The difference between a friendship and a relationship is that in the relationship, sex and romance is involved. In a friendship, BOTH people enjoy each other's company and BOTH people like each other. In a romantic relationship BOTH people are sexually attracted to each other, which in turn develops an emotional friendship like bond between two people who are sexually attracted to each other. Note that this does not apply to elderly people in relationships, as they are physically incapable of having sex.
Whats the point of this? Well, most romantic relationships between people aren't actually romantic at all. In a sick and twisted joke by nature, the human female brain was genetically programmed to evolve a strict set of visual requirements that require completion prior to the brain signaling to desire sexual feelings. Coincidentally, these visual requirements are only fulfilled when a human male possesses a combination of most or all of these genetic physical traits: tall stature, deep set eyes, strong jawline, low hairline with thick scalp hair, proportional facial features, large skeletal frame, and large penis.
This is most likely the remnant of the genetic behavioral programming of our ancient non-primate ancestors to ensure the constant physical development of our species overtime, selecting traits favoring physical fitness. However by a logical standpoint, this does not make sense, since our primate ancestors' success is attributed to the mental capabilities and intelligence of our ancestors increasing overtime. Instead of relying on physical power to survive like most other animals on Earth, our hominids relied on the brain to survive, becoming progressively smarter each generation as pro-cognitive traits were passed down since they increased survival. If the success of our species was attributed to female sexual preference, world renowned physicists, engineers, and geniuses would be considered the most sexually attractive males on Earth by females. Our ancestors success has absolutely nothing to do with female sexual preference; dumber hominids simply had no opportunity to survive and fucking died before they could rape someone. Smarter hominids simply had more opportunities to reproduce since they lived longer and knew how to work together and think of tools and strategies to survive. However by coincidence, the female desire to select for physical fitness survived, most likely since they didn't have the choice in what mate they had. If fucking a cavemen with a recessed chin allowed the cavewomen to survive by living with him, then she simply had no choice other than death. We see this is in the modern day with marriages, with women marrying men with stable wealth purely for increased financial stability. In these "relationships", sex does not occur often, if not at all. Sometimes females with stable jobs or wealth may marry or date unattractive males who make less money than them. However, this is more like an over glorified friendship than a romantic relationship, and sex does not occur often since the male is physically unattractive. The existence of unattractive males in relationships does not disprove the blackpill, it is merely a remnant of the patriarchy, low sex drive in the female, and a product of capitalism. A some-what average looking male who has sex often does not disprove the blackpill either, he simply is the best option available for a female at the time. With Tinder and the internet, females have near unlimited options and almost excursively pursue males with as many of these genetic traits as possible: tall stature, deep set eyes, strong jawline, low hairline with thick scalp hair, large penis, proportional facial features, and large skeletal frame.
When money does not matter, such as in highschool or college, you see girls flocking to males possessing as many genetic aesthetic/masculine physical traits as possible. Unattractive males without many desired genetic traits may sometimes get a relationship, but minimum sex will occur and the relationship will collapse upon availability of a genetically superior male.
However by a logical standpoint, the selection of physical genetic traits serves absolutely no purpose in the modern world. Strong jawlines, pretty eyes, and tall height serve absolutely no purpose to the evolution of our species other than aesthetic reasons.
Males have primitive flaws as well, such as inclination for conflict and violence due to behavioral genetics. We commit most the crime mostly due to genetic reasons, dooming humanity to constant war, conflict, and violence.
TLDR: Our evolution into self aware intelligent beings from animals was not complete, the primitive female desire to select for high amounts of genetic physical traits has created a generation of physically unattractive males who have no sex since females are not attracted to them.
Whats the point of this? Well, most romantic relationships between people aren't actually romantic at all. In a sick and twisted joke by nature, the human female brain was genetically programmed to evolve a strict set of visual requirements that require completion prior to the brain signaling to desire sexual feelings. Coincidentally, these visual requirements are only fulfilled when a human male possesses a combination of most or all of these genetic physical traits: tall stature, deep set eyes, strong jawline, low hairline with thick scalp hair, proportional facial features, large skeletal frame, and large penis.
This is most likely the remnant of the genetic behavioral programming of our ancient non-primate ancestors to ensure the constant physical development of our species overtime, selecting traits favoring physical fitness. However by a logical standpoint, this does not make sense, since our primate ancestors' success is attributed to the mental capabilities and intelligence of our ancestors increasing overtime. Instead of relying on physical power to survive like most other animals on Earth, our hominids relied on the brain to survive, becoming progressively smarter each generation as pro-cognitive traits were passed down since they increased survival. If the success of our species was attributed to female sexual preference, world renowned physicists, engineers, and geniuses would be considered the most sexually attractive males on Earth by females. Our ancestors success has absolutely nothing to do with female sexual preference; dumber hominids simply had no opportunity to survive and fucking died before they could rape someone. Smarter hominids simply had more opportunities to reproduce since they lived longer and knew how to work together and think of tools and strategies to survive. However by coincidence, the female desire to select for physical fitness survived, most likely since they didn't have the choice in what mate they had. If fucking a cavemen with a recessed chin allowed the cavewomen to survive by living with him, then she simply had no choice other than death. We see this is in the modern day with marriages, with women marrying men with stable wealth purely for increased financial stability. In these "relationships", sex does not occur often, if not at all. Sometimes females with stable jobs or wealth may marry or date unattractive males who make less money than them. However, this is more like an over glorified friendship than a romantic relationship, and sex does not occur often since the male is physically unattractive. The existence of unattractive males in relationships does not disprove the blackpill, it is merely a remnant of the patriarchy, low sex drive in the female, and a product of capitalism. A some-what average looking male who has sex often does not disprove the blackpill either, he simply is the best option available for a female at the time. With Tinder and the internet, females have near unlimited options and almost excursively pursue males with as many of these genetic traits as possible: tall stature, deep set eyes, strong jawline, low hairline with thick scalp hair, large penis, proportional facial features, and large skeletal frame.
When money does not matter, such as in highschool or college, you see girls flocking to males possessing as many genetic aesthetic/masculine physical traits as possible. Unattractive males without many desired genetic traits may sometimes get a relationship, but minimum sex will occur and the relationship will collapse upon availability of a genetically superior male.
However by a logical standpoint, the selection of physical genetic traits serves absolutely no purpose in the modern world. Strong jawlines, pretty eyes, and tall height serve absolutely no purpose to the evolution of our species other than aesthetic reasons.
Males have primitive flaws as well, such as inclination for conflict and violence due to behavioral genetics. We commit most the crime mostly due to genetic reasons, dooming humanity to constant war, conflict, and violence.
TLDR: Our evolution into self aware intelligent beings from animals was not complete, the primitive female desire to select for high amounts of genetic physical traits has created a generation of physically unattractive males who have no sex since females are not attracted to them.
