Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel "Don't touch people without consent" Says ITer who supports the ruining of an autistic guy's life for trying to befriend a girl

fuck_ITcucks

fuck_ITcucks

The only thing I could do was even the score
-
Joined
Jul 4, 2020
Posts
285
An autist who had no idea what he was doing touched a girl's arm while awkwardly trying to befriend her. For this, he has been charged with sexual abuse because he's not a chad.

I made a post talking about how this basically destroys the old ITer argument that "Elliot Rodger killed innocent people" because society arbitrarily destroys innocent people's lives too.

Well, now, they reposted this, and one of them said "just don't touch people without consent". This is an example of how the idea of "consent" is absurd and just an excuse to rationalize shaming and ostracizing non-chads. Requesting that you ask for consent before ever touching anyone is not only dystopic, it's also absurd. Do you ask for consent when you pass through a crowd and accidentally touch people? Do you ask for consent if a coworker is using headphones and you touch their arm bc he or she can't hear you? The idea is just stupid if you think about it seriously. But that's just every day's society's mental gymnastics to justify abusing incels and sub8 men.

Society does not act rationally, they act based on hate and cruelty and then come up with barely logical justifications.

Hear me out ITers: You do NOT get to claim to have the moral high ground over Elliot Rodger, a man who only wanted to be loved and explicitly said he'd forgive everyone who had wronged him if he could get a caring girlfriend, and tried to avoid exacting retribution, as a last resort, until the end, while you support arbitrarily ruining incel's lives.
 
Last edited:
dont bully incels without consent
 
Cucks ruined the world.
 
IT makes no sense... I bet they mock others in real life too
 
"Don't touch people without their consent" says the ITcel who touches kids
 
An autist who had no idea what he was doing touched a girl's arm while awkwardly trying to befriend her. For this, he has been charged with sexual abuse because he's not a chad.

I made a post talking about how this basically destroys the old ITer argument that "Elliot Rodger killed innocent people" because society arbitrarily destroys innocent people's lives too.

Well, now, they reposted this, and one of them said "just don't touch people without consent". This is an example of how the idea of "consent" is absurd and just an excuse to rationalize shaming and ostracizing non-chads. Requesting that you ask for consent before ever touching anyone is not only dystopic, it's also absurd. Do you ask for consent when you pass through a crowd and accidentally touch people? Do you ask for consent if a coworker is using headphones and you touch their arm bc he or she can't hear you? The idea is just stupid if you think about it seriously. But that's just every day's society's mental gymnastics to justify abusing incels and sub8 men.

Society does not act rationally, they act based on hate and cruelty and then come up with barely logical justifications.

Hear me out ITers: You do NOT get to claim to have the moral high ground over Elliot Rodger, a man who only wanted to be loved and explicitly said he'd forgive everyone who had wronged him if he could get a caring girlfriend, and tried to avoid exacting retribution, as a last resort, until the end, while you support arbitrarily ruining incel's lives.
All true.

But I think I know what happened here.

When they say don't touch without consent, they mean sexual parts of the body. Ass, boobs, thighs.etc

From what I understand, this was just some autist who looked up helped on youtube and read that touching people in a conversation is a good way to befriend them. Which is sorta true. But it depends on the kinda relationship you have with that person. And the way you touch. If a normie does it, it comesoff as creepy and sexual. Instead of platonic. I don't think even chad can do it without it being molesty... ofc it's not molesting when chad does it, but that's beside the point.

Whenever we communicate, a lot of things are not stated, and simply implied.
 
The thing is that they judge everyone that are not like them thinking they are right but when people talks about their gynocentric totem it's evil
 
Even if we assume their idea of consent is right, it still would be hypocritical because if a NT chad walked up to that lady and touched her without consent she would have been happy to talk with him. Its not about consent in the situation its about how the man looks.

And on top of that this whole idea of getting “consent” before touching someones arm is the most ridiculous garbage. How the hell are you supposed to live anywhere in the world if you are calling the police because youre scared when people touch you on the arm. You would be afraid to even step outside. But of course she isnt scared when people touch her she is only disgusted when sub 8 males touch her and she uses them like a tool in a toolbox for her own personal gain.

If i said some female should be sent to prison for brushing against someones arm without consent they would say I was crazy, jfl. Bunch of dumbass hypocrites who are smiling as they watch the west tear itself apart, as they post on reddit to make themselves feel like heroes
 
dont bully incels without consent
based
Even if we assume their idea of consent is right, it still would be hypocritical because if a NT chad walked up to that lady and touched her without consent she would have been happy to talk with him. Its not about consent in the situation its about how the man looks.

And on top of that this whole idea of getting “consent” before touching someones arm is the most ridiculous garbage. How the hell are you supposed to live anywhere in the world if you are calling the police because youre scared when people touch you on the arm. You would be afraid to even step outside. But of course she isnt scared when people touch her she is only disgusted when sub 8 males touch her and she uses them like a tool in a toolbox for her own personal gain.

If i said some female should be sent to prison for brushing against someones arm without consent they would say I was crazy, jfl. Bunch of dumbass hypocrites who are smiling as they watch the west tear itself apart, as they post on reddit to make themselves feel like heroes
based
 
The thing is it would be very unusual, almost unheard of, for people to ask to simply touch someone in a non-sexual way in most encounters.

It is part of flirting and escalating or even friendliness, but now it is only acceptable when Chad does it.

So you would have to know about the blackpill and that you are sub-8 to actually think to ask someone if it is ok to make non-sexual contact with them because if you didn't you would face jail.
 
I have autism and socialising is extremely difficult. I can’t figure out social cues when engaged in conversation.
 
The thing is it would be very unusual, almost unheard of, for people to ask to simply touch someone in a non-sexual way in most encounters.

It is part of flirting and escalating or even friendliness, but now it is only acceptable when Chad does it.

So you would have to know about the blackpill and that you are sub-8 to actually think to ask someone if it is ok to make non-sexual contact with them because if you didn't you would face jail.
There are some beta males out there who legit buy this "consent" crap and think women won't hate them if they play along. Jokes on them because there's no winning if you're ugly.

Women want non-chads to just GTFO, except to pay for their onlyfans and betabux. Every time we're somehow present in their lives, even if we just say "hi", they'll rage inside and wish we were dead, and try to think of some justification to gaslight us into thinking it's our fault that they hate us. The whole idea of consent is basically that.
I have autism and socialising is extremely difficult. I can’t figure out social cues when engaged in conversation.
suifuel, I used to be that way so i feel you. I'm not properly autistic since I wouldn't have been able to "grow out of it" if I was, since its a permanent condition, but growing up I was socially isolated and struggled with social cues too
 
Foids: omg he touched her arm sexual abuse!!!

Also foids: omg this dress code is so stupid, men need to stop sexualizing our body parts!!! I cant wear a tank top!!!
 
Foids: omg he touched her arm sexual abuse!!!

Also foids: omg this dress code is so stupid, men need to stop sexualizing our body parts!!! I cant wear a tank top!!!
based
 
Just don't touch people without their consent!

*guy kisses girl out of nowhere on that twitter video like happens at parties all the time*

He read the room, silly inkwells! Nothing wrong happened here just learn to read social cues
"just read the room theory" lmaooo good one, I forgot about that one

its hilarious how reddit calls being attractive "reading the room"
 
All true.

But I think I know what happened here.

When they say don't touch without consent, they mean sexual parts of the body. Ass, boobs, thighs.etc

From what I understand, this was just some autist who looked up helped on youtube and read that touching people in a conversation is a good way to befriend them. Which is sorta true. But it depends on the kinda relationship you have with that person. And the way you touch. If a normie does it, it comesoff as creepy and sexual. Instead of platonic. I don't think even chad can do it without it being molesty... ofc it's not molesting when chad does it, but that's beside the point.

Whenever we communicate, a lot of things are not stated, and simply implied.
I wouldn't say the waist is necessarily sexual touching. I would have to see where exactly he touched her.

People even touch the small of people's backs in completely non-sexual ways.

Anyways show them the video of that Chad forcibly kissing a girl and her saying afterwards "I'm okay with it he's hot" to show hypocritical, evil, and psychopathic these bluepillers are.

Also consent in a nutshell.
 
This is why they need to establish anglostan and have a middle eastern style culture with arranged marriages and assassination-by-family penalty for touching a foid.
 
I wouldn't say the waist is necessarily sexual touching. I would have to see where exactly he touched her.

People even touch the small of people's backs in completely non-sexual ways.

Anyways show them the video of that Chad forcibly kissing a girl and her saying afterwards "I'm okay with it he's hot" to show hypocritical, evil, and psychopathic these bluepillers are.

Also consent in a nutshell.
based
 
Tell that to the Chad that kissed the reporter out of the blue that was perceived as "wholesome".
An autist who had no idea what he was doing touched a girl's arm while awkwardly trying to befriend her. For this, he has been charged with sexual abuse because he's not a chad.

I made a post talking about how this basically destroys the old ITer argument that "Elliot Rodger killed innocent people" because society arbitrarily destroys innocent people's lives too.

Well, now, they reposted this, and one of them said "just don't touch people without consent". This is an example of how the idea of "consent" is absurd and just an excuse to rationalize shaming and ostracizing non-chads. Requesting that you ask for consent before ever touching anyone is not only dystopic, it's also absurd. Do you ask for consent when you pass through a crowd and accidentally touch people? Do you ask for consent if a coworker is using headphones and you touch their arm bc he or she can't hear you? The idea is just stupid if you think about it seriously. But that's just every day's society's mental gymnastics to justify abusing incels and sub8 men.

Society does not act rationally, they act based on hate and cruelty and then come up with barely logical justifications.

Hear me out ITers: You do NOT get to claim to have the moral high ground over Elliot Rodger, a man who only wanted to be loved and explicitly said he'd forgive everyone who had wronged him if he could get a caring girlfriend, and tried to avoid exacting retribution, as a last resort, until the end, while you support arbitrarily ruining incel's lives.

View: https://youtu.be/mEQheGSLYI8
 
Tell that to the Chad that kissed the reporter out of the blue that was perceived as "wholesome".


View: https://youtu.be/mEQheGSLYI8

yeah consent only applies to sub8 males, they want us to basically just be paypigs and bother women as little as possible. women want real life to be just like tinder, aka to have full control, and only interact with chads
 
Damned if you do damned if you don't. It's not about what you do it's about what you are.
Did you losers even approach women, ask them out, treat them like humans, tinder isn't real life. Also;

Ewwww nasty day gaming first person approacher is such a creep, who does that.
 
The dude who quote on quote "sexually harassed" that girl seems like he could be an autist too. I read that he looked some shit up on how to make friends. These people are disgusting.
 
Don't touch her of what? She'll get me IN JAIL? FUCK YOU STUPID CUCKS YOU HOW CAN YOU CONDONE THIS BULLSHIT
 
The dude who quote on quote "sexually harassed" that girl seems like he could be an autist too. I read that he looked some shit up on how to make friends. These people are disgusting.
tbh
 
I dont say it often but thats a high iq thread/post
 
This is about Jamie something, the UKcel who goes to Durham?
 
Very important post. You're a high value Greycel.
 
one of them said "just don't touch people without consent"
Imagine what kind of sheltered life this snowflake is living.

If I had to react everytime someone touches me without my consent, I'd be bashing skulls left and right in public transport and in most public spaces too
 
I think we need to take consent to the EXTREME. We need a blockchain of consent that record keeps consent in perpetuity for EVERYTHING no matter how trivial. If you might be in the periphery of another human female, you need consent for every action so that they will not be offended. This will be lifefuel for autists, that way everything will be closer to a "yes" or "no" binary, and life will be logical.
 
Last edited:
I think we need to take consent to the EXTREME. We need a blockchain of consent that record keeps consent in perpetuity for EVERYTHING no matter how trivial. This will be lifefuel for autists, that way everything will be closer to a "yes" or "no" binary, and life will be logical.
This would help with rape accusations, hiring practices, and marriage decisions (to make sure you aren't marrying a whore). Good idea.
 
I think we need to take consent to the EXTREME. We need a blockchain of consent that record keeps consent in perpetuity for EVERYTHING no matter how trivial. This will be lifefuel for autists, that way everything will be closer to a "yes" or "no" binary, and life will be logical.

That's where things would be moving quicker for non-chads if tradcucks and contrarian rightwingers weren't spewing mixed messages about how you need man up and have the balls to approach women and not wait for her approval to escalate like a pussy.
 
That's where things would be moving quicker for non-chads if tradcucks and contrarian rightwingers weren't spewing mixed messages about how you need man up and have the balls to approach women and not wait for her approval to escalate like a pussy.
I think the only way to implement a blockchain of consent realistically, is either if everyone was microchipped, or was forced to wear some kind of google glass that was constantly wired into a government cloud database, and you'd interface with other females that are about it come up in your periphery and then by culling their dataset of consent surveys you'd explicitly know every "rule" that individual female has in order to not offend them.
 
I think the only way to implement a blockchain of consent realistically, is either if everyone was microchipped, or was forced to wear some kind of google glass that was constantly wired into a government cloud database, and you'd interface with other females that are about it come up in your periphery and then you'd explicitly know every "rule" that individual female has in order to not offend them.

Redditors would pretend to be against this but jump on board the second it becomes normalized just like with selfies and carrying around a phone everywhere.

Your idea seems like what people at Silicon Valley would come up with so it would be the most likely to be implemented in Silicon Valley and other neoliberal leftist tech hubs first.

Besides the markofthebeast fear of being microchipped, the debate around bodily sovereignty by right and leftwing libertarians, pushback from contrarian alt-right sympathetic neoluddites and new age spiritual conspiracy theorists,
there is the fact that too many guys still think that it is the over reliance on tech that makes them unattractive to women rather than their looks.

If gigachad is advertised as using this tech so many normies will jump right on it making the groups opposed to it look like butthurt betas.
 
I think the only way to implement a blockchain of consent realistically, is either if everyone was microchipped, or was forced to wear some kind of google glass that was constantly wired into a government cloud database, and you'd interface with other females that are about it come up in your periphery and then by culling their dataset of consent surveys you'd explicitly know every "rule" that individual female has in order to not offend them.
Sexual acts should be criminalized if they aren't recorded on a blockchain. There should be a consent app on smartphones that everyone is required to use, and every sex act should be displayed on a public website. To prevent abuse by foids who want to keep their body count down (by having illicit sex and not recording it), there should be a "bounty" for males who report their non-consensual sex acts to the government. This bounty should be slightly larger than the cost of an escort, to incentivize reporting. There will be full sexual disclosure, just like with financial disclosure to the IRS, and this information could be used for blackpilled studies, employment practices, and marriage screening. Because sex is a transaction, it should be treated like a financial transaction and recorded in a public database. I've actually thought about this idea before and concluded it would help society a lot.
 
Sexual acts should be criminalized if they aren't recorded on a blockchain. There should be a consent app on smartphones that everyone is required to use, and every sex act should be displayed on a public website. To prevent abuse by foids who want to keep their body count down (by having illicit sex and not recording it), there should be a "bounty" for males who report their non-consensual sex acts to the government. This bounty should be slightly larger than the cost of an escort, to incentivize reporting. There will be full sexual disclosure, just like with financial disclosure to the IRS, and this information could be used for blackpilled studies, employment practices, and marriage screening. Because sex is a transaction, it should be treated like a financial transaction and recorded in a public database. I've actually thought about this idea before and concluded it would help society a lot.
It's a good way to weed out the fakecels. We will probably die before the consent blockchain becomes reality. In a weird way dating apps are an unintentionally experimental prototype for a consent blockchain. I guess we must suffer for good things to happen.
 
Last edited:
It's a good way to weed out the fakecels. We will probably die before the consent blockchain becomes reality
Women wouldn't want this to happen because they will be revealed as whores. It would also prevent them from falsely accusing men of raping them. There would be strong opposition.
 
Women wouldn't want this to happen because they will be revealed as whores. It would also prevent them from falsely accusing men of raping them. There would be strong opposition.
Women are such fucking whores. Consent is sexy :soy:. Consent is feminist. Privacy is for perverts. Giving up all your consent data to big brother IS the most feminist thing you can do.
 
Last edited:
Women are such fucking whores. Consent is sexy :soy:. Consent is feminist. Privacy is for perverts. Giving up all your consent data to big brother IS the most feminist thing you can do.
If we follow their ideology to its logical conclusion, then they should support full sexual disclosure. If sex is nothing to be ashamed of, as they claim, then they shouldn't mind if their high body count is on display on a public blockchain for all to see. They could compete with each other to see who can be the biggest whore. It would be like a leaderboard for a video game.
 
If we follow their ideology to its logical conclusion, then they should support full sexual disclosure. If sex is nothing to be ashamed of, as they claim, then they shouldn't mind if their high body count is on display on a public blockchain for all to see. They could compete with each other to see who can be the biggest whore. It would be like a leaderboard for a video game.
Who is the Satoshi Nakamoto of whores????

:feelsgah: :feelsgah: :feelsgah: :feelskek:
 

Similar threads

A
Replies
15
Views
633
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
Mortis
Replies
17
Views
877
highiqpostmaxxer
highiqpostmaxxer
Diomedes_1112
Replies
61
Views
2K
NorthernWind
NorthernWind
Copexodius Maximus
Replies
50
Views
2K
jbb
J

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top