BlkPillPres
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
- Posts
- 19,738
The theory doesn't make much sense to me, there's so many things that exist that shouldn't exist if evolution theory is true.
Take for example the sloth and the bombardier beetle, the two best examples I know of, showing how ridiculous the theory is if you really think about it, the logic of evolution is that traits that INCREASE SURVIVABILITY are the ones that get passed on because the creatures possessing those traits are more likely to survive, so here's the question.
Sloth
1. Were sloths slower than they are today and they evolved to be faster?, if so how the fuck didn't they get killed off if they were that much slower? (clearly there were predators that could reach them in trees and were faster than they are, a sloth literally has nothing going for it, its the slowest, the weakest, it cant even fight back)
2. If sloths were faster then, wouldn't that be admitting that sloths literally EVOLVED TO BE SLOWER AND LESS AGILE? (sounds like the opposite of evolving to me)
Bombardier Beetle
The beetle has two separate chambers in its body where two different chemicals are stored after being produced, when mixed together the reaction between the two chemicals cause something like an "explosion", if those reactions took place inside the beetle it would definitely kill it, the chemicals are mixed only when ejected from two separate pathways leading out of the chamber, and they collide outside the beetle.
Here are the questions to ask yourself
1. What evolved first, the chambers or the ability to biologically manufacture the two separate chemicals?
If the chemicals came first then wouldn't the beetle die?, with no means to separate them that would have led to instant extinction for that mutation group
If the chambers came first are we seriously going to say that there was a creature that literally evolved random internal chambers that didn't increase its survivablity in any shape or form, and it just had that mutation for thousands of years until another mutation for that group made them start to produce the chemicals? (and the mutation for some reason just ended up making the chemicals be stored seperately in those conveniently place chambers)
There's so much that could go wrong in the evolutionary process of this particular creature that it doesn't make sense for it to exist, everytime I think about this insect I think - "this thing should be dead, it should not exist, the first iteration would have blown itself up".
Take for example the sloth and the bombardier beetle, the two best examples I know of, showing how ridiculous the theory is if you really think about it, the logic of evolution is that traits that INCREASE SURVIVABILITY are the ones that get passed on because the creatures possessing those traits are more likely to survive, so here's the question.
Sloth
1. Were sloths slower than they are today and they evolved to be faster?, if so how the fuck didn't they get killed off if they were that much slower? (clearly there were predators that could reach them in trees and were faster than they are, a sloth literally has nothing going for it, its the slowest, the weakest, it cant even fight back)
2. If sloths were faster then, wouldn't that be admitting that sloths literally EVOLVED TO BE SLOWER AND LESS AGILE? (sounds like the opposite of evolving to me)
Bombardier Beetle
The beetle has two separate chambers in its body where two different chemicals are stored after being produced, when mixed together the reaction between the two chemicals cause something like an "explosion", if those reactions took place inside the beetle it would definitely kill it, the chemicals are mixed only when ejected from two separate pathways leading out of the chamber, and they collide outside the beetle.
Here are the questions to ask yourself
1. What evolved first, the chambers or the ability to biologically manufacture the two separate chemicals?
If the chemicals came first then wouldn't the beetle die?, with no means to separate them that would have led to instant extinction for that mutation group
If the chambers came first are we seriously going to say that there was a creature that literally evolved random internal chambers that didn't increase its survivablity in any shape or form, and it just had that mutation for thousands of years until another mutation for that group made them start to produce the chemicals? (and the mutation for some reason just ended up making the chemicals be stored seperately in those conveniently place chambers)
There's so much that could go wrong in the evolutionary process of this particular creature that it doesn't make sense for it to exist, everytime I think about this insect I think - "this thing should be dead, it should not exist, the first iteration would have blown itself up".
Last edited: