Incelphobes often throw around the word "entitlement" when describing our desire to have a romantic relationship/sex, They imply that being upset about not having this psychological need met is a bad thing. They will often argue that because you do not need a intimacy to survive that we should get over it and accept our place in life as if being alive is the only thing that humans are "entitled" too. Many of the incelphobes that like to make this implication often have left wing views that when observed seem hypocritical considering they have this view of us.
One only must take a look at how these people view homelessness, they often genuinely believe that every single person on this planet is entitled to having a home. They may point to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, the same hierarchy of needs that says intimacy is a psychological need that you need to be mentally well. They will specifically point to Physiological needs section of the hierarchy to say that having a home is a need like having food or water the problem with this can be exposed when taking a closing look, it says "shelter" is that kind of need not a home the many tents you see in homeless encampments absolutely count as shelter, that need for them is being met.
Telling us that we are entitled for wanting a romantic relationship/sex is like telling a homeless person that they are entitled for wanted a home, After all they don't need a shower to survive, clean clothes from a laundry, a nice bed to sleep in or even a kitchen to be able to prepare food in. All of these are luxuries that the average man gets but not the homeless who can survive without all of these things but the life they are living is quite miserable as they don't have access to basic things that many other people get just like us.
These incelphobes suggest that the government should take our taxpayer dollars to fund the building/purchasing of homes for these homeless people and if you think about it this is like giving taxpayer money to prostitutes to fuck incels something they probably completely opposed to. Quite interesting that these people believe in equal outcomes until comes to sex/relationships.
One only must take a look at how these people view homelessness, they often genuinely believe that every single person on this planet is entitled to having a home. They may point to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, the same hierarchy of needs that says intimacy is a psychological need that you need to be mentally well. They will specifically point to Physiological needs section of the hierarchy to say that having a home is a need like having food or water the problem with this can be exposed when taking a closing look, it says "shelter" is that kind of need not a home the many tents you see in homeless encampments absolutely count as shelter, that need for them is being met.
Telling us that we are entitled for wanting a romantic relationship/sex is like telling a homeless person that they are entitled for wanted a home, After all they don't need a shower to survive, clean clothes from a laundry, a nice bed to sleep in or even a kitchen to be able to prepare food in. All of these are luxuries that the average man gets but not the homeless who can survive without all of these things but the life they are living is quite miserable as they don't have access to basic things that many other people get just like us.
These incelphobes suggest that the government should take our taxpayer dollars to fund the building/purchasing of homes for these homeless people and if you think about it this is like giving taxpayer money to prostitutes to fuck incels something they probably completely opposed to. Quite interesting that these people believe in equal outcomes until comes to sex/relationships.
