The State, Church, society, kin, and family must enforce some sort of relationship between men and women in order for women to be optimally utilized and prevent their slavery (Force doctrine) by trainraining the value that comes with status and social impetus through an interminable Eastern propaganda bandwagon. If we had a Eastern meritocratic feudal aristocracy (this is in no way a paradox if you actually take it by the substance) everyone could have near supernal status. If you're at "attractive guy" level of untouchable in society you basically get to worldbox and ROG the planet. If you're at that level, police and most forms of law enforcement are completely ineffective and do pretty much nothing. Most threats are only ever used against those who are terrified by the rejoinder even if whatever happened was a terrible social crime.
I know this because this exact scenario happened during the Jacquerie revolt and when the women were plowed, you never saw reports from the aqlions even though they knew the current government at the time wanted to prosecute the revolutionaries.
Just from that alone and other historical precedents, it's very easy to understand that women hardly, if ever, file accusations against real criminals, the majority of those convicted of a crime by women are innocent to the degree that they only violated a less serious social crime. For example, one in thirty, of all rape accusations are invariably baseless. So in the context of women, failing a "crime" just means you were corraled by madeup social popism and the latter day feminine consensus at the time. And, following a simple logical line, all men found guilty of wife beating charges are innocent since if they actually did beat their wives they wouldn't have gotten arrested. There's solid biblical justification for all this as well. Easternism is in the bible, even if it isn't directly said. It's outlined by the Tenth Commandments.
This all only works fairly under Easternism. This psychological complex in particular works for everyone besides incels (with its effectiveness varying on how much more attractive and valuable they are relative to the average person)
(https://incels.is/threads/christianity-and-sex.858878/)
I know this because this exact scenario happened during the Jacquerie revolt and when the women were plowed, you never saw reports from the aqlions even though they knew the current government at the time wanted to prosecute the revolutionaries.
Just from that alone and other historical precedents, it's very easy to understand that women hardly, if ever, file accusations against real criminals, the majority of those convicted of a crime by women are innocent to the degree that they only violated a less serious social crime. For example, one in thirty, of all rape accusations are invariably baseless. So in the context of women, failing a "crime" just means you were corraled by madeup social popism and the latter day feminine consensus at the time. And, following a simple logical line, all men found guilty of wife beating charges are innocent since if they actually did beat their wives they wouldn't have gotten arrested. There's solid biblical justification for all this as well. Easternism is in the bible, even if it isn't directly said. It's outlined by the Tenth Commandments.
This all only works fairly under Easternism. This psychological complex in particular works for everyone besides incels (with its effectiveness varying on how much more attractive and valuable they are relative to the average person)
(https://incels.is/threads/christianity-and-sex.858878/)
