Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Easternism ends inceldom and poverty

cathuluelitist

cathuluelitist

Thoughtform Philanderer
★★★★
Joined
Mar 9, 2026
Posts
2,859
Online time
4d 12h
China and the orient have the greatest sex model and before the one child policy, China was the most sexually effective civilization where it literally got to the point where they became a superpower and the most economically successful nation in the world. China doesn't have childcare centers. The only time China had daycares was at the height of the communist revolution, when they wanted to abolish the family unit. You'll see in China, children three years of age and older can attend kindergarten, while all smaller children are cared for at home. The grandparents take care of the children, cook, and clean the house while the parents go to work. When the parents return from work, they take up these responsibilities. I can't help but think that this was probably the case for the most of human history, with the children and elderly remaining in the home camp or house while the young, virile parents went out to hunt, farm, etc. It's very rare to see a family made up of just the parents and kids, the grandparents are still in their hometown, along with other siblings, so the family structure is anti-zoism just naturally.

Most, if not all, marriages are semi-arranged since most people will have their parents set up their marriage since it's pretty much a 100 percent reject rate if you ask a Chinese girl in the workforce or somthing since they're extremely pretentious and been given pretty much pure nobility from the yiyeqing or the 419 revolution. In order to find a suitable spouse, the parents look to their friends, relatives (including the relative's friends and coworkers), and extended network and use their social power to basically automatically find you a partner. All marriages are through the family one way or another, even if you meet the person on your own. Young people there will never put romantic love detants over family since doing so will almost always leave them without assistance. You could argue and I technically agree that it's "unromantic" in the Western sense but this what would mean Western romantic love even exist which it doesn't. It's certainly not a "love at first sight, fall in love, throw away the world for you" sort of relationship paradigm which doesn't really even truly exist in the first place, contrary to sex traitors, William of Aquitaine and Leo Mcarthey propaganda you'll see in the West. It is completely impossible to have women or a person's wife at the center and above all other family members and considerations in the Eastern family structure. The family won't function if you do that. It will fall apart. Children are undoubtedly in the center while they are small. Grandparents are undoubtedly the center of attention when they are elderly and ill. Family takes care of its members most basic needs, thus everything will be structured around them and sacrifices will be made for them. Nobody is even aware of the couple at hand :feelskek: (You'll see the Teutonic Christians in the West put women in this position in a hope to relieve their infantilization which isn't actually possible since a lot of it is self-induced or just innate and natural (https://incels.is/threads/gynocracy-is-simultaneously-a-paedocracy.866352/) - I made a thread on it.

The couple doesn't even actually exist in the Eastern model since there's no actual distinction besides the fact that you have sex with them. The Eastern model has infinite benefits some which are the following... you'll never have to seek a job since your kin will provide you with one.... when you're sick, chances are your kins are or know of a doctor who does free bonos, and you can start up businesss with high capital and kin support, this is amazing since you'll be able to wealthmax for sex. Though in spite of this, like all good and bad, the West inseeminates and practically rapes civilizations with a variety of different seeds, good or bad. Cucks (a growing majority in China and the East) think that Asian traditional families are too efficient for them and they want the high tense hell that is chivalric foid worship. There are growing Asian sects (clearly CIA manufactured ones) that are pushing for smaller nuclear families and living apart from parents in China and China will fall to this but instead of wasting resources in China doing what the CCP is already pretty much doing but worse, the CIA should do social engineering campaigns for the US and get the rest of the West to follow the Eastern sex model. If feminist were smarter they'd also be pushing the Eastern model but they simply just aren't smart enough to recognize the incoming contra sex revolution.

Anyway, this post can pretty much be summarized by this one image:

1778112833940


(Eradicate san-ba)
 
The Eastern model has infinite benefits
You'll find even more spiritual benefits. I skimmed through some of Tertium Organum and you can reach entirely different levels of consciousness through positivistic Easternism and its connections.
 
Juche will solve everything
 
China and the orient have the greatest sex model and before the one child policy, China was the most sexually effective civilization where it literally got to the point where they became a superpower and the most economically successful nation in the world. China doesn't have childcare centers. The only time China had daycares was at the height of the communist revolution, when they wanted to abolish the family unit. You'll see in China, children three years of age and older can attend kindergarten, while all smaller children are cared for at home. The grandparents take care of the children, cook, and clean the house while the parents go to work. When the parents return from work, they take up these responsibilities. I can't help but think that this was probably the case for the most of human history, with the children and elderly remaining in the home camp or house while the young, virile parents went out to hunt, farm, etc. It's very rare to see a family made up of just the parents and kids, the grandparents are still in their hometown, along with other siblings, so the family structure is anti-zoism just naturally.

Most, if not all, marriages are semi-arranged since most people will have their parents set up their marriage since it's pretty much a 100 percent reject rate if you ask a Chinese girl in the workforce or somthing since they're extremely pretentious and been given pretty much pure nobility from the yiyeqing or the 419 revolution. In order to find a suitable spouse, the parents look to their friends, relatives (including the relative's friends and coworkers), and extended network and use their social power to basically automatically find you a partner. All marriages are through the family one way or another, even if you meet the person on your own. Young people there will never put romantic love detants over family since doing so will almost always leave them without assistance. You could argue and I technically agree that it's "unromantic" in the Western sense but this what would mean Western romantic love even exist which it doesn't. It's certainly not a "love at first sight, fall in love, throw away the world for you" sort of relationship paradigm which doesn't really even truly exist in the first place, contrary to sex traitors, William of Aquitaine and Leo Mcarthey propaganda you'll see in the West. It is completely impossible to have women or a person's wife at the center and above all other family members and considerations in the Eastern family structure. The family won't function if you do that. It will fall apart. Children are undoubtedly in the center while they are small. Grandparents are undoubtedly the center of attention when they are elderly and ill. Family takes care of its members most basic needs, thus everything will be structured around them and sacrifices will be made for them. Nobody is even aware of the couple at hand :feelskek: (You'll see the Teutonic Christians in the West put women in this position in a hope to relieve their infantilization which isn't actually possible since a lot of it is self-induced or just innate and natural (https://incels.is/threads/gynocracy-is-simultaneously-a-paedocracy.866352/) - I made a thread on it.

The couple doesn't even actually exist in the Eastern model since there's no actual distinction besides the fact that you have sex with them. The Eastern model has infinite benefits some which are the following... you'll never have to seek a job since your kin will provide you with one.... when you're sick, chances are your kins are or know of a doctor who does free bonos, and you can start up businesss with high capital and kin support, this is amazing since you'll be able to wealthmax for sex. Though in spite of this, like all good and bad, the West inseeminates and practically rapes civilizations with a variety of different seeds, good or bad. Cucks (a growing majority in China and the East) think that Asian traditional families are too efficient for them and they want the high tense hell that is chivalric foid worship. There are growing Asian sects (clearly CIA manufactured ones) that are pushing for smaller nuclear families and living apart from parents in China and China will fall to this but instead of wasting resources in China doing what the CCP is already pretty much doing but worse, the CIA should do social engineering campaigns for the US and get the rest of the West to follow the Eastern sex model. If feminist were smarter they'd also be pushing the Eastern model but they simply just aren't smart enough to recognize the incoming contra sex revolution.

Anyway, this post can pretty much be summarized by this one image:

View attachment 1723936

(Eradicate san-ba)
I’ve always maintained good relations with the orientals, what a respectable culture.
 
anti-feminism can end inceldom.
 
 
You'll find even more spiritual benefits. I skimmed through some of Tertium Organum and you can reach entirely different levels of consciousness through positivistic Easternism and its connections.
So you admit that the caveman-like abrahamic systems are faulty and that systems closer to atheism, dharma, or paganism ARE better?
 
So you admit that the caveman-like abrahamic systems are faulty and that systems closer to atheism, dharma, or paganism ARE better?
I can't take paganism seriously until there's one where they have a prophet who can make a coherent moral philosophy. That’s the threshold at which you’ve actually “presented a case” to compete. Taoism is the rare outlier of antilogo religions where there's folk ways brought together by Lao Tzu while maintaining the structure. Otherwise you’re offering an option that doesn’t exist which is unfair since you have to actually stand for something to criticize something fairly. I also am not against plurality, you can get a lot from various cultures, the rare exception to this is Moslem cultures but even then there's some merit, that's if you consider Persian Abyssaid to be Moslem culture.
 
Last edited:
I can't take paganism seriously until there's one where they have a prophet who can make a coherent moral philosophy. That’s the threshold at which you’ve actually “presented a case” to compete. Taoism is the rare outlier of antilogo religions where there's folk ways brought together by Lao Tzu while maintaining the structure. Otherwise you’re offering an option that doesn’t exist which is unfair since you have to actually stand for something to criticize something fairly. I also am not against plurality, you can get a lot from various cultures, the rare exception to this is Moslem cultures but even them there's some merit, that's if you consider Persian Abyssaid to be Moslem.
A lot of this thread comes from Arthur Wolf's essays and Ancestor’s Grudge by vohan. I've been reading a lot about China. China will definitely control all world power with various Taoist spheres of influence in the West so it's important we read up on their culture when this inevitably happens. Also, I'm a guy who has predicted the Nigeria question, the African strife, Ukraine, Iran and Charlie Kirk, along with various other things like China turning maoist.
 
Last edited:
I can't take paganism seriously until there's one where they have a prophet who can make a coherent moral philosophy. That’s the threshold at which you’ve actually “presented a case” to compete. Taoism is the rare outlier of antilogo religions where there's folk ways brought together by Lao Tzu while maintaining the structure. Otherwise you’re offering an option that doesn’t exist which is unfair since you have to actually stand for something to criticize something fairly. I also am not against plurality, you can get a lot from various cultures, the rare exception to this is Moslem cultures but even then there's some merit, that's if you consider Persian Abyssaid to be Moslem culture.
Morality is subjective anyways, and even animals can organize without killing each other, it is not something the jews had given gentiles, it's the other way around if anything.
 
Morality is subjective anyways, and even animals can organize without killing each other, it is not something the jews had given gentiles, it's the other way around if anything.
Even on real practical basis the subjective effects the objective. Goodness is largely built off faith in itself. You could logic yourself to the point where Santa Claus and the Holocaust are equally moral but that wouldn’t change that one would bring far more joy than the other.
 
Even on real practical basis the subjective effects the objective. Goodness is largely built off faith in itself. You could logic yourself to the point where Santa Claus and the Holocaust are equally moral but that wouldn’t change that one would bring far more joy than the other.
Yeah, but the jewish god in the sky that you want to force us to worship isn't what determines that. "Logicking out morality" is the very process of sorting out the "Santa Clauses" from the "Holocausts" (hoax*)" of the world. People like you believe that if the jews and their god yahweh says you should mutilate your cock you should mutilate your cock, if that demiurge says you kill your son you have to kill your son, if it says you have to abstain from anything that naturally fulfills you then you have to torture yourself and just hope that you'll go to heaven for it. It's the spiritual equivalent of transgenderism or veganism, all in the name of serving a tribal god of a people that eat children.
 
Yeah, but the jewish god in the sky that you want to force us to worship isn't what determines that. "Logicking out morality" is the very process of sorting out the "Santa Clauses" from the "Holocausts" (hoax*)" of the world. People like you believe that if the jews and their god yahweh says you should mutilate your cock you should mutilate your cock, if that demiurge says you kill your son you have to kill your son, if it says you have to abstain from anything that naturally fulfills you then you have to torture yourself and just hope that you'll go to heaven for it. It's the spiritual equivalent of transgenderism or veganism, all in the name of serving a tribal god of a people that eat children.
He does because he's real. You can throw "Jew" all you want but that doesn't invalidate anything if He's real.
 
He does because he's real. You can throw "Jew" all you want but that doesn't invalidate anything if He's real.
Him being real would be objectively bad for the world, and it wouldn't justify anything, it would just mean that life is hopeless and meaningless, and that were all slaves.
 
He does because he's real. You can throw "Jew" all you want but that doesn't invalidate anything if He's real.
He's not real. You don't have to live like this. You have a right to your foreskin, to eat bacon, and to listen to music.
 
He does because he's real. You can throw "Jew" all you want but that doesn't invalidate anything if He's real.
It does: he would be an evil presence if he were real. He's an evil fiction character as he is. If he's the source of morality then morality cannot be objective as it relies solely on this being's whims. If this guy was real and he raped little boys in front of you, would you still defend this guy because he's muh god or something?
 
It does: he would be an evil presence if he were real. He's an evil fiction character as he is. If he's the source of morality then morality cannot be objective as it relies solely on this being's whims. If this guy was real and he raped little boys in front of you, would you still defend this guy because he's muh god or something?
As a God, you transcend all earthly things, you cannot being to even understand the actions of a God. Read Plantinga or literally anything, this is a basic concept.
He's not real. You don't have to live like this. You have a right to your foreskin, to eat bacon, and to listen to music.
In Judaism and Islam yeah
 
Last edited:
As a God, you transcend all earthly things, you cannot being to even understand the actions of a God. Read Plantinga or literally anything, this is a basic concept.

In Judaism and Islam yeah
So whatever it does is "justified" because some vague, distant "greater good" like a million years in the future? Say what you mean instead of being vague as you try to rationalize your beliefs.
 
As a God, you transcend all earthly things, you cannot being to even understand the actions of a God. Read Plantinga or literally anything, this is a basic concept.

In Judaism and Islam yeah
Maybe in Christianity, the others are just plain rubbish that will never accommodate for the needs of humanity.
 
Maybe in Christianity, the others are just plain rubbish that will never accommodate for the needs of humanity.
I mean, Moslems and Jews are apostates, as for their effectiveness, my point stands. Judaism is one of the greatest things we've ever seen. The Jews prosper wherever they go, they’ve brought our civilization its greatest advances, they’re generally happy to be left alone and they always stick to what they believe in. The Jews are obviously special, and Judaism definitely has some worth as for goes for my effectiveness claim.
 

Similar threads

Loliraider
Replies
21
Views
935
Loliraider
Loliraider
undertaker77
Replies
11
Views
498
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel
WastedPotential
Replies
13
Views
1K
AutismKing
AutismKing

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top