Easy for a top male to be incel -against fakecel nonsense-

[Rightful anger]

Hi all. I am of the opinion that most men are or have been incels. We are literally 90%+ of the male population or have been. Our main problem is female behaviour not "chads".

1) "B-but if you can get with a breathing woman then you are fakecel." No, a 9/10 that can only date 5/10s is incel because he cannot find a woman in his own league. Many chads are incels, often in denial, because they have to settle.

2) A landwhale has more choices than a male chad on a dating site. Any statistic will show this. Average woman can pick from around 20,000+ men on HotorNot. Average men from 0 women. Chad men from 10-100 or so women.

Long story short, if you cannot find a female version of yourself, only below, you are incel. A top tier male will not feel attracted to 5/10s, will not be happy around them. He is incel. Retarded for a starting movement to restrict its potential appeal.

 

[Deleted member 2119]

"No, a 9/10 that can only date 5/10s is incel because he cannot find a woman in his own league"
I highly disagree. That is just a word game in my opinion and changing the definition of the word.

Our real problems are not Chads or Stacies. They are a product of a free society combined with the human nature.

 

[KyloRen]

 

[Deleted member 1983]

 

[Rightful anger]

"No, a 9/10 that can only date 5/10s is incel because he cannot find a woman in his own league"
I highly disagree. That is just a word game in my opinion and changing the definition of the word.

Our real problems are not Chads or Stacies. They are a product of a free society combined with the human nature.

No, it isn't. A 9/10 male and a 5/10 female belong in different genetic groups independent from each other. She is no excuse to call him fakecel.

 

[The End]

Well since I can't find anyone below me, I must be at the very bottom.

Great. What the fuck do I care. Dammit.

 

[Deleted member 2119]

No, it isn't. A 9/10 male and a 5/10 female belong in different genetic groups independent from each other. She is no excuse to call him fakecel.

involuntary celibate
He would actively reject a passable female. It does not matter what he should get

 

[Izayacel]

why give 1 shit when you can give none

 

[TheRealChincel]

 

[acnescarcel]

hahaha wtf

 

[Rightful anger]

involuntary celibate
He would actively reject a passable female. It does not matter what he should get

If you could potentially get into a relationship with a female dog, would that mean you can't be incel?

 

[Deleted member 2119]

If you could potentially get into a relationship with a dog, would that mean you can't be incel?

Stop

That is a false equivalent.

 

[Ryo_Hazuki]

Our main problem is female behaviour not "chads".

It depends on how you look at it. But the way I see it, when Chads and Chadlites date down, which they often do, it causes a ripple effect. The consequences thereof get exponentially stronger the more you move down the looks scale until you get to sub4 men who can't get anyone.

Ultimately it all just boils down to the fact that due to biological differences between men and women...men want women VASTLY more than women want men. It's not just in terms of sex (that much is obvious) but also romance and attachment. Men are the romantics. Men are the ones who are hardwired to protect women. Men are the ones who buy an expensive ring, get on one knee, and take massive financial risks for the potential of commitment (marriage). Men are the ones who are almost always the more attached ones in relationships. Women are the ones who "fall out of love" easily. Women are the ones who initiate most breakups and file for divorce the vast majority of the time.

 

[Letmego]

Long story short, if you cannot find a female version of yourself, only below, you are incel. .

If you apply that back towards the people who are on this site, that statement really doesnt make a whole lot of sense.


And as for the entire issue being female behavior, chad isnt going to settle for one cunt so we can all have our fair share.

 

[Rightful anger]

Stop

That is a false equivalent.

No, it isn't. The principle is the same- unable to get a female of your own kind.

 

[Letmego]

It depends on how you look at it. But the way I see it, when Chads and Chadlites date down, which they often do, it causes a ripple effect. The consequences thereof get exponentially stronger the more you move down the looks scale until you get to sub4 men who can't get anyone.

Ultimately it all just boils down to the fact that due to biological differences between men and women...men want women VASTLY more than women want men. It's not just in terms of sex (that much is obvious) but also romance and attachment. Men are the romantics. Men are the ones who are hardwired to protect women. Men are the ones who buy an expensive ring, get on one knee, and take massive financial risks for the potential of commitment (marriage). Men are the ones who are almost always the more attached ones in relationships. Women are the ones who "fall out of love" easily. Women are the ones who initiate most breakups and file for divorce the vast majority of the time.

Its the beautiful flaw in our design.

 

[Deleted member 2119]

No, it isn't. The principle is the same- unable to get a female of your own kind.

They are the same species and Chad will fuck her if he has a normal functioning sex drive.

It is merely a p h e n o t y p e and not a different species with a different DNA makeup

 

[Mainländer]

The estimate proportion of incels varies wildly depending on how strict you are with the definition. No sex for life despite no standards and relentless trying? Not fucking an attractive female every 6 months? It can go from 3% to 90%.

 

[Rightful anger]

It depends on how you look at it. But the way I see it, when Chads and Chadlites date down, which they often do, it causes a ripple effect.

If a male chad dates down it's usually because he is already the victim of said effect.

Ultimately it all just boils down to the fact that due to biological differences between men and women...men want women VASTLY more than women want men. It's not just in terms of sex (that much is obvious) but also romance and attachment. Men are the romantics. Men are the ones who are hardwired to protect women. Men are the ones who buy an expensive ring, get on one knee, and take massive financial risks for the potential of commitment (marriage). Men are the ones who are almost always the more attached ones in relationships.

But this is contraty to popular culture: "Men want only sex. Poor women read romance novels and want commitment." Not to say I disagree, but it is enough for a woman to want a relationship a little bit for it to happen.

Women are the ones who "fall out of love" easily. Women are the ones who initiate most breakups and file for divorce the vast majority of the time.

100% agree, and yet we have 100 Hollywood movies about women who are left by their husbands for a single one, if even, where the guy is dumped. We live in an insane misandrist culture that has the world upside down. The worst part is when normies try to justify "he was not man enough." And how the fuck is a woman supposed to be woman enough?

It could also be a matter of power- women have far more choice, so they are more willing to break up as they can easily get a new man.

 

[Rightful anger]

They are the same species and Chad will fuck her if he has a normal functioning sex drive.

Chad will not fuck her if he finds the thought disgusting. Plenty of men say no, my friend.

It is merely a p h e n o t y p e and not a different species with a different DNA makeup

It is differences in bodily morphology, which is part of the phenotype, which is based on real genetic differences. Just an extrapolation of the same phenomenon.

 

[Deleted member 2119]

Chad will not fuck her if he finds the thought disgusting. Plenty of men say no, my friend.



It is differences in bodily morphology, which is part of the phenotype, which is based on real genetic differences. Just an extrapolation of the same phenomenon.

"Chad will not fuck her if he finds the thought disgusting. Plenty of men say no, my friend."
Most men are thirsty by default and you are downplaying the attractiveness of a 5/10 female. He will fuck her if he has no other options left- The coolidge effect is real. Rejecting her makes him a volcel

"It is differences in bodily morphology, which is part of the phenotype, which is based on real genetic differences. Just an extrapolation of the same phenomenon"
You compared it to a dog which is ridiculous. The gap between a 9/10 male and a 5/10 female is not as high as the gap between two different species.

 

[Rightful anger]

"Chad will not fuck her if he finds the thought disgusting. Plenty of men say no, my friend."
Most men are thirsty by default and you are downplaying the attractiveness of a 5/10 female. He will fuck her if he has no other options left- The coolidge effect is real. Rejecting her makes him a volcel

Just being horny is not going to make all men throw their pride and dignity into the trash. Rejecting her means he has standards and should be seen as a hero not condemned. Women take a lot of time. Why should chad waste time on a 5/10 that will not make him happy when he can use the time to get a woman in his own league?

"It is differences in bodily morphology, which is part of the phenotype, which is based on real genetic differences. Just an extrapolation of the same phenomenon"
You compared it to a dog which is ridiculous. The gap between a 9/10 male and a 5/10 female is not as high as the gap between two different species.

Enough of a difference to make someone attractive or unattractive.

 

[Pasteleiro]

 

[Testiclechincel]

dafuq did i just read