BornToLose
Oops!... I lost again
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2021
- Posts
- 11,822
Wtaf?Hello everyone there. ER was DEFINITELY handsome according to the cannon of masculine beauty of many countries including Colombia for example, and Venezuela. ER was hideous according to the canon of masculine beauty in Califorina USA though. He definitely could have had thousands of women in southamerica and the caribbean. Not merely for money but for his look. His look is that of a K-POP star.
As a researcher of the porn ideology (please check my book called: Refutando a Amarna Miller, google it) and the Incel movement I can say that each culture in each moment of the human history has had a different cannon of masculine beauty, the Chad paradigm only exists in the western mind and culture. It is not created by evolution but by social construction.
Globalization is imposing the usanian californian cannon all over the world and that is the problem. So there is no black pill as a biological condenmation. Do not blame evolution blame the culture. The solution will appear historically, when the western civilization decays. I admire the Incel theory, it is brilliant, the discovery of the influence of the chin bone structure in sexual atraction is amazing. Real geniouses. You guys are creating a new sociology. You will influence the antropology of the next centuries. But, the only mistake of the Incel movemnet is believing in the Blackpill. Obviously redpill is false as well. The looks theory is true, but the cause of the sexual segregation in which the Chad is the preferred type is not a biological or evolutionary cause. Chads would be considerd ugly and not masculine by many cultures of the human history. I repeat, the hegemony of the "Chad" is just a cultural momentary tendency not a biological evolutionary pattern. As a cultural tendendy It has expiration date.
Hope you guys let me continue researching more into the Incel vision of the world. I am sure your looks theory will be accepted and respected one day. The future will tell that you were right in that point. I only try to make and contribute with a correction, pointing that the root cause of this situation is the culture and denying any evolutionary explanation at all.