Deleted member 1410
Nazbol Blackpilled Amoralist
-
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2017
- Posts
- 4,378
why are women more likely to invoke ad hominems earlier in debates than men? is there a name for this phenomenon? it surely isn't Godwin's law.
Godwin's law.
Because they're still mentally children
Because they're still mentally children
Men think politically. This requires formulating arguments. It requires challenging ideas and confronting others. Men are more prepared to back up what they say with facts. Now try arguing a position without any of these characteristics. Try arguing for it when an army of orbiters are at your beck and call, from a simple signal they will rush to defend your "victimhood". All you need to do is say the magic words.
BUT, INCELS ARE LITERALLY HITLER, TEEE-FUCKING-HEEEEE
But seriously, I think we all know the answer.
This is why if you find yourself in an argument with foids, I endorse the strategy of employing the most childish and crass insults you can muster and nothing else. Foids can't even understand abstract concepts, so she isn't even considering your carefully crafted arguments before dismissing them. They're just meaningless noise that she waits for to end before her primitive brain can squawk out an insult to make you feel bad. The foid's entire reality is based on feelings (hint: this is why status is so important to them, high status = feel good, low status = feel bad). This is why they like bullying, one party feels good while the other party feels bad. They understand it! Your insults don't even have to be good or original. They just have to be mean and simple so no matter how retarded she is, she will understand them.