PM_ME_STRIPPERS
IYAIYAI
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 15,813
He killed fellow incels too, why should he be recognised at all?
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:He killed fellow incels too, why should he be recognised at all?
Akarin said:he stopped their suffering
a saint indeed
Afterlife cope.Rahmawn said:He sent them to a better place. Mercy killing.
You can't disprove the possibility of an afterlife. But yes it is a cope.PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:Afterlife cope.
Rahmawn said:You can't disprove the possibility of an afterlife. But yes it is a cope.
opsec said:he brought those brothers what they seek, and what the normies run away from. death. may they be forgiven and accepted.
QuantumDummy said:The guy had a BMW, ya can't top that.
Akarin said:he stopped their suffering
a saint indeed
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:who is he to choose or say who lives or dies?
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:You are right, no one can 100 % disprove the possibility of an afterlife, but all the evidence today has suggested that an afterlife does not exist and this is the only life we have
blickpall said:Lol. What evidence is that, exactly?
Indari said:calling him a hero is just being edgy. incels relate to him because of how he wrote about loneliness
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:He killed fellow incels too, why should he be recognised at all?
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:He killed fellow incels too, why should he be recognised at all?
idkwattodowithlife said:Agreed, mass murdering, and killing others/innocents is stupid.
Kointo said:Doing anything as a human being is stupid.
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:science?
blickpall said:Ok, how does "science" disprove the presence of an afterlife?
Kointo said:It's illogical to think that a man made concept like an afterlife exists. All we have are religious texts and documents saying they exist. Religious texts and documents aren't to be trusted since they are meant to mentally and emotionally take over and control the minds of the population to keep them in check.
blickpall said:I've yet to hear any scientific evidence that the afterlife does not exist. I thought scientists needed evidence for their claims?
Kointo said:I'm no scientist. I've seen no evidence for the existence of an afterlife, so therefore I disregard the concept.
There exists no soul in the body, only the brain.
There's evidence for the brain existing, but none for a soul existing.
blickpall said:Okay well you jumped into a conversation where PM_ME_STRIPPERS said that science proves that there is no afterlife, not the absence of proof, so I'd like to see that proof.
Akarin said:he stopped their suffering
a saint indeed
like making into that fucking sororityoilonthe-Rose said:He stood for the right things I suppose. Not as good as Dylan or Eric but good nonetheless. If his plan worked he would be an even better hero
Kointo said:Oh well I guess he's wrong then. It's just stupid to believe in anything without substantial proof.
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:You are right, no one can 100 % disprove the possibility of an afterlife, but all the evidence today has suggested that an afterlife does not exist and this is the only life we have
Kointo said:
If he existed I would kill him
nausea said:1 god
2 man
3 horse
4 dog
5 woman
6 rat
7 insect
4-3 could be switched, though
Kointo said:1. Nothing
Nothing has worth, only mass and gravitational pull.
nausea said:if you start with nothing you will end with nothing
He put them out of their misERyPM_ME_STRIPPERS said:He killed fellow incels too
Kointo said:What are you referring to?
nausea said:to your brain
Kointo said:Then you are wrong. I started as a Catholic.
nausea said:no, I am referring to the fact that our ancestors "invented" god\gods\spirits etc
Kointo said:You're right in saying it's a man made concept. What does this have to do with starting and ending with nothing?
nausea said:you have plastered this page with images, now my poor pc cannot handle it...
may I tag you in one of my offtopic threads? there the answer
blickpall said:Okay well you jumped into a conversation where PM_ME_STRIPPERS said that science proves that there is no afterlife, not the absence of proof, so I'd like to see that proof.
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:i didnt say science proves no afterlife at all, what i meant is is that from what we have learned over the years it is highly improbable for an afterlife to exist
PM_ME_STRIPPERS said:but all the evidence today has suggested that an afterlife does not exist and this is the only life we have
blickpall said:This is what you said:
What is this evidence?
What have we learned over the years that makes it highly improbable for an afterlife to exist?
Weed said:wait wat you're a mod? : D When did that happen? Congrats.