News El Salvador frees 3 women who murdered their children

[CrackingYs]

3 women were sentenced to 30 years in prison for murdering their babies by abortion and of course the feminist brigade has come to their rescue and got them out of jail after just a few years

NPR Cookie Consent and Choices

Like goddamnit, El Salvador you were so close to being based. If they had jailed the feminists who protested their incarceration then maybe you could have made progress.

 

[Rhaast]

Dis nigga?

 

[trying to ascend]

Nothing impressive if compared to the US or europe tbh.

Millions of women kill their children's there and receive no legal punishment.

Also, thanks US for that, because leftists from latin america get their ideas from US leftists

 

[Deleted member 36666]

It's the mens' fault for having penises and fucking us!

 

[Hoteldoor]

Just rejoice in the knowledge that abortion will make foids stomach loose and thus more shit looking

 

[incel_wolf]

In western countries, foids do abortions on a daily basis.

 

[CrackingYs]

Just rejoice in the knowledge that abortion will make foids stomach loose and thus more shit looking

Not really. When a foid aborts her baby she will typically do it at least 6 months before the due date, long before they develop stretch masks.

 

[Hoteldoor]

Doesn't that only apply to cesar abortion?

 

[trying to ascend]

banning abortion only lead to ramphant violence in the society. all the excess births ultimately lead to excess murders.

Yes bro, because 40 million (worldwide) murders are avoided because of abortion

 

[trying to ascend]

abortion is based

the link of abortion vs. crime rate is proven by studies.

I know it does, but so would do sterilizing or mass murdering poor people

 

[Hoteldoor]

The thing about abortion is you aren't killing humans who actually has become human, you're getting rid of tumors that has the potential to be a human

 

[trying to ascend]

The thing about abortion is you aren't killing humans who actually has become human, you're getting rid of tumors that has the potential to be a human

No, they are part of the human species, you don't change of species during gestation

 

[Hoteldoor]

No, they are part of the human species, you don't change of species during gestation

When you get rid of their metaphorical meaning and potential, they're tumors in wombs that doesn't do anything except acts like parasitic helminth
Different from poor people that despite being poor already has all features a human might be expected to have, like limbs that aren't just nubs

 

[Inceloner]

Bitcucks exposed once again

 

[trying to ascend]

When you get rid of their metaphorical meaning and potential, they're tumors in wombs that doesn't do anything except acts like parasitic helminth
Different from poor people that despite being poor already has all features a human might be expected to have, like limbs that aren't just nubs

Wdym by potential? They are already human and alive, therefore they shouldn't be klilled.

The only needed feature is to have enough chromossomes, then you are already part of the human species. Women can't gestate organisms of other species.

Thing is, if you create a human life, which implies putting someone in a situation of need, you shall be forced to meet that person's need.

P¹ If you put someone in a situation of need, you shall meet the person's need till they can leave that situation or till someone else agree to meet them.
P² A woman who consents to sex is consenting to the risks of sex, these include putting someone in that situation of needs.
C The woman who gets pregnant via consensual sex shall meet the needs of the child

P¹A fetus is gestated by a human woman
P²Human women can only gestate organisms of the human species
C The fetus is an organism of the human species

Is there something wrong with my reasoning?

 

[CrackingYs]

The thing about abortion is you aren't killing humans who actually has become human, you're getting rid of tumors that has the potential to be a human

Legal abortion allows women to kill babies as a form of birth control. Women want this this to be a right, and don't want men to have this right. Basically if you support abortion, you support women being able to fuck Chad rawdog and get creampied by multiple guys a week and then murder the baby. Also abortion doesn't reduce the population because it doesn't prevent future babies from being born, and women who have lots of abortions usually end up having lots of children anyways.

I think we need to add abortion facts to a wiki or something cause theres just so many retarded greycels who think abortion is a good thing, when it directly supports inceldom the same way that sex out of wedlock and AOC does.

 

[Hoteldoor]

Wdym by potential? They are already human and alive, therefore they shouldn't be klilled.

The only needed feature is to have enough chromossomes, then you are already part of the human species. Women can't gestate organisms of other species.

Thing is, if you create a human life, which implies putting someone in a situation of need, you shall be forced to meet that person's need.

P¹ If you put someone in a situation of need, you shall meet the person's need till they can leave that situation or till someone else agree to meet them.
P² A woman who consents to sex is consenting to the risks of sex, these include putting someone in that situation of needs.
C The woman who gets pregnant via consensual sex shall meet the needs of the child

P¹A fetus is gestated by a human woman
P²Human women can only gestate organisms of the human species
C The fetus is an organism of the human species

Is there something wrong with my reasoning?

Well i don't understand how you can view them as humans, i mean a newborn i can understand but considering fetuses are just lumps of meat without a fully formed sentience and limbs, i don't really get how you view them as fully humans maybe pseudo humans at most

Legal abortion allows women to kill babies as a form of birth control. Women want this this to be a right, and don't want men to have this right. Basically if you support abortion, you support women being able to fuck Chad rawdog and get creampied by multiple guys a week and then murder the baby. Also abortion doesn't reduce the population because it doesn't prevent future babies from being born, and women who have lots of abortions usually end up having lots of children anyways.

I think we need to add abortion facts to a wiki or something cause theres just so many retarded greycels who think abortion is a good thing, when it directly supports inceldom the same way that sex out of wedlock and AOC does.

Well i mean i get seeing those foids squirms as they're forced to care about some moving tumor is pretty neat, but what i don't get is people thinking they're actually killing human beings when in fact they're killing some unformed embryos

 

[trying to ascend]

Well i don't understand how you can view them as humans, i mean a newborn i can understand but considering fetuses are just lumps of meat without a fully formed sentience and limbs, i don't really get how you view them as fully humans maybe pseudo humans at most

They are not just lumps of meet, they can survive on a nutrient basis, therefore they don't even need maternal tissue.

Self-organization of the human embryo in the absence of maternal tissues - PubMed

Remodelling of the human embryo at implantation is indispensable for successful pregnancy. Yet it has remained mysterious because of the experimental hurdles that beset the study of this developmental phase. Here, we establish an in vitro system to culture human embryos through implantation...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Why does sentience matter? Because it implies pain? If that's your reasoning, I disagree.

Because they are part of the human species, they already have enough chromossomes to be considered part of it. Also, I don't see any biologist saying that embryos, zigotes and fetuses are from different species than their mother's one

 

[CrackingYs]

Well i don't understand how you can view them as humans, i mean a newborn i can understand but considering fetuses are just lumps of meat without a fully formed sentience and limbs, i don't really get how you view them as fully humans maybe pseudo humans at most

Well i mean i get seeing those foids squirms as they're forced to care about some moving tumor is pretty neat, but what i don't get is people thinking they're actually killing human beings when in fact they're killing some unformed embryos

It would be very difficult to determine when sentience occurs in a child. It probably occurs around 2 or 3 years old, long after being born. But regardless, a non sentient human is generally considered to be a human. People who are brain dead, and foids, are considered human.

I'll point out again, that abortion gives rights to females that are not granted to males, and it allows women to be whores and use taxpayer funded services to have unprotected sex with lots of men out of wedlock.... all stuff that worsens inceldom by keeping women out of marriage.

 

[Hoteldoor]

They are not just lumps of meet, they can survive on a nutrient basis, therefore they don't even need maternal tissue.

Self-organization of the human embryo in the absence of maternal tissues - PubMed

Remodelling of the human embryo at implantation is indispensable for successful pregnancy. Yet it has remained mysterious because of the experimental hurdles that beset the study of this developmental phase. Here, we establish an in vitro system to culture human embryos through implantation...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Why does sentience matter? Because it implies pain? If that's your reasoning, I disagree.

Because they are part of the human species, they already have enough chromossomes to be considered part of it. Also, I don't see any biologist saying that embryos, zigotes and fetuses are from different species than their mother's one

I'm not talking in any of the three metaphysical branch here, i am saying that physically they're just globs of flesh that could barely be counted as their own living being and functionally they would die when severed from their nurture chamber

 

[trying to ascend]

I'm not talking in any of the three metaphysical branch here, i am saying that physically they're just globs of flesh that could barely be counted as their own living being and functionally they would die when severed from their nurture chamber

Yes, still doesn't imply they are not human

 

[Hoteldoor]

Well this is getting nowhere for me, i seem to have failed understanding that logic but it's not like incomprehension is a rare occurrence
But well i respect your opinion