If there’s a moon, and you have the means to go there, you go there . You don’t think about it .. you’re obligated to go there. Theoretically you can decide not to go, but let’s be real, that’s not really an option..
If you could control the evolution of your species, pick it’s trajectory, and do it 1000x faster than natural/sexual selection can, if it even can, you do it..
I’m not talking about filtering out maneltism or norwoodism, I’m talking about filtering out disease, genetic disorders, selecting for longevity and IQ.. objectively positive things.. longevity and IQ for example are two hereditary traits.. if you only allowed the top 0.1% of the healthiest, smartest, longest lived men to reproduce with the healthiest females, the next generation would already be a man apart.. do this a few times over a few generations and you have legit super humans.. average lifespan of 150, 200, 250+ years, average IQ 180+.. with like 99% of genetic disease eradicated .. an entire population of Einsteins and Teslas. No telling what humanity could achieve .. you could make 1000 years of progress in 10 years.. this should be the FIRST thing humans do once they have the means of doing it , vs going about advancing the species the non-eugenics way. And once u get there, u can start fucking around and having some fun and start selecting for height and hair loss and bone mass, but tbh Foids would do that themselves when left to their own devices .. it’s happening now tbh. Manletism is slowly being weeded out as we speak.. “foid sexual selection good, artificial selection bad” “animal eugenics good, human eugenics bad”
PLUS.. these are traits you can select for that nature could not. Super important traits that are at sufficient values to survive , but not enough to prosper.. nature can’t select for longevity past like 40, and it can’t select for IQ (not anymore) and it’s not like foids are select for IQ.. the way things are going, the human lifespan will only increase as medicine improves, but only by a little, and 10,000 years from now , people will still be 100 IQ drooling bipedal chimps living in a world made possible only by the contributions of a select few High IQ members.. grim future ngl..
You could spend billions of dollars and decades of years trying to find a cure for some genetic disorder, or you could just make sure people with that disorder stop fucking, and then POOF!.. it disappears. Problem solved. Why must we do things the hard way?
The more you think about it , the more obvious It is.. but nah, people are walking dunning-Kruger effects and they reject the idea of eugenics with virtuous convictions like “muh ethics, muh god, muh persuit of happiness, muh equality”.. all it would take is a couple generations of humans to take one for the team, and sacrifice having children for the greater good.. or at the very least you could let EVERYONE reproduce, but just in their own little corner, away from your control group of super humans, so they don’t pollute the gene pool.. are there literally any downsides ??? I’m seeing an infinity return with 0 risk..
Is a 75 year lifespan really ok? Can’t we improve upon that? Is a 100 IQ really sufficient? That’s fucking chimp tier.. is it ok for people to die at 30 from random shit their shitty DNA gave them?
Think of the wonders of the modern technological world.. this could have happened thousands of years ago if humans weren’t brainlets.. and we’d be living in the year 10,000 right now, with cities on planets in other solar systems, harnessing energy from stars with Dyson spheres, traveling Between star systems at 50% light speed.. other shit we could do that we can’t even fathom of cause some hypothetical 200 IQ specimen 1000 years from now hasn’t invented it yet...
if your species has the necessary intelligence to be self-aware, and you know how genetics work, and you know that kids take after their parents , and some traits are better than others, then you know you can control that.. so you do it.. no questions asked.. legit fast tracking evolution in the trajectory of your choosing.. it’s a golden opportunity. I can’t think of a more important cause.. why is everybody against it ? When you boil it down, it’s just investing in your species tbh.
People are ok with sexual selection for height, but they’re not ok with artificial selection for disease, longevity, and IQ.. “muh the heart wants what it wants, muh love, muh that’s different tho that’s like attraction like I can’t help what I’m attracted to teehee”
Fuck humanity. What a stupid brainlet species. Hitler shouldve taken over the world tbh. He knew what’s up. Humanity’s biggest fuckup, even more of a fuckup than giving women rights and unrestricting their sexuality, is not implementing species-wide eugenics..
I DEFY ANYONE TO TELL ME EXACTLY WHY EUGENICS IS WRONG
My nigga @femalesentience put it well:
If you could control the evolution of your species, pick it’s trajectory, and do it 1000x faster than natural/sexual selection can, if it even can, you do it..
I’m not talking about filtering out maneltism or norwoodism, I’m talking about filtering out disease, genetic disorders, selecting for longevity and IQ.. objectively positive things.. longevity and IQ for example are two hereditary traits.. if you only allowed the top 0.1% of the healthiest, smartest, longest lived men to reproduce with the healthiest females, the next generation would already be a man apart.. do this a few times over a few generations and you have legit super humans.. average lifespan of 150, 200, 250+ years, average IQ 180+.. with like 99% of genetic disease eradicated .. an entire population of Einsteins and Teslas. No telling what humanity could achieve .. you could make 1000 years of progress in 10 years.. this should be the FIRST thing humans do once they have the means of doing it , vs going about advancing the species the non-eugenics way. And once u get there, u can start fucking around and having some fun and start selecting for height and hair loss and bone mass, but tbh Foids would do that themselves when left to their own devices .. it’s happening now tbh. Manletism is slowly being weeded out as we speak.. “foid sexual selection good, artificial selection bad” “animal eugenics good, human eugenics bad”
PLUS.. these are traits you can select for that nature could not. Super important traits that are at sufficient values to survive , but not enough to prosper.. nature can’t select for longevity past like 40, and it can’t select for IQ (not anymore) and it’s not like foids are select for IQ.. the way things are going, the human lifespan will only increase as medicine improves, but only by a little, and 10,000 years from now , people will still be 100 IQ drooling bipedal chimps living in a world made possible only by the contributions of a select few High IQ members.. grim future ngl..
You could spend billions of dollars and decades of years trying to find a cure for some genetic disorder, or you could just make sure people with that disorder stop fucking, and then POOF!.. it disappears. Problem solved. Why must we do things the hard way?
The more you think about it , the more obvious It is.. but nah, people are walking dunning-Kruger effects and they reject the idea of eugenics with virtuous convictions like “muh ethics, muh god, muh persuit of happiness, muh equality”.. all it would take is a couple generations of humans to take one for the team, and sacrifice having children for the greater good.. or at the very least you could let EVERYONE reproduce, but just in their own little corner, away from your control group of super humans, so they don’t pollute the gene pool.. are there literally any downsides ??? I’m seeing an infinity return with 0 risk..
Is a 75 year lifespan really ok? Can’t we improve upon that? Is a 100 IQ really sufficient? That’s fucking chimp tier.. is it ok for people to die at 30 from random shit their shitty DNA gave them?
Think of the wonders of the modern technological world.. this could have happened thousands of years ago if humans weren’t brainlets.. and we’d be living in the year 10,000 right now, with cities on planets in other solar systems, harnessing energy from stars with Dyson spheres, traveling Between star systems at 50% light speed.. other shit we could do that we can’t even fathom of cause some hypothetical 200 IQ specimen 1000 years from now hasn’t invented it yet...
if your species has the necessary intelligence to be self-aware, and you know how genetics work, and you know that kids take after their parents , and some traits are better than others, then you know you can control that.. so you do it.. no questions asked.. legit fast tracking evolution in the trajectory of your choosing.. it’s a golden opportunity. I can’t think of a more important cause.. why is everybody against it ? When you boil it down, it’s just investing in your species tbh.
People are ok with sexual selection for height, but they’re not ok with artificial selection for disease, longevity, and IQ.. “muh the heart wants what it wants, muh love, muh that’s different tho that’s like attraction like I can’t help what I’m attracted to teehee”
Fuck humanity. What a stupid brainlet species. Hitler shouldve taken over the world tbh. He knew what’s up. Humanity’s biggest fuckup, even more of a fuckup than giving women rights and unrestricting their sexuality, is not implementing species-wide eugenics..
I DEFY ANYONE TO TELL ME EXACTLY WHY EUGENICS IS WRONG
My nigga @femalesentience put it well:
Last edited:
Nature doesn't care if evolution requires hurting your feefees
