli et al. (2014) suggested that men with larger fWHRs might also experience greater fighting success because larger craniofacial structures may provide resistance to blunt force trauma.
Facial width‐to‐height ratio predicts fighting success: A direct replication and extension of Zilioli et al. (2014) - PMC
Zilioli et al. (2014) were the first to show an association between male facial width‐to‐height ratio (fWHR) and physical aggression and fighting ability in professional mixed‐martial‐arts fighters. Here, we re‐examined this relationship by ...

And in fact, this is confirmed:
Lifefuel for some of us, but over for Ogrecels.Previous research has shown that fWHR predicts mortality with wider-faced males less likely to die violent deaths, but only when close physical contact is involved, and not when technology is used
Ah ofc, so even though survivability seemingly didn't matter as much, it was perhaps an indicator that those whom returned seemingly had better genes to begin with?Soldiers with wider faces had more children after controlling for wartime survival,
As others on here have pointed out, bad genes seemingly come in packages, which ofc makes sense- hence why many of us are both ugly & non-NT, short with below-average penis lengths, etc.
Here's the real takeaway from things though, a literal academic article more or less proves the premise of the blackpill -genetics determines life- and more or less states that face is king & can predict a lot in your life, ranging from social success to sexual success and even if you can fight good or not.Facial morphology provides a particularly useful proxy measure for male behaviour, and the wealth of historical photographs and data available allow hypotheses essential to the study of human evolution to be tested. Research has demonstrated that male facial morphology can predict social dominance [6], sexual attractiveness [7,8], reproductive success [9,10], testosterone levels [11] as well as strength and fighting ability
Yet somehow, we still have normies, bluepillers, foids, whoever gaslighting us with the "
In fact, the research literally proves the opposite, with this indicating that aggression is a better predictor of sexual success.that LRS increases with facial width is in agreement with evidence that aggression is a sexually selected trait [28].
Once again, science confirms our findings. By more thinner-faced, they ofc are referencing the more "prettyboy" types.An overall picture emerges where positions of trust and power are held by thinner-faced, probably less aggressive, yet possibly more trustworthy individuals. Wider-faced, more aggressive individuals have higher LRS, and the almost equal probability of mortality during the war meant that war did not change this relationship between LRS and fWHR
Whereas those who fit the "bully" more aggressive criteria, seemingly were more inclined to have better reproductive success when they return.
So much for all the "
I'm sure all of us here are familiar with the "difference between a chad & incel is a few mm of bone" meme, and I honestly think this meme is one of those memes that is more or less 100% accurate and not some hyperbolic statement or some form of pure brainrot shitposting. I mean as they stated, fwhr can serve as a good predictor of social, sexual, and even combat success, with these threads by @WorthlessSlavicShit showing similar findings:

"Fathers’ Facial Dominance Predicts First-Born Sons in Parent Dyads"
Brutal:shock:. Guess it's time to hit those pipes boyos, because as an incel, even when you beat all the odds and somehow manage to ascend and find yourself as an expecting father (something so incomprehensible to me I felt weird just typing it out), nature will just pull you aside and gently...


"Indeed, attractive-disadvantageous partners were preferred to the same extent (or more) as unattractive-advantageous partners"
Man, this stuff is unreal sometimes:feelsUnreal:. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjop.12495 https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/bjop.12495 For a quick overview, this study sought to look at how looks affect decision-making in relative long-term. A lot of such lookism...

In the second thread, the differences were literally just that, a few millimeters of bone.
@based_meme @BlackCel_from_ZA @AnApparentMyth @Justanotherbloke @LeFrenchCel @GeckoBus @veryrare @KillNiggers @Castaway @Uggo Mongo @proudweeb @Logic55 @Stupid Clown @AtrociousCitizen @Skelly @caineturbat2003 @Diddy @wereq @Koomersarj @KING VON @SupremeAutist @Epedaphic @NeverGetUp @Sewer Sloth @Grodd @Lazyandtalentless @Flagellum_Dei @daydreamER