face still > height
5'9 jeremy meeks gets more puzz than 6'7 mtn
5'9 jeremy meeks gets more puzz than 6'7 mtn
>What women say
Sorry, fake, false and doesn't matter.
Both would readily get pumped by Tom Cruise / Justin Biber / whoever had he appeared in their circle.
Height matters exponentially, same as face. I'd say on average height is more important for approaching in real life, face is a lot more important for social media and slightly for warm approaching.
Like if you're top 1% short man compare that to top 1% facilally ugly men.
Last edited:
id imagine you can still somewhat live in the bottom 1% of height, bottom 1% face is seppuku territory
Jeremy Meeks is 183cm (6'0) and he also went viral on social media, where face >> height. In real life for most people height/face importance is different
over
S
There are 4 metrics for attractiveness. Facial structure, lean body mass, body fat %, status. You're not comparing face to height with that comparison. You're saying face maxed, slim maxed, status maxxed (to a certain type of woman), that has compensated for his lack of natural lean body mass with muscle building is more attractive than Mikey from Recess.
dnw
What
S
Oh, a retard. How do I make it easy for you. Your claim Meeks>Theoretical 6'7
Does the table help you understand or can you not read tables
| Attribute | Meeks | imaginary 6'7" guy | Comment |
| Face | 10/10 | 5/10 | |
| Size | 7/10 | 10/10 | Even if Meeks is 5'9" he's above average in size because of muscle |
| Body fat | 10/10 | 5/10 | |
| Status | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Bottom 1% face is still salvagable, especially if you do unconventional hair long/bright/else, tatoos, lens, piercing, sunglasses and other trinkets. Would be hard to fit with normies, but you can definetely be seen as attractive to a lot of them. And with moneymaxxing I'd say a lot of walks in which face doesn't matter, on par with height in that department.
Bottom 0.0001% is completely different game though, both face and height.
Idk bout that. But as long as you average height with Chad face your good. Too bad we don’t have any of that
S
You take what they say at face value, you assume they are aware of what they like, you assume they understand all the parameters and their relative importance. Asking is useless- studying observed behaviour is important
S
Keep in mind too when watching this video women are retarded and they think 5'9.5 is 6'
Still brutal if you're under average height
Still brutal if you're under average height
At average height, face > all. But a 5'5 Meeks would be spreading cheeks in jail.
Harvey Weinstein is arguably a bottom 1% face, he did good for himself. He wouldn't have had power as a dwarf. Nobody has a position of power as a dwarf, except a fantasy character.
After 5'10 Face matters more
Having a top-tier face and an average height is better than having a top-tier height and an average face.
Putin, Jack Ma
Bottom 1% height is like 5'0'-5'1 worldwide, 5'4-5'5 in the Netherlands.
Young Harvey Weinstein
not that ugly
So much for personaliteehee. The thing that makes a guy undatable, according to foids, is stuff we can't change.
Height>Face>Race.
Height>Face>Race.
6'0 and 9/10 face is more rare than 6'7 and 5/10 face. he would never get the attention if he was 5'8
It's not about being rare, rarity is not what is attractive. If being 6'7 was more rare than a 9/10 face then still the face would be more attractive. Being deformed is also rare, does that mean it is attractive? Absolutely not
I want to make myself a barbed-wire baseball bat, walking dead style, and then use it as a tool to teach these cunts some manners - primarily by raping and beating them to death with it.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhJJP7fn5_Y
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhJJP7fn5_Y
nice fedposting GrAY
height 195+ > face minimum htn > height 185+ > ltn
Dont care.
I have neither face nor height
I have neither face nor height
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
