Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Ever notice guys who get girls easily are always chill and carefree

I

ionlycopenow

Self-banned
-
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Posts
15,349
Meanwhile guys who don't are pretty much always angry, agressive or depressed

Totally normal response, and they know that. That's why there's such a heavy push to put estrogen everywhere, in order to lower t levels and keep males from being agressive as a result. They know this, it's common sense , IT is too stupid to know about common sense, but the people at the top aren't and everything they do, they do for a reason.

That is, If they're normal t. I know there's plenty of "virgin but not incels" types who can't even bench a plate.

But I've really never seen a regular sexhaver that is agressive.
 
getting girls gives you a good personality

not the other way around
 
getting girls gives you a good personality

not the other way around
There are studies which show that men who get married develop lower T levels.

So instead of putting soy and estrogen everywhere, why not just give us women? :waitwhat:
 
Last edited:
When you’re emptying your ballsack every night, of course you’ll be calm and carefree.
 
When you’re emptying your ballsack every night, of course you’ll be calm and carefree.
Yeah, because you won at life by having good genes.

Everyone else is just gonna be agressive and angry knowing they lost. That is again, if they have normal t levels. If not, theyre low t and estrogenized.
 
Yeah, because you won at life by having good genes.

Everyone else is just gonna be agressive and angry knowing they lost. That is again, if they have normal t levels. If not, theyre low t and estrogenized.
Soys and sex-havers are on opposite ends of a horse-shoe, both tranquil and carefree.

While the immiserated incels in the middle are left to deal with their emotional turmoil.

Lifefuel for soys?
 
Meanwhile guys who don't are pretty much always angry, agressive or depressed

Totally normal response, and they know that. That's why there's such a heavy push to put estrogen everywhere, in order to lower t levels and keep males from being agressive as a result. They know this, it's common sense , IT is too stupid to know about common sense, but the people at the top aren't and everything they do, they do for a reason.

That is, If they're normal t. I know there's plenty of "virgin but not incels" types who can't even bench a plate.

But I've really never seen a regular sexhaver that is agressive.
This. Fuck every peice of bullshit advice and lecture they give us. NORMIES! DON'T! KNOW! SHIT! If they had our lives they wouldn't say a damn thing.
 
Turns out when you get stuff you want you're in a better mood.
 
Soys and sex-havers are on opposite ends of a horse-shoe, both tranquil and carefree.

While the immiserated incels in the middle are left to deal with their emotional turmoil.

Lifefuel for soys?
Soys are not carefree and tranquil because they need the effort to keep an "unfazed" personality to help them delude themselves that they're not utter failures.
 
Meanwhile guys who don't are pretty much always angry, agressive or depressed

Totally normal response, and they know that. That's why there's such a heavy push to put estrogen everywhere, in order to lower t levels and keep males from being agressive as a result. They know this, it's common sense , IT is too stupid to know about common sense, but the people at the top aren't and everything they do, they do for a reason.

That is, If they're normal t. I know there's plenty of "virgin but not incels" types who can't even bench a plate.

But I've really never seen a regular sexhaver that is agressive.


The normies I know with wives or landwhale ugly GFs are STRESSED AS HELL

maybe you mean "chads"
 
There are studies which show that men who get married develop lower T levels.

So instead of putting soy and estrogen everywhere, why not just give us women? :waitwhat:
Depopulation and Control.
 
well adjusted humans are carefee and chill yes
 
IT attacked this post, claiming that "Well no duh are men who are friendly to talk with more likely to get girls"

J...F...L....

There's just NO REASON why there's a correlation between natural physical features and social fluency, and just NO REASON whatsoever WHY naturally physically attractive men can be the biggest dickwads on the planet and get any girl they want.

Oh hey, a girl ended up in an abusive relationship with a roid user. Who would have seen that coming. Apparently not women.
 
cope, neurotic chads get laid
 
Good genes with good outcomes GIVES you a better attitude.
 
When you’re emptying your ballsack every night, of course you’ll be calm and carefree.
IT attacked this post, claiming that "Well no duh are men who are friendly to talk with more likely to get girls"

J...F...L....

There's just NO REASON why there's a correlation between natural physical features and social fluency, and just NO REASON whatsoever WHY naturally physically attractive men can be the biggest dickwads on the planet and get any girl they want.

Oh hey, a girl ended up in an abusive relationship with a roid user. Who would have seen that coming. Apparently not women.
Society will never stop gaslighting ugly men until we all go ER
 
There are studies which show that men who get married develop lower T levels.

So instead of putting soy and estrogen everywhere, why not just give us women? :waitwhat:
Man, T and E are not the only hormones on this planet.

However, past studies have often revealed that men with high testosterone levels are not automatically appealing to women, who view such testosterone-laden men as having long-term drawbacks. For instance, the macho guys may lead a "player's" lifestyle, or may also be bad parents.

Instead, human behavioral ecologist Fhionna Moore at the University of Abertay Dundee in Scotland and her colleagues focused on the stress-linked hormone cortisol. Persistently high levels of cortisol can suppress not just the immune system, but also reproductive function. As such, it would make sense if women preferred men with low cortisol levels — that is, those who are not stressed out.
 
Bad experiences cause you to get into your own head
 
Man, T and E are not the only hormones on this planet.

higher cortisol levels = lower testosterone levels
lower cortisol levels = higher testosterone levels

All that's saying is women prefer giga high T Chads to impregnate them in one night stands, and lower T soys to cuckold in long term relationships, which is fully explained by Dual Mating Strategy.

Giga high T Chad slayers naturally lack cortisol, but soy hubbies have more of it, given that high conscientiousness (what makes a "good parent") is associated with increased cortisol stress responsivity in men, and psychopathy (what makes a "good lover") is inversely correlated with conscientiousness.
 
Last edited:
higher cortisol levels = lower testosterone levels
lower cortisol levels = higher testosterone levels

All that's saying is women prefer giga high T Chads to impregnate them in one night stands, and lower T soys to cuckold in long term relationships, which is fully explained by Dual Mating Strategy.

Giga high T Chad slayers naturally lack cortisol, but soy hubbies have more of it, given that high conscientiousness (what makes a "good parent") is associated with increased cortisol stress responsivity in men, and psychopathy (what makes a "good lover") is inversely correlated with conscientiousness.
That is not the full picture. They were 4 groups (LCHT,LCLT,HCLT,HCHT), which make the simple statement "highC<->lowT", and "lowC<->highT" a false one. (but yes, in highT groups you will find propbaly mean lower Cortisol than in a lowT group)

Low Cortisol high Testosterone group was rated less, also the high Cortisol low Testosterone group.

Also: In the first mentioned more simple experiment, cortisol was the significant impact on rated attractiveness, not testosterone.

First, scientists recruited 39 healthy young male students from the same university and measured their cortisol and testosterone levels from saliva samples they provided. The researchers next had 42 straight female students from a different university rate photos of these men for attractiveness, masculinity and health.

Men with low cortisol levels were often rated as more attractive than guys with high cortisol levels. Testosterone levels were not significantly linked with attractiveness, masculinity or health.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top