The Declaration of Independence says, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
On the forum, you hear talk about a right to love, but don't forget rights come from God. Without a society built on faith, it doesn't seem like our right will be secured. It seems like hypergamy's cause is secularism. That's why men within religious communities have a higher fertility rate than secular men - women who are subjected to faith are less likely to create dead bedrooms and less likely to value looks and money. The evidence of their tendency against preferring betabuxxers is that Haredi Jews are more likely to be on government assistance, yet their fertility rate is healthy. The proof of their tendency against denying men love is their high fertility rate. The concept that faith is the solution to discrimination against ugly people is backed up by the fact that "there was nothing in his appearance to make us desire" Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. Ironically, Jews are more likely to vote Democrat, yet many still believe the GOP is the solution, and it's not. Misogyny, which is bad, too seems absent within those who truly adhere to faith. I've reached the point where I think it's likely that only such groups - the Amish, the Haredi, and others who practice respect for children, will go to Heaven. Childlessness is a sin - even an unpardonable sin.
I know you might question this hypothesis, but I will hold my ground: if a community does not have an adequate rate of producing children, then it's not based in faith, even if they claim otherwise. Faith without works is dead. You might also say it's unfair childlessness is a sin because "it's not your fault." Well, aborted children can't enter the kingdom of Heaven because they never become producers of progeny either. Faith isn't fair, but there's a solution: repent. First convert this forum to the faith, and then we've completed the first step towards converting the world, after which each women will be guaranteed a husband and femceldom will be eradicated once and for all.
Part of the solution is recognizing the toxic masculinity of anti-natalism. Women create children and men can't. Therefore attitudes against natalism are not feminine nor feminist, which are two words which have the same root word and mean the same thing, but rather masculine - a toxic version of it. If you examine the secular and infertile movements, you will notice this. I could write a book on it, but I'll be succinct. One of the top peddlers against faith is Richard Dawkins is a man. He's also had only one child despite being a senior citizen. My point is that a lot of secularists are men who contained a toxic version of masculinity. Even Margaret Sanger I'd say was one of the most notable vicious misogynists in history, given her activism to secure women's right to choose contraception which is violence against women, but really she won't be going to Hell alone. Many people are childless too. She had three children, but that's obviously not enough to go to Heaven.
Personally, I'm a trans-exclusionary feminist(which is sort of a redundant term) and a natalist. I'm a feminist not despite my natalism, but rather, I'm a natalist because I'm a feminist.
On the forum, you hear talk about a right to love, but don't forget rights come from God. Without a society built on faith, it doesn't seem like our right will be secured. It seems like hypergamy's cause is secularism. That's why men within religious communities have a higher fertility rate than secular men - women who are subjected to faith are less likely to create dead bedrooms and less likely to value looks and money. The evidence of their tendency against preferring betabuxxers is that Haredi Jews are more likely to be on government assistance, yet their fertility rate is healthy. The proof of their tendency against denying men love is their high fertility rate. The concept that faith is the solution to discrimination against ugly people is backed up by the fact that "there was nothing in his appearance to make us desire" Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. Ironically, Jews are more likely to vote Democrat, yet many still believe the GOP is the solution, and it's not. Misogyny, which is bad, too seems absent within those who truly adhere to faith. I've reached the point where I think it's likely that only such groups - the Amish, the Haredi, and others who practice respect for children, will go to Heaven. Childlessness is a sin - even an unpardonable sin.
I know you might question this hypothesis, but I will hold my ground: if a community does not have an adequate rate of producing children, then it's not based in faith, even if they claim otherwise. Faith without works is dead. You might also say it's unfair childlessness is a sin because "it's not your fault." Well, aborted children can't enter the kingdom of Heaven because they never become producers of progeny either. Faith isn't fair, but there's a solution: repent. First convert this forum to the faith, and then we've completed the first step towards converting the world, after which each women will be guaranteed a husband and femceldom will be eradicated once and for all.
Part of the solution is recognizing the toxic masculinity of anti-natalism. Women create children and men can't. Therefore attitudes against natalism are not feminine nor feminist, which are two words which have the same root word and mean the same thing, but rather masculine - a toxic version of it. If you examine the secular and infertile movements, you will notice this. I could write a book on it, but I'll be succinct. One of the top peddlers against faith is Richard Dawkins is a man. He's also had only one child despite being a senior citizen. My point is that a lot of secularists are men who contained a toxic version of masculinity. Even Margaret Sanger I'd say was one of the most notable vicious misogynists in history, given her activism to secure women's right to choose contraception which is violence against women, but really she won't be going to Hell alone. Many people are childless too. She had three children, but that's obviously not enough to go to Heaven.
Personally, I'm a trans-exclusionary feminist(which is sort of a redundant term) and a natalist. I'm a feminist not despite my natalism, but rather, I'm a natalist because I'm a feminist.
