JFL Even Barbaric Savages in iconic paintings are still portrayed as decent looking

[Deleted member 23656]

According to this painting of the Sack of Rome, one would think that the average barbarian:

Had the ideal proportion of man
Was well toned muscular without being too excessive
Had very good skin with no major blemishes
Somehow was clean and not covered in shit
Well kept hair
Good jawline
Probably had a huge dick seeing that he was willing to run around Rome naked without feeling ashamed

I'm pretty sure the average barbarian didn't look this this

 

[Aziz]

Neither did jesus look the way he's portrayed now

 

[FUCKITALLREEE]

Neither did jesus look the way he's portrayed now

Based signature.

 

[Blackpill Rage]

Neither did jesus look the way he's portrayed now

Cope. Jesus never existed.

 

[Deleted member 4999]

Based signature.

Its based because its true

 

[Numb]

Its based because its true

 

[CopingJim]

If they were portrayed the way they really looked like no one would buy the painting or care to see it in a museum

Neither did jesus look the way he's portrayed now

Similarly, if jesus was portrayed as an ethnic manlet, less people would care about the religion and the message. People have taken advantage of the looks halo to adverise their shit for millenia.

 

[AccountError]

High IQ
Foids are retarded to think chads were a common thing back then, noone had access to hygiene, gyms and surgery. If these people were in battle they'd probably have scars, damaged limbs or a worn down body. jfl

 

[DepressionTookMyIQ]

Here's a ethnic barbarian killing chad for you

 

[InMyCellInHell]

Well liked people are always portrayed as better than they are. We'll always be represented as ghouls, perverts and ogres.

 

[Yerberito]

Neither did jesus look the way he's portrayed now