RageFuel Ethnic countries aren't meant to be democracies!

[Transcended Trucel]

Ethnics are too low IQ, too low inhibition, too angry to function in a democracy. This is why only ethnic nations that are stable and prosperous such as China. Have no democracy! Ethnics need strong heavy handed government which forces them to follow it's will! Had India been ran by a CCP type party authoritarian party. It would have been far better off than it is now. A party which would have surpressed all the bullshit religious/caste/region fighting and focused on long term development.


But no these dumb fucking curries chose democracy and everyday millions of Ethnics pay the price !
@ReconElement @wereqryan @Caesercel @Lookscel @curryfool @Zer0/∞ do you think if curry land nations were all strong dictatorships , curries could have pulled a China?
@dominic

 

[Zer0/∞]

Yes, this dumb old foid and her family rule Bangladesh. You get sent to prison if you disagree with her publicly.
Democracy is a corrupt failure in curry land.

Just to think she would've been killed like the rest of her family in the 1975 coup if she hadn't lived in Germany at the time.

 

[Deleted member 34541]

No countries should be democracies.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

No countries should be democracies.

Sure but a country that respects property rights is major key to having a good economy. it's why USA dollar is the king pin of the world economy.

Authoritarian governments are best for thirdworld and second world but for first world, there has to be economic liberalization.

Problem with authoritarian governments is lack of economic liberalization and respect for property rights.

 

[Deleted member 34541]

Sure but a country that respects property rights is major key to having a good economy. it's why USA dollar is the king pin of the world economy.

Authoritarian governments are best for thirdworld and second world but for first world, there has to be economic liberalization.

Problem with authoritarian governments is lack of economic liberalization and respect for property rights.

Okay, you win bc u r high iq ethnic.

 

[Deleted member 23518]

No country is meant to be a democracy. Most cucked form of government ever.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

No country is meant to be a democracy. Most cucked form of government ever.

A heavily restricted democracy would work fine imo, just would need make sure all voters take an education course on history, importance of balance/stability/sacrifice and ban women + low IQs/Simps. Make it so that the ban on women and low IQs/Simps is impossible to ever over turn.

There should be a specialized branch of government which purely exists to make sure that women and simps never gain political power and actively surpresses and assassinates politicans/public figures who advocate for them.

 

[STROUDweeb]

everyone tries to copy the fatass americans with their "democracy" (which is really run by corporations and the rich) and fails oh boy they get to choose between democrat or republican every few years, muh freedom!11!!!!1111

 

[PixyBLACKED]

No countries should be democracies.

THIS

 

[Transcended Trucel]

china is argubly ecnomically more liberal than africa and latin america

the world's most expensive iPhone prices is in Brazil. and PS4, Ps5 xbox... everything eletronics. due to high import taxes.

latin america failed coz they adopted "import substitute" economic policy and got fucked, hard. imagine every nation have to produce its own TV, own computer, own hardware its extremely inefficient and the consumers get FUCKED.

Anglo-countries like Australia new zealand etc. got rid of that stupid policy and thats why they're much better off, despite cant produce any advanced industrial and consumers thing (they export primary goods in exchange of advanced goods).

latin america SUFFERS from democracy greatly. import subsitute is popular coz the stupid voters are prone to nationalism, and local industries lobby for it to curb international competition.

and not to say crime rate. safest period in Brazil was the 80s when the military dictatorship was on. human rights for criminals? nope. you commit crimes you get shot.

there's a very good saying, Latin america dont have the fortune of white western countries (like the fact most citizens in the west are white and therefore less crime and more productive and higher IQ), but all the illnesses (feminism, socialism, human rights, anti-racism (while having a large black population JFL, giga fucked), environmentalism).

Truth. Latin American nations prosper under dictatorships. They have too much nigger and indigenous DNA to prosper under democracy.

Only Uruguay and Argentina are more or less white yet still failed states, but I would say it's due to them being too influenced by surrounding nations maybe. They'd be better off under a dictatorship as well till their respective nations would grow stable and prosperous enough to slowly transition into a democracy.

 

[starcrapoo]

Democracies only work for certain people when it suit the people's mindset to begin with and for them to want it to work. Aka, people that like to complain a lot, really enjoy their individualistic liberties, and are hard to control (folks like the White Anglos and Indians being a prime example). Historically, democracies didn't work in vast flat land areas because armies could swiftly move across the land and control the people if need be by would be strong leaders.

In the modern day, democracies only work when the society is relatively rich and there is no real and serious external threat of invasion, death, and destruction.

Reason being is that firstly, people only care about the direction that the country is headed when they have a "stake" in it. Meaning some property, steady income, and stocks. You would wanna make sure you participate in civic life (in electing officials and holding them accountable) to safeguard your own interests, safety, and security.

It makes no sense to feel a sense of pride, duty, and obligation in the maintenance of democracy when all of that could be taken away by the threat of foreign invasion. In other words, it wouldn't matter what official you voted for and what policies he would implement when everyone is dead from the foreign invasion.

China and Russia for example, have always had a history of being invaded by marauding foreigners. So they always had the need for a strong leader to get them out of their dire situations. That is why that tradition has carried on into the modern day and they seem less democratic and more authoritarian. Also the Russian steppe and the North China plains are vast flat lands where large armies, usually on chariot or cavalry, could mobilize and control the people. Whereas democracies naturally flourished in western Europe and Greece because of the relatively jagged mountainous terrain, making it hard for strong leaders and their armies to mobilize and control the people and keep them in check. So they had to make sure they get everyone's consent on matters.

 

[SerCel]

A lot of them aren't. It's just a facade.

 

[ReconElement]

Ancient India had some democratic Republics as well, some were just invaded and conquered easily by Indo Gangetic Empires, some resisted successfully, democracy is not always bad cos there might be nutjob Socialist or Communists who'd destroy your economy completely China is a misnomer, it's not Communist but a capitalist oligarchy but before it opened up it was not much better than north korea. India is a shithole cos it just never Industrialised, cos democracies just can't take the Social strife and resource capture necessary for industrialisation without disintegrating and falling into a civil war, western powers actually expected India to fail and disintegrate within 15 years of its independence, the thing for which it lasted longer is that it didn't Industrialise and had green revolutions to have adequate agricultural surplus and when Pakistan tried to do Industrialise on east Pakistani agrarian surplus, it disintegrated.

 

[Subhuman Niceguy]

Do you want foids in your country to look like this?

 

[tehgymcel420]