Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Economic consequences of feminism

aikido

aikido

Greycel
Joined
Jul 7, 2023
Posts
28
Once Upon A Time In America,


Once%2BUpon%2BA%2BTime%2BIn%2BAmerica%2B2.jpg



an average man working an average job married to an average woman, could own an average house, have a couple kids and pretty much be financially stable.

So why is that, 100 years later, wages are still the same but the cost of living so much higher?

For the sake of not straying off topic and/or repeating what many of you already know, I will not delve deep into the history books to list every single aspect of what changed between then and now.

I will mostly focus on the workforce, compare the differences between both periods and extrapolate it's consequences.




100 years ago vs today workforce demographics

On one hand, we have a working pool mostly consisting of men, while the majority of women stayed at home performing housekeeping and nurturing tasks.

Some decades later, we found ourselves with a workforce consisting of men and women. The workforce basically doubled (in proportion since total population increased). So we needed to also double the total of jobs. But how?

If some decades ago, with less technological advancements and half the workforce, we were perfectly capable of ensuring our food and habitational needs, what jobs exactly are we going to create to accommodate women coming in the workforce?


Bullshit jobs.

Corporate lawyers, administrators, consultants, telemarketers, service personnel, human resources, public relations consultants, "influencers" (...). Any employedcel can easily add 5/10 more to the list.

My point when I say these jobs are "bullshit jobs" is that a LOT these female oriented jobs are meaningless, unnecessary and have no real value. Most of these bullshit jobs are just made up middle-management positions with no other use than to justify the careers of the people performing them.

How to determine if a certain job belongs to this category? Just imagine it disappeared tomorrow.

Let's Imagine a world without farmers. (death)

Now imagine a world without HR. :lul:


The real life proof that this is true is the latest acquisition of twitter by Elon Musk.
First thing he did was layoff of 3700 "workers" (mostly useless females).

iu

(before and after the purge)

And to the surprise of the retarded bluepill degenerate liberals, twitter is still running.


Consequences of women "working" and bullshit jobs

1. Increased cost of living


Money is only a reflection of created value.

If you don't create any actual value but still attribute a monetary value to that (in other words, if you pay to a useless woman to do a useless job) you end up with a more money but less corresponding value to that money.

That is pretty much the definition of inflation.

In the end, everyone gets paid less (actually wages are pretty much the same while taxes + cost of living increases which translates to the same end result).

This is also one of the reasons jews governments are so afraid of bitcoin. Governments that control their own currencies have the ability to inflate money supply, this is what has been happening in major developed economies.


2. Increased Hypergamy

In the past century, for a woman to be financially secure, she had to be married to a man that provided for her.

Well, in today's society, women want (and have) everything (and more) that men have.

This has allowed them, whether by accident or design (probably the latter), to bypass their beta bucks and incur directly in open hypergamy since they are no longer financially restrained from indulging in these degenerate behaviors (to a certain extent).


Conclusion
We created BS jobs to accommodate for women in the workforce which led to increased inflation/cost of living and increased hypergamy by giving them financial freedom to incur in their degenerate behavior.


I feel like this topic has much more to unravel.
Feel free to add your own take.
 
Last edited:
just so brutal seeing a long GrAYpost with no replies.
 
Liberals wonder why everything costs more after letting women and immigrants be employed en masse. No shit, labour is worth less if there are more people to do it.
 
Liberals wonder why everything costs more after letting women and immigrants be employed en masse. No shit, labour is worth less if there are more people to do it.
Plus they are less qualified or blatant diversity hiring ... This bullshit only works in a world where every nation abides to these drawbacks, which is not the case for ultre competitive nationalistic places like China for instance.
 
This is also one of the reasons jews governments are so afraid of bitcoin. Governments that control their own currencies have the ability to inflate money supply, this is what has been happening in major developed economies.
Based.

BUY BITCOINS BEFORE STATE ISSUED PRINTER MONEY IS WORTH HUMAN FECES
 
The consequence is total societal collapse and demographic replacement with browns that don't believe all the cucked shit
 
[Laughs in Yiddish]
 
demographic population collapse, the result is an aging population and imported shitskins holding the future expectation that they are going to keep the economy afloat as the natives decided to be degenerates instead of having children by keeping women in check.
 
People like us missed out on the fun stuff in the past (wife, sex, well paying jobs) but we are still to young to have the fun stuff in the future (hyper advanced ai sex dolls).

The best we can get Is porn and plastic mannequins.
 
Yes. Its unbelievable in a way that even after all of this bullshit, women still act with hypergamy in their minds. Feminists say they hate sexism, yet expect men still to be providers and stay in our traditional roles. Which of course is more proof that feminism = faux equality.
 
Yes, w0men also drive inflation, since w0men are consumers.
 
the only solution is accelerationism - collective consequences for all

why should incels and beta bear all the burden
 
First thing he did was layoff of 3700 "workers" (mostly useless females).
That's why so many people were seething over it, because it effect foids and their useless "lazy girl jobs" while more men remained unaffected.
If you don't create any actual value but still attribute a monetary value to that (in other words, if you pay to a useless woman to do a useless job) you end up with a more money but less corresponding value to that money.
Excellent point that I had not really considered before, thank you for sharing and for this post.
 
this doesn't cover all issues, but these are great points.

foids entering the workforce also devalued labor by flooding the amount available, foids are less likely to argue for raises and less likely to unionize. both of those also cause wages to stagnate
 
Feminism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
 
So if you think about it, money is just about who has some universal credit to buy stuff like food, shelter, new Iphone. When wages are paid you get some of this credit, and then you can buy stuff with it. When your company has to hire more, but it isn't earning more, you know your pay is going to be affected. When nothing jobs are so common, that means your job might be what keeps the company operational, but that isn't considered. And then if these women are paid for the very little their job is needed, reflected accurately like it should be, then PC culture will step in, make some pretext that they seriously believe in because they are idiots about wage-gap or whatever, and suddenly it's not reflected accurately and your pay is going to them; a systematic betabucks.
 
Rocket science tier analysis
 
I'm about to complete a degree in economics and OP is right
 
Add in some data, graphs and charts, several more paragraphs of padding, and you have yourself a certified article.

[Laughs in Yiddish]
Are you Black Israelite for real, or do you just larp as one? Serious.
 
Rare high IQ GrAY post. Well done.
 
Corporate lawyers, administrators, consultants, telemarketers, service personnel, human resources, public relations consultants, "influencers" (...).
While I don't agree that all the jobs in this list are useless (e.g., corporate lawyers and consultants) your point still stands. On the whole I agree with you're nicely writ concise post.
If you don't create any actual value but still attribute a monetary value to that (in other words, if you pay to a useless woman to do a useless job) you end up with a more money but less corresponding value to that money.
The only way to get more money is to print more. You shoulnd't end up with more money per se, but, since the same amount of money is being stretched more thinly, its purchasing power does take a nosedive. Right?
 
Good thread, welcome to the forum.
 
The only way to get more money is to print more.
Not to simple unfortunately. Most money isn't even physical money. Most of it is debt, just digital numbers created out of nothing (what is called commercial bank money). Post WW2 physical money was around 20%. As of today, that value is around 3-5%.

I might actually make a thread on the topic of how governments and (especially) jews private banks control the issuing of currency and why, for example, bitcoin represents an existential threat to this sector.
You shoulnd't end up with more money per se, but, since the same amount of money is being stretched more thinly, its purchasing power does take a nosedive. Right?
You do actually end up with more money in absolute terms. It's just the ratio of money to corresponding value that decreases ( > inflation). The end result is the same (purchasing power decreases) though.
 
how can foids say that they want equality but only want 6ft+ tall richfags?

men that are 6ft or taller that earn six figures are rare.

thats why civilization is collapsing.
 
Not to simple unfortunately. Most money isn't even physical money. Most of it is debt, just digital numbers created out of nothing (what is called commercial bank money). Post WW2 physical money was around 20%. As of today, that value is around 3-5%.
Right, I forgot about that chicanery. My bad. No wonder I always hated economics; nothing is ever as straightforward as it should be.
 
Let's Imagine a world without farmers. (death)

Now imagine a world without HR. :lul:
HR has its role for conflict resolution, it's just that modern HR is dominated by foids who just love drama and have no interest in solving problems. Men do it much more logically and effectively
 
First it was give foids rights and now it's gotten bad it'll only get worse before it gets better.

Not to take from from your shine as your thread was wonderful to read.
 

Similar threads

Just say NIGGER!
Replies
17
Views
990
Just say NIGGER!
Just say NIGGER!
nogymforyourface
Replies
8
Views
534
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
RealSchizo
Replies
1
Views
547
DarkStar
DarkStar
B
Replies
11
Views
747
Yabadadabadoo
Yabadadabadoo
PersonaPimp
Replies
9
Views
857
Genetics_subhuman
Genetics_subhuman

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top