
aikido
Greycel
★
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2023
- Posts
- 28
Once Upon A Time In America,
an average man working an average job married to an average woman, could own an average house, have a couple kids and pretty much be financially stable.
So why is that, 100 years later, wages are still the same but the cost of living so much higher?
For the sake of not straying off topic and/or repeating what many of you already know, I will not delve deep into the history books to list every single aspect of what changed between then and now.
I will mostly focus on the workforce, compare the differences between both periods and extrapolate it's consequences.
100 years ago vs today workforce demographics
On one hand, we have a working pool mostly consisting of men, while the majority of women stayed at home performing housekeeping and nurturing tasks.
Some decades later, we found ourselves with a workforce consisting of men and women. The workforce basically doubled (in proportion since total population increased). So we needed to also double the total of jobs. But how?
If some decades ago, with less technological advancements and half the workforce, we were perfectly capable of ensuring our food and habitational needs, what jobs exactly are we going to create to accommodate women coming in the workforce?
Bullshit jobs.
Corporate lawyers, administrators, consultants, telemarketers, service personnel, human resources, public relations consultants, "influencers" (...). Any employedcel can easily add 5/10 more to the list.
My point when I say these jobs are "bullshit jobs" is that a LOT these female oriented jobs are meaningless, unnecessary and have no real value. Most of these bullshit jobs are just made up middle-management positions with no other use than to justify the careers of the people performing them.
How to determine if a certain job belongs to this category? Just imagine it disappeared tomorrow.
Let's Imagine a world without farmers. (death)
Now imagine a world without HR.
The real life proof that this is true is the latest acquisition of twitter by Elon Musk.
First thing he did was layoff of 3700 "workers" (mostly useless females).
(before and after the purge)
And to the surprise of the retarded bluepill degenerate liberals, twitter is still running.
Consequences of women "working" and bullshit jobs
1. Increased cost of living
Money is only a reflection of created value.
If you don't create any actual value but still attribute a monetary value to that (in other words, if you pay to a useless woman to do a useless job) you end up with a more money but less corresponding value to that money.
That is pretty much the definition of inflation.
In the end, everyone gets paid less (actually wages are pretty much the same while taxes + cost of living increases which translates to the same end result).
This is also one of the reasonsjews governments are so afraid of bitcoin. Governments that control their own currencies have the ability to inflate money supply, this is what has been happening in major developed economies.
2. Increased Hypergamy
In the past century, for a woman to be financially secure, she had to be married to a man that provided for her.
Well, in today's society, women want (and have) everything (and more) that men have.
This has allowed them, whether by accident or design (probably the latter), to bypass their beta bucks and incur directly in open hypergamy since they are no longer financially restrained from indulging in these degenerate behaviors (to a certain extent).
Conclusion
We created BS jobs to accommodate for women in the workforce which led to increased inflation/cost of living and increased hypergamy by giving them financial freedom to incur in their degenerate behavior.
I feel like this topic has much more to unravel.
Feel free to add your own take.

an average man working an average job married to an average woman, could own an average house, have a couple kids and pretty much be financially stable.
So why is that, 100 years later, wages are still the same but the cost of living so much higher?
For the sake of not straying off topic and/or repeating what many of you already know, I will not delve deep into the history books to list every single aspect of what changed between then and now.
I will mostly focus on the workforce, compare the differences between both periods and extrapolate it's consequences.
100 years ago vs today workforce demographics
On one hand, we have a working pool mostly consisting of men, while the majority of women stayed at home performing housekeeping and nurturing tasks.
Some decades later, we found ourselves with a workforce consisting of men and women. The workforce basically doubled (in proportion since total population increased). So we needed to also double the total of jobs. But how?
If some decades ago, with less technological advancements and half the workforce, we were perfectly capable of ensuring our food and habitational needs, what jobs exactly are we going to create to accommodate women coming in the workforce?
Bullshit jobs.
Corporate lawyers, administrators, consultants, telemarketers, service personnel, human resources, public relations consultants, "influencers" (...). Any employedcel can easily add 5/10 more to the list.
My point when I say these jobs are "bullshit jobs" is that a LOT these female oriented jobs are meaningless, unnecessary and have no real value. Most of these bullshit jobs are just made up middle-management positions with no other use than to justify the careers of the people performing them.
How to determine if a certain job belongs to this category? Just imagine it disappeared tomorrow.
Let's Imagine a world without farmers. (death)
Now imagine a world without HR.
The real life proof that this is true is the latest acquisition of twitter by Elon Musk.
First thing he did was layoff of 3700 "workers" (mostly useless females).

(before and after the purge)
And to the surprise of the retarded bluepill degenerate liberals, twitter is still running.
Consequences of women "working" and bullshit jobs
1. Increased cost of living
Money is only a reflection of created value.
If you don't create any actual value but still attribute a monetary value to that (in other words, if you pay to a useless woman to do a useless job) you end up with a more money but less corresponding value to that money.
That is pretty much the definition of inflation.
In the end, everyone gets paid less (actually wages are pretty much the same while taxes + cost of living increases which translates to the same end result).
This is also one of the reasons
2. Increased Hypergamy
In the past century, for a woman to be financially secure, she had to be married to a man that provided for her.
Well, in today's society, women want (and have) everything (and more) that men have.
This has allowed them, whether by accident or design (probably the latter), to bypass their beta bucks and incur directly in open hypergamy since they are no longer financially restrained from indulging in these degenerate behaviors (to a certain extent).
Conclusion
We created BS jobs to accommodate for women in the workforce which led to increased inflation/cost of living and increased hypergamy by giving them financial freedom to incur in their degenerate behavior.
I feel like this topic has much more to unravel.
Feel free to add your own take.
Last edited: