Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious [Experiment] [Discussion] Who has more SMV in 2020?

  • Thread starter Itsover4maymaycels
  • Start date

Title?


  • Total voters
    33
Itsover4maymaycels

Itsover4maymaycels

9'6 ZettaChad personalitycel
★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
682
A 4'10, 500 pounds, wheelchair ridden, 50 years old, deformed with a recessed jaw, has acne, badly balding, 70 IQ, jobless, racist, helicopter parent, bipolar with severe anger issues, abusive, man hating female who is also a single mother with 5 kids and lives in a decaying shitty house littered with her obssessive-compulsive disorder collection of random worthless trinkets and wants to abort any future kids. (Although she does seek out dates and a husband)

Or

A 5.5/10, 5'10 white man with middle class income, say 60k a year, he's neurotypical but not exceptionally charismatic, has average interests and average views, average at anything not specified.
 
Last edited:
who is also a single mother with 5 kid
By saying that she has kids implies she have had sex before; ergo, she has bigger sexual market value than the ugly male because we all know he is virgin.
 
Didn't even need to read the thread
You're free to hit up a tinder experiment if you don't believe the results
 
Any foid will have higher SMV that the average male. Even the worst of the worst. Hole = infinite SMV. No exceptions.

@Nameless_Sunflower you overdosing on bluepills bro? :bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:
 
white or black (you choose, doesn't matter much)
BMAXokE

Most men do not earn that much money anymore.
They work in low level physical jobs with no chance of climbing up the ladder
 
The difference in SMV between blacks and whites in the USA is too small to change anything given same stats, race only changes your SMV significantly in 2 situations:
- If you're curry or rice
- If you're in a 3rd world country
 
The fact this is a serious experiment is so fucked up.
 
The difference in SMV between blacks and whites in the USA is too small to change anything given same stats, race only changes your SMV significantly in 2 situations:
- If you're curry or rice
- If you're in a 3rd world country
What? Explain your reasoning please.
 
What? Explain your reasoning please.
What makes you think Tyrone and tyronelite will struggle any significant amount compared to Chad and chadlite in the USA? The media has already pushed BBC narrative alot which boosts them given how easily influenced foids are, and it's not like blacks are ugly on average, they mog most non-white races.
 
The difference in SMV between blacks and whites in the USA is too small to change anything given same stats, race only changes your SMV significantly in 2 situations:
- If you're curry or rice
- If you're in a 3rd world country
Nope. Whites SMV mog blacks into oblivion. Although I do agree that curry & rice have it worse though.

Also the media argument for blacks is bullshit. Media could push short autistic men 24/7 but that still wont make them slayers. Attraction comes down to BIOLOGY & GENETICS. Nothing else except maybe money and not being autistic. anything else is cope.
 
What makes you think Tyrone and tyronelite will struggle any significant amount compared to Chad and chadlite in the USA?
Didn't say they do, why would tyrone struggle.
The media has already pushed BBC narrative alot which boosts them
What?
and it's not like blacks are ugly on average
What?


 
What?

What?


BBC copers wont touch this JFL. It shatters muh "media promotion" narative into oblivion
 
There isnt a female on this planet with a lower smv than the average male
 
Didn't say they do, why would tyrone struggle.

What?

What?


Damn, i knew there was a bias in favor of whites and a strong one against curries and rices, but i didn't know it would also apply almost as strongly to all other ethnics too, 87% of foids with racial preferences excluding blacks, i only used the media argument because i thought the SMV difference was small enough for social engineering to close the gap, not this big, women are amazing people with no prejudices :feelskek:, just have a good personality and you'll get a gf, IT won't touch this

(PS: Edited the post)
 
kek guys we were born in wrong times. maybe in 500-1000 years vagina value will drop and women will start chasing men.


though it may also never drop because since ancient times women prostitutes sold sex so males can as well be cucks for next 10k years
 
Damn, i knew there was a bias in favor of whites and a strong one against curries and rices, but i didn't know it would also apply almost as strongly to all other ethnics too, 87% of foids with racial preferences excluding blacks, i only used the media argument because i thought the SMV difference was small enough for social engineering to close the gap, not this big, women are amazing people with no prejudices :feelskek:, just have a good personality and you'll get a gf, IT won't touch this
Many aspects of the blackpill aren't obvious at first or can be grasped by just applying common sense, that's why everyone on this forum should frequently read up on hard scientific blackpill material tbh..

(PS: Edited the post)
:feelsYall:
 
The foid described has more smv ( sexuell market value ) than chad tbh ( to be honest )
 
Post wall, used up, disabled, stupid, mental, Wheelchair-ridden,Egg Man-looking "woman"let
vs
Average looking NPC upstanding male citizen who has a future, can betabuxx to get transactional sex from looksmatch once a month or two

He will get less attention from opposite sex in cucked society but that's not what the question was about
He is higher SMV cause I don't see him having sex with her lmao

rp ruined
fuck you
can go sleep
 
The foid always has more SMV, no matter the circumstances.
 
That's not what SMV means

This is what SMV means
But who gives the attention also matters I think. No average dude will ask an old hag for sex only ugly ink wells and oldcels
The guy can get average looking foid. She won't get average looking guy.
Also you didn't mention guy's age
 
the average men have 0 SMV, a foid could never have 0, so she'd have it higher
us incels have negative SMV
But who gives the attention also matters I think. No average dude will ask an old hag for sex only ugly ink wells and oldcels
The guy can get average looking foid. She won't get average looking guy.
Also you didn't mention guy's age
where the hell can that average dude get the average foid?
I haven't seen such couples in a long time
 


Almost never happens nowadays other than betabuxxing

Or should you say: it happens but mostly through betabuxxing
Sexual market is cucked I agree and men will only be able to get what's below him in SMV and hardly ever get IOIs
It's not as cucked as you say and this here is just feelgood pill tbh
 

Similar threads

Benyboyo
Replies
8
Views
252
LornaDerek
LornaDerek

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top