The only reason why Germany was so successful in both world wars is that 95% of Germany were Germans.Look at how shitty Austria-Hungary fought in the First World War and that's what diversity looks like.
We can also look at LATAM, and the current West too, to see how diversity doesn't work
Yes, but if suddenly there is a war, all the flaws will come out. If you have a diverse population, then you don't have the sense of trust, brotherhood and cohesion that play a crucial role in morale in war.
They lost both wars and now they're being demographically replaced by muslims.
Indeed
Fighting against the whole world and losing with shitty allies is not so shameful. The Germans won on the eastern front of the First World War, and in the Second World War it was a war against the United States, the British Empire and the USSR of the three giants.
Yeah, but at what cost? If hitler never rose to power then It would have saved millions of lives on both sides. If plus there wouldn't be an excuse to push multiculturalism.
Yes, but it was logical. Those who do not take risks always lose. He could well have made Europe free from communism and Judaism if he had not been so arrogant German nationalists and treated defeated nations relatively normally.
No Zionism, no Judaism, no communism, no feminism, no LGBT, no degeneracy, only the encouragement of strong military masculinity.
And if that military masculinity is not going to land you a foid then it's a waste of time.
Yes, but Anyway Europe would not be in danger of death due to a low birth rate.
ethnic diversity don't exist because they all look the same. black hair, black beard, all have the same cut, where is diversity? Euros had already the biggest diversity they had all eye colors, all skins, euros already were perfect. my sister have green eyes, me having blue ones, there is everything in one family. more diversity that euros already have is not possible.
Yes, but, Austria-Hungary was very diverse (Germans, Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Croats, Slovenes, Poles, Ukrainians, Italians, Romanians) And they were very badly beaten in the First World War by the Russian Empire, which was more backward, only due to the fact that the Habsburg Empire was too multinational.
nope. russians were always strong, its not for nothing that this country goes from europe to the borders of korea! they are multinational too.
Russia has always been technologically backward and corrupt, the only thing that Russia had was huge masses of soldiers and superiority in numbers.
it's over.
Austrian empire fought quite decently in XVIII century and first half of the XIX century.
Some people still have a nostalgia for Habsburg empire.
Personally I would prefer a living in pre-French revolution time when modern nationalism, socialism or liberalism didn't existed.
Some people still have a nostalgia for Habsburg empire.
Personally I would prefer a living in pre-French revolution time when modern nationalism, socialism or liberalism didn't existed.
It's fallacious argument about numbers. Russians didn't had numerical superiority in some battles they won.
China during Opium wars had numerical superiority but was defeated by a bunch of Brits.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
