H
HateCurry
Banned
-
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2022
- Posts
- 4,303
"If you attack humans but refuse to attack animals, unless it's because you only hate humans rather than viewing animal abuse as more immoral, you're a hypocrite. YOU DO NOT HAVE MORALS YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE. Killing animals is NOT worse than killing humans.
FIRST ARGUMENT THESE HUMANS USE: But animals are innocent and they don't do anything
This is FALSE. People solely believe this because animals cannot talk and look adorable. ANIMALS ARE NOT INNOCENT IN THE SLIGHTEST.
In fact, animals DO know right from wrong and DO have morals. Although the vast majority of their behavior was prosocial or positive and aggression or violence was rare, this still wasn't universal. In fact, animals CAN do immoral things. Rape is found in many species, and animals have raped each other. Even child abuse happens in other species. Animals often start rival wars and kill each other, and even chimps have as much of a homicide rate as humans. Many species do it even more than humans by killing their own species.
Animals DO have morals and know right from wrong and you can't assume otherwise because they don't talk. Many will maul you on sight even if you do nothing wrong.
Argument 2: animals are vulnerable or you're a coward if you hurt them
This is bullshit. Unless you have a weapon many animals aren't vulnerable and maul you on sight. And you can't argue it's wrong because they're vulnerable. Many humans are vulnerable too. Even grown men. If you're a man attacking another man he could be smaller than you yet nobody will care if you attack a guy smaller than you yet they freak out if you mildly hit a woman's face. In fact, nobody cares if I use guns on a muscular man or ambush him. In that case, he IS vulnerable. If you are a small scrawny nerd and you use a gun on a big muscular guy HE IS THE VULNERABLE ONE. He's 100% vulnerable. He moves any muscle, he dies. In fact, smaller people can easily overpower bigger people by using weapons and objects to compensate for size differences. You can also ambush them which also makes them completely vulnerable. A person doesn't have to be physically vulnerable to be easy to attack. Circumstantial vulnerability is just as common if not more. How is using a gun on a big muscular guy worse than using it on a fuckin bear who is way more physically powerful than a big muscular guy.
And many animal abusers aren't afraid to attack humans. Many do. In fact, its quite common. Many of them often commit a lot of violence or serious crime, including against other humans. There's a link between animal cruelty and violence against humans. They aren't cowards. They're just generally vicious criminals.
Argument 3: animal abusers are sadists
no. they aren't doing it for sadism. In a study of undergrad students, they found 55% committed animal abuse at least once. They usually did it out of anger/prejudice, amusement/fun, or fear or disliking the animal. Usually it was out of anger/prejudice. These aren't sadists. In a sample of inmates, ones who admitted to animal abuse did it for fun, imitation or out of anger. Sadism is defined as "the tendency to derive pleasure, especially sexual gratification, from inflicting pain, suffering, or humiliation on others." This isn't sadism. Sadists don't do it out of anger or for fun/amusement. They simply want to watch one suffer for pleasure, especially sexual pleasure."
@Edmund_Kemper said this in response to a guy who talked about celebration of animal abuse on this forum.
Edmund just started the misery olympics from here on in. The original poster Edmund is replying to never incited any violence let alone comparison to incels with animals. Edmund THINKS he is worth MORE than animals, and goes on hating people who simply care for innocent animals who didn't do shit.
He talks about the fact that animals rape. Incels rape too. Incels are MOST LIKELY TO RAPE BECAUSE they aren't satisfied and they're the MOST DESPERATE among all other men.
The fundamental principle is:
DON'T MAKE EXCUSES FOR PEOPLE WHO MAKE EXCUSES for genocide and torture, animal abuse etc.
Now, Edward also talked about the fact that humans are more innocent than animals and that animals aren't innocent yada yada.
Dude. Nobody drove a comparison except YOU. You are the One who went into this game of misery olympics talking about how a cow dying is worth less than you just not getting to date.
BE THANKFUL FOR BEING A HUMAN GUYS. Cherish life, there is so much, the more you indulge in misery Olympics the more you lose your _braincels_
We are the best species on Earth, please appreciate it, I know Chad's living a better life, but you have it way better than animals @Edmund_Kemper .
FIRST ARGUMENT THESE HUMANS USE: But animals are innocent and they don't do anything
This is FALSE. People solely believe this because animals cannot talk and look adorable. ANIMALS ARE NOT INNOCENT IN THE SLIGHTEST.
In fact, animals DO know right from wrong and DO have morals. Although the vast majority of their behavior was prosocial or positive and aggression or violence was rare, this still wasn't universal. In fact, animals CAN do immoral things. Rape is found in many species, and animals have raped each other. Even child abuse happens in other species. Animals often start rival wars and kill each other, and even chimps have as much of a homicide rate as humans. Many species do it even more than humans by killing their own species.
Animals DO have morals and know right from wrong and you can't assume otherwise because they don't talk. Many will maul you on sight even if you do nothing wrong.
Argument 2: animals are vulnerable or you're a coward if you hurt them
This is bullshit. Unless you have a weapon many animals aren't vulnerable and maul you on sight. And you can't argue it's wrong because they're vulnerable. Many humans are vulnerable too. Even grown men. If you're a man attacking another man he could be smaller than you yet nobody will care if you attack a guy smaller than you yet they freak out if you mildly hit a woman's face. In fact, nobody cares if I use guns on a muscular man or ambush him. In that case, he IS vulnerable. If you are a small scrawny nerd and you use a gun on a big muscular guy HE IS THE VULNERABLE ONE. He's 100% vulnerable. He moves any muscle, he dies. In fact, smaller people can easily overpower bigger people by using weapons and objects to compensate for size differences. You can also ambush them which also makes them completely vulnerable. A person doesn't have to be physically vulnerable to be easy to attack. Circumstantial vulnerability is just as common if not more. How is using a gun on a big muscular guy worse than using it on a fuckin bear who is way more physically powerful than a big muscular guy.
And many animal abusers aren't afraid to attack humans. Many do. In fact, its quite common. Many of them often commit a lot of violence or serious crime, including against other humans. There's a link between animal cruelty and violence against humans. They aren't cowards. They're just generally vicious criminals.
Argument 3: animal abusers are sadists
no. they aren't doing it for sadism. In a study of undergrad students, they found 55% committed animal abuse at least once. They usually did it out of anger/prejudice, amusement/fun, or fear or disliking the animal. Usually it was out of anger/prejudice. These aren't sadists. In a sample of inmates, ones who admitted to animal abuse did it for fun, imitation or out of anger. Sadism is defined as "the tendency to derive pleasure, especially sexual gratification, from inflicting pain, suffering, or humiliation on others." This isn't sadism. Sadists don't do it out of anger or for fun/amusement. They simply want to watch one suffer for pleasure, especially sexual pleasure."
@Edmund_Kemper said this in response to a guy who talked about celebration of animal abuse on this forum.
Edmund just started the misery olympics from here on in. The original poster Edmund is replying to never incited any violence let alone comparison to incels with animals. Edmund THINKS he is worth MORE than animals, and goes on hating people who simply care for innocent animals who didn't do shit.
He talks about the fact that animals rape. Incels rape too. Incels are MOST LIKELY TO RAPE BECAUSE they aren't satisfied and they're the MOST DESPERATE among all other men.
The fundamental principle is:
DON'T MAKE EXCUSES FOR PEOPLE WHO MAKE EXCUSES for genocide and torture, animal abuse etc.
Now, Edward also talked about the fact that humans are more innocent than animals and that animals aren't innocent yada yada.
Dude. Nobody drove a comparison except YOU. You are the One who went into this game of misery olympics talking about how a cow dying is worth less than you just not getting to date.
BE THANKFUL FOR BEING A HUMAN GUYS. Cherish life, there is so much, the more you indulge in misery Olympics the more you lose your _braincels_
We are the best species on Earth, please appreciate it, I know Chad's living a better life, but you have it way better than animals @Edmund_Kemper .