I don't give a fuck about Donald Trump. I never vote. I don't care whether or not he ever sexually assaulted any women. Maybe he did it to some of his accusers, maybe not.
But the disgusting piece of shit who somehow just won $5 million in a lawsuit against Trump is the most blatant liar in the history of rape accusers. Nobody who uses even a modicum of common sense would ever believe this insanity. She makes the Duke lacrosse accuser seem credible by comparison. Or Jussie Smollett.
Apparently nobody has read her (atrociously written) piece, "Hideous Men." Here it is, for those who haven't read it:
www.thecut.com
Here, she chooses some examples from her book of around 25 different men she claims sexually assaulted her.
Yeah. That's right. She claims 25 different men sexually assaulted her. For anyone who isn't a complete moron, nothing else needs to be said. She's a liar.
She claims a male friend of hers used to shove objects in her vagina when she was a kid. She claims a guy tried to rape her at knifepoint in the woods, but she somehow escaped while he was on top of her and opening his knife, because she's such an athletic former cheerleader. She claims a boss of hers chased after her in a car, and followed her to her hotel room to try to rape her, and she had to force the door closed on him. She claims Les Moonves, former CBS CEO, tried to rape her in an elevator. This was written after all of the accusations had been made by other women against Moonves, of course. Just like she only accused Trump after the accusations following his "grab 'em by the pussy" recording. She claims Hunter S. Thompson told her, "off with your pants," and sliced off her pants with a knife.
Among other men she accused in her book (the full version of her shit), she claimed her dentist sexually assaulted her, and she was molested by a camp counselor.
Basically, if you're a man, you have sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll.
Her book includes numerous quotes of conversations she pretends she had 25, 40, 50, 65 years ago. She puts them in actual quotation marks, and tells the stories as if she's writing a purple prose novel. And at other times, she indicates uncertainty over what Trump said, implying that when she put these extensive conversations in actual quotation marks, she was certain that those were the exact words used.
She also over-explains all of the holes in her story, which is a telltale sign of lying.
She indicates she's unsure whether or not he said "lingerie" or "underwear," but never indicates uncertainty over much of the rest of the long, extended dialogue she wrote.
"which indicates how very few people are in the store at the time."
In the middle of describing the fictional action, she realizes that people are going to wonder why celebrity Trump isn't getting mobbed, or why nobody would hear her scream (which she never says she did...nor does she ever say she used words to indicate she wanted him to stop...even in her own story, it's not clear from her descriptions of her actions that she didn't want it). But look at how it's phrased. "Which indicates"...like she's looking at her story from the outside and writing a literary analysis on what happened.
It almost seems like a troll. It's almost like she's trying to tell such a ridiculous, clearly false story, and show that no matter how absurd a woman's story is, she will be believed, because Believe All Women, Yo.
This is more ridiculous than Tom Robinson's conviction in To Kill a Mockingbird.
Oh, and if that weren't enough, in 2012, she wrote on Facebook that she is a "massive fan" of The Apprentice, which is hosted by a man she claims raped her. This was brought up in court, and she admitted to it, saying that she just loved the witty banter on the show. She also asked her Facebook friends if they would sleep with Trump for $17,000 if they could close their eyes and he weren't allowed to talk.
She also accused her ex-husband, John Johnson, of strangling her multiple times. I can actually believe that claim, because who wouldn't strangle her?
If anyone deserves to be strangled, it's E. Jean Carroll. If anyone deserves to be raped, it's E. Jean Carroll. Of course, doing the latter would be quite difficult, because she is the very definition of, "hideous." I couldn't get it up for her. She is disgusting in every single way. Her writing is disgusting. It's full of absolutely gross similes and metaphors (she loves comparing men to various types of animals). She is hideous to look at. She has the worst personality in history. Not only is she a lunatic, but she's a malicious lunatic. She's a complete psychopath.
Of course, she won't see a dime of Trump's money, because he has the resources to drag it out in court for the rest of her life, but what this case shows us is that the absurdity of soyfag ideology has carried over into the court system. The West is circling the drain.
But the disgusting piece of shit who somehow just won $5 million in a lawsuit against Trump is the most blatant liar in the history of rape accusers. Nobody who uses even a modicum of common sense would ever believe this insanity. She makes the Duke lacrosse accuser seem credible by comparison. Or Jussie Smollett.
Apparently nobody has read her (atrociously written) piece, "Hideous Men." Here it is, for those who haven't read it:
Donald Trump Assaulted Me, But He’s Not Alone on My List of Hideous Men
“I made a list of hideous men in my life. It includes the president — who assaulted me in the dressing room of Bergdorf Goodman 23 years ago.”
www.thecut.com
Here, she chooses some examples from her book of around 25 different men she claims sexually assaulted her.
Yeah. That's right. She claims 25 different men sexually assaulted her. For anyone who isn't a complete moron, nothing else needs to be said. She's a liar.
She claims a male friend of hers used to shove objects in her vagina when she was a kid. She claims a guy tried to rape her at knifepoint in the woods, but she somehow escaped while he was on top of her and opening his knife, because she's such an athletic former cheerleader. She claims a boss of hers chased after her in a car, and followed her to her hotel room to try to rape her, and she had to force the door closed on him. She claims Les Moonves, former CBS CEO, tried to rape her in an elevator. This was written after all of the accusations had been made by other women against Moonves, of course. Just like she only accused Trump after the accusations following his "grab 'em by the pussy" recording. She claims Hunter S. Thompson told her, "off with your pants," and sliced off her pants with a knife.
Among other men she accused in her book (the full version of her shit), she claimed her dentist sexually assaulted her, and she was molested by a camp counselor.
Basically, if you're a man, you have sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll.
Her book includes numerous quotes of conversations she pretends she had 25, 40, 50, 65 years ago. She puts them in actual quotation marks, and tells the stories as if she's writing a purple prose novel. And at other times, she indicates uncertainty over what Trump said, implying that when she put these extensive conversations in actual quotation marks, she was certain that those were the exact words used.
She also over-explains all of the holes in her story, which is a telltale sign of lying.
She indicates she's unsure whether or not he said "lingerie" or "underwear," but never indicates uncertainty over much of the rest of the long, extended dialogue she wrote.
"which indicates how very few people are in the store at the time."
In the middle of describing the fictional action, she realizes that people are going to wonder why celebrity Trump isn't getting mobbed, or why nobody would hear her scream (which she never says she did...nor does she ever say she used words to indicate she wanted him to stop...even in her own story, it's not clear from her descriptions of her actions that she didn't want it). But look at how it's phrased. "Which indicates"...like she's looking at her story from the outside and writing a literary analysis on what happened.
It almost seems like a troll. It's almost like she's trying to tell such a ridiculous, clearly false story, and show that no matter how absurd a woman's story is, she will be believed, because Believe All Women, Yo.
This is more ridiculous than Tom Robinson's conviction in To Kill a Mockingbird.
Oh, and if that weren't enough, in 2012, she wrote on Facebook that she is a "massive fan" of The Apprentice, which is hosted by a man she claims raped her. This was brought up in court, and she admitted to it, saying that she just loved the witty banter on the show. She also asked her Facebook friends if they would sleep with Trump for $17,000 if they could close their eyes and he weren't allowed to talk.
She also accused her ex-husband, John Johnson, of strangling her multiple times. I can actually believe that claim, because who wouldn't strangle her?
If anyone deserves to be strangled, it's E. Jean Carroll. If anyone deserves to be raped, it's E. Jean Carroll. Of course, doing the latter would be quite difficult, because she is the very definition of, "hideous." I couldn't get it up for her. She is disgusting in every single way. Her writing is disgusting. It's full of absolutely gross similes and metaphors (she loves comparing men to various types of animals). She is hideous to look at. She has the worst personality in history. Not only is she a lunatic, but she's a malicious lunatic. She's a complete psychopath.
Of course, she won't see a dime of Trump's money, because he has the resources to drag it out in court for the rest of her life, but what this case shows us is that the absurdity of soyfag ideology has carried over into the court system. The West is circling the drain.
Last edited:
