News Ethnicel faces federal child pornography charges for secretly recording foidlets in their homes

[PPEcel]

This week, the U.S. Department of Justice announced:

A California man was arrested this morning and charged with surreptitiously filming an 11-year-old Massachusetts girl changing in her bedroom in March 2021.
Jacob Guerrero, 23, of Woodland, Calif., was charged with one count of sexually exploiting a child. Guerrero was arrested this morning in California and will appear in federal court in the Eastern District of California this afternoon. He will appear in federal court in Boston at a later date.

According to an affidavit from FBI Special Agent Geoffrey Kelly, Guerrero was first arrested in Wrentham, MA for voyeurism back in September 2021. Guerrero allegedly taped miniature cameras to his shoes, wore a wig and women’s clothing, to film femoids in changing rooms. An employee of a mall in Wrentham noted that “one customer had complained that Guerrero had been waiving his foot at the dressing room while her teenaged daughter was changing.”


Guerrero dressed as a foid

When law enforcement searched Guerrero’s iPhone, they realized he had a habit of climbing onto trees, rooftops, and garages of various strangers’ homes in order to stalk and secretly record their occupants. He would write notes about the schedules of these strangers. On multiple occasions, he recorded minors while they were in the process of changing their clothes.

This is the FBI’s description of one of the videos that Guerrero produced:



Guerrero now faces a minimum of 15 years in federal prison for producing child pornography.

Zero inhib @RoastieBeef @Wizard32

 

[BraincelsRefugee]

Meanwhile Chad fratboys grape drunk women in college all the time and they get away with it. But peeping tom truecel gets 15 years.

Justice system is blind bro

 

[crestfallencel]

Guerrero allegedly taped miniature cameras to his shoes, wore a wig and women’s clothing, to film femoids in changing rooms.

we're in 2022, this nigga living in 3022

 

[erenyeager]

Mogs me facially.

 

[erenyeager]

we're in 2022, this nigga living in 3022

High iq trucel

 

[PPEcel]

Meanwhile Chad fratboys grape drunk women in college all the time and they get away with it. But peeping tom truecel gets 15 years.

Justice system is blind bro

It's because the ethnicel recorded it, which allowed for federal jurisdiction. If he hadn't recorded anyone he'd probably get hit only with (much more lenient) state charges.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Them calling a vid of someone changing "pornography" is fucking ridiculous. Porn = depicting sexual intercourse, not just depicting nudity.

Videos of naked people not doing sex aren't porn their just naturism.

Also this situation is suss as fuck, at eleven years old you know enough about privacy not to get fully nude in front of a window without drawing curtains.

If you lacked a curtain rod it's still pretty simple to use a thumbtack to hold up a towel to block view while you do this.

This girl was obviously an exhibitionist hoping someone was watching her. You don't aim your breasts at a window and get completely naked like that otherwise.

Not necessarily broadcasting for this dude in particular but probably Chad living across the street, she hopes Chad is watching.

You'll also notice the word game regarding Minor A, they phrase she lacks "developed breasts" which actually means she does have breast development but they're saying because they're not FULLY developed that it's somehow "evidence of pre-pubescence".

Bullshit like "absence of pubic hair" is inadequate evidence since she could've grown some and shaved it off.

Odds are that the distance and bending of light through window would have fucked up recording small details like that unless someone had a truly massive bush.

 

[Indari]

15 years for this, lol@virtue signaling courts

 

[Deleted member 41988]

Mogs me facially.

 

[RoastieBeef]

Meanwhile Chad fratboys grape drunk women in college all the time and they get away with it. But peeping tom truecel gets 15 years.

Justice system is blind bro

Chad frat boys at my college were caught inviting underage high schoolers to their parties. So it's worse than what you describe. They're getting high schoolers drunk and date raping them.

 

[PPEcel]

15 years for this, lol@virtue signaling courts

blame congress, not the courts

 

[BraincelsRefugee]

Chad frat boys at my college were caught inviting underage high schoolers to their parties. So it's worse than what you describe. They're getting high schoolers drunk and date raping them.

And let me guess, they used their rich parents connections and looks halo to get a slap on the wrist as punishment, right?

 

[RoastieBeef]

And let me guess, they used their rich parents connections and looks halo to get a slap on the wrist as punishment, right?

As usual.

 

[AutisticMonstrosity]

How is that "ethnicel"?

 

[JayGoptri]

Them calling a vid of someone changing "pornography" is fucking ridiculous. Porn = depicting sexual intercourse, not just depicting nudity.

Videos of naked people not doing sex aren't porn their just naturism.

Also this situation is suss as fuck, at eleven years old you know enough about privacy not to get fully nude in front of a window without drawing curtains.

If you lacked a curtain rod it's still pretty simple to use a thumbtack to hold up a towel to block view while you do this.

This girl was obviously an exhibitionist hoping someone was watching her. You don't aim your breasts at a window and get completely naked like that otherwise.

Not necessarily broadcasting for this dude in particular but probably Chad living across the street, she hopes Chad is watching.

You'll also notice the word game regarding Minor A, they phrase she lacks "developed breasts" which actually means she does have breast development but they're saying because they're not FULLY developed that it's somehow "evidence of pre-pubescence".

Bullshit like "absence of pubic hair" is inadequate evidence since she could've grown some and shaved it off.

Odds are that the distance and bending of light through window would have fucked up recording small details like that unless someone had a truly massive bush.

"Oh say can you seeeee, by the winndoww a girl's panties"...

[UWSL]Hes a peeping Tom. He should be fined for violating another's privacy, but not much more. [/UWSL]

So what are they saying he used the video for? How is it "production", I missed that part. Did he distribute the videos? How did Big Brother FBI get them?

 

[JayGoptri]

View attachment 600986

This week, the U.S. Department of Justice announced:


View attachment 600987
Guerrero dressed as a foid

But I do have to say, just like in the case of our dear dumbass Kaufman, this chap is certainly an idiot of the highest order as well...

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

So what are they saying he used the video for? How is it "production", I missed that part. Did he distribute the videos? How did Big Brother FBI get them?

Production AFAIK just means the creation/recording of an image.

It becomes especially meaningless in the digital age because it's impossible to "view" anything without your computer at least making a temporary copy in cache memory.

Copying an image AFAIK is counted as production to inflate the charges even though it's basically just viewing and the person was not involved in the original photography.

 

[PPEcel]

Production AFAIK just means the creation/recording of an image.

It becomes especially meaningless in the digital age because it's impossible to "view" anything without your computer at least making a temporary copy in cache memory.

Copying an image AFAIK is counted as production to inflate the charges even though it's basically just viewing and the person was not involved in the original photography.

you are wrong

Them calling a vid of someone changing "pornography" is fucking ridiculous. Porn = depicting sexual intercourse, not just depicting nudity.

18 USC 2256 disagrees

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

you are wrong

which law distinguishes copying from production?

18 USC 2256 disagrees

part 8a of https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256 is using the phrase "sexually explicit conduct" to represent 'pornography'

in https://www.law.cornell.edu/definit...frame=true&def_id=18-USC-821371409-1416780790 they abuse the phrase "sexual intercourse".

genital-genital intercourse is the only valid kind of sexual intercourse, the other kinds they describe (oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal) are not sexual intercourse

masturbation and "lascivious exhibition" are also not pornography in any classic sense

pornography's etymology means drawings of harlots, and harlotry refers to someone who has sexual intercourse for money

someone who just displays their genitals is not a harlot in any classic greek sense, they'd just be a nude model

 

[aGuyAlone]

View attachment 600986

This week, the U.S. Department of Justice announced:


According to an affidavit from FBI Special Agent Geoffrey Kelly, Guerrero was first arrested in Wrentham, MA for voyeurism back in September 2021. Guerrero allegedly taped miniature cameras to his shoes, wore a wig and women’s clothing, to film femoids in changing rooms. An employee of a mall in Wrentham noted that “one customer had complained that Guerrero had been waiving his foot at the dressing room while her teenaged daughter was changing.”

View attachment 600987
Guerrero dressed as a foid

When law enforcement searched Guerrero’s iPhone, they realized he had a habit of climbing onto trees, rooftops, and garages of various strangers’ homes in order to stalk and secretly record their occupants. He would write notes about the schedules of these strangers. On multiple occasions, he recorded minors while they were in the process of changing their clothes.

This is the FBI’s description of one of the videos that Guerrero produced:

View attachment 600988

Guerrero now faces a minimum of 15 years in federal prison for producing child pornography.

Zero inhib @RoastieBeef @Wizard32

The changing room thing was retarded as fuck Realistically he wouldn't even have got caught if he hadn't done that and now he got 15 years in jail when he never even raped a foid

 

[PPEcel]

The changing room thing was retarded as fuck Realistically he wouldn't even have got caught if he hadn't done that and now he got 15 years in jail when he never even raped a foid

15 year minimum, 30 year max

Still didn't get to touch a foid

 

[Rimiru]

View attachment 600987

Autistcel too it seems

 

[Deleted member 5712]

at eleven years old you know enough about privacy not to get fully nude in front of a window without drawing curtains.

This girl was obviously an exhibitionist hoping someone was watching her.

I also think the sentence is bullshit because I can literally be in the same changing room as a girl and it's all fine. Happens at dance recitals or sports games all the time where a girl (usually younger) will change in front of everyone really quickly and nobody gives a shit. Nobody is going to FUCKING PRISON for being in view of her. ergo it's literally not child pornography unless it is filmed WHICH MAKES EVEN LESS LOGICAL SENSE!!!! ARGHHHHHHH

(and don't get me started on eleven year olds being exhibitionists. can't go into extreme details but used to walk to work and would see this girl. same time. few days a month. she would do laundry. looked probably 10. she would go outside to the balcony and get into her underwear. undressing an article of clothing piece by piece. one by one. then putting it in the washer. at the very last she would walk out of her pants ahegao and then step over to pick up her socks feelsohh and throw them in the washer then quickly run back inside the house. god dammit if she wasn't a little fuckin vixen knowing that all the boys were staring at her on her balcony. fucking whore knew 110% what she was showing. the panties were so tight you could......AHEM...

as i said i can't go into extreme details.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

15 year minimum, 30 year max
Still didn't get to touch a foid

15 years for photographing some 10yo, he should've just waited 10 years and raped her when she was 20 and only gotten 5 years, he'd be out at the same time

 

[PPEcel]

15 years for photographing some 10yo, he should've just waited 10 years and raped her when she was 20 and only gotten 5 years, he'd be out at the same time

no shit

 

[Pixycel]

and don't get me started on eleven year olds being exhibitionists. can't go into extreme details but used to walk to work and would see this girl. same time. few days a month. she would do laundry. looked probably 10. she would go outside to the balcony and get into her underwear. undressing an article of clothing piece by piece. one by one. then putting it in the washer. at the very last she would walk out of her pants ahegao and then step over to pick up her socks feelsohh and throw them in the washer then quickly run back inside the house. god dammit if she wasn't a little fuckin vixen knowing that all the boys were staring at her on her balcony. fucking whore knew 110% what she was showing. the panties were so tight you could......AHEM...

.is moment